Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Dear Martin,

There's a big difference between passively misremembering the shade of a jacket and actively remembering the actions of a person who is not only in an unusual hurry but has just put on said jacket and is in the process of zipping it up as he rushes out the door.

-- Tom

Nice try, but no cigar. She said the jacket was dark from the beginning and her lack of powers of observation are clear when you read her affidavit in which she says that she couldn't describe the clothing Oswald was wearing when he entered the rooming house.

No, why in the world would she not be able to describe Oswald's clothing as he came in as well as when he left. She can't even describe the jacket, gets the color wrong and only makes a comment about him zipping up a jacket. Even worse, Roberts, by her own admission, wasn't paying much attention and the circumstances as she described justify the conclusion that she only saw Oswald for a few seconds as he opened the front door and walked out.

Besides, the grey jacket wasn't even in the rooming house on Friday morning, but in Irving instead.

It's amazing that anybody would blindly accept the statement about one particular item from a woman with bad vision, who wasn't paying attention, got everything else wrong and who her employer described as somebody who makes up stories.
52
And does BW Frazier agree NOW, in the year 2026, that the rifle was in the package he saw Oswald carry into the TSBD annexed warehouse bldg?

Or was Frazier still a very scared young man in 1964 who had just a year earlier been thru an interrogation with Fritz where  Frazier thought Fritz was about to strike him in the face.?


53
You say stupid things like this, exposing you unhealthy obsession with the KGB, and still expect people to consider you to be of sound mind. Hilarious!

Dear Martin,

What's ironic is that you, like me, are anti-Trump, but you don't realize that "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin installed him as our "president" on 20 January 2017 so that he could wittingly or unwittingly tear us apart, and did so as a final step of a process that began in 1959 when the Kremlin realized that the USSR and the Warsaw Pact couldn't defeat the U.S. and NATO militarily.

One step of said process was its publishing an anti-CIA / anti-Clay Shaw article in a Communist-owned Italian newspaper three days after overly ambitious, scandal-plagued, and revengeful Jim Garrison arrested Shaw on suspicion of organizing a homosexual "thrill-kill" assassination of JFK.

Which eventually led, of course, to Comrade Oliver Stone's 1991 self-described mythological ("to counter the myth of the Warren Report") film, "JFK."

How many times have you watched it, now?

Sad!

-- Tom

PS Anyone who is interested in learning more about the KGB's 1959 "Master Plan" can go to Substack (for free!) and read my 500-plus (free!) articles at my page, "How the KGB Zombified the CIA and the FBI."

At last count, about 1,500 people are "following" me there.
54
Says the fool who thinks the statements of a woman who admitted that she wasn't paying attention, had bad vision, and only could have seen Oswald for a few seconds as he opened the frontdoor and walked out should be written in stone.

Roberts said the jack was dark colored, which it wasn't, and she couldn't identify it during her testimony, so she didn't get a damned thing wrong which of course means for crazy Bill Brown that she must have been right about the zipping part. Go figure!

Btw, the grey jacket wasn't even in Oak Cliff on Friday morning. There is no way it could have been. We've discussed this in the past but you will never ever accept anything that you don't like, so I am not going to revisit that discussion.

Dear Martin,

There's a big difference between passively misremembering the shade of a jacket and actively remembering the actions of a person who is not only in an unusual hurry but has just put on said jacket and is in the process of zipping it up as he rushes out the door.

-- Tom
55
That "Pfff" proves what I've suspected for a long time: You're not only zombified by KGB disinformation regarding the JFKA, but beans as well.

You say stupid things like this, exposing you unhealthy obsession with the KGB, and still expect people to consider you to be of sound mind. Hilarious!
56
Point being, in October of '64, Buell Frazier acknowledged that the assassination weapon was in the package and his car transported the rifle to the Depository building.  He even says that Oswald finalized his plans to carry out the assassination in that car.

Like it or not, Frazier states, in the affidavit, that the rifle was in the bag and therefore by default he is telling you that the bag was large enough.

If he knew those things at the time, then Frazier, IMHO, was an accomplice.
57
What Weidmann is doing here is a perfect example of a conspiracy Kook being unable to explain why Oswald would ditch his jacket between the rooming house on Beckley and the shoe store on Jefferson.

Instead of dealing with the fact that Oswald threw down his jacket at some point, the Kooks try to argue that Oswald was zipping up his button up shirt.   :D

Mrs. ROBERTS: Yes; it was a zipper jacket. How come me to remember it, he was zipping it up as he went out the door.
Mr. BALL: He was zipping it up as he went out the door?
Mrs. ROBERTS: Yes.


Says the fool who thinks the statements of a woman who admitted that she wasn't paying attention, had bad vision, and only could have seen Oswald for a few seconds as he opened the frontdoor and walked out should be written in stone.

Roberts said the jack was dark colored, which it wasn't, and she couldn't identify it during her testimony, so she didn't get a damned thing right which of course means for crazy Bill Brown that she must have been right about the zipping part. Go figure!

Btw, the grey jacket wasn't even in Oak Cliff on Friday morning. There is no way it could have been. We've discussed this in the past but you will never ever accept anything that you don't like, so I am not going to revisit that discussion.
58
Surely you've heard Buell Frazier talk before, with that VERY strong accent.  The fact that the affidavit says "Erwin" instead of Irving should make it obvious to you that Frazier was talking as the transcriber was typing it out.  Use your common sense.

As for the pizza, my point was that we talked about the affidavit.  Out of respect for Dave Perry (Buell's friend and who set up the pizza night), I won't tell you what was said.  However, I had a video call with Perry last Monday and I'm trying to get Perry to agree to release the details of the conversation with Frazier.

This is what you'd call FREAL research, i.e. going straight to the horse's mouth (as opposed to doing what YOU do, which is simply call it fake and ignore it).

Hilarious,

This so-called affidavit lacks the normal form for these documents, doesn't identify the notary, and was allegedly drawn up in Dallas and you argue they wouldn't have know that Erwin was in fact Irving? And as far as common sense goes, there isn't a notary in the country that will blindly sign an affidavit without checking the content of the document.

As for the pizza, my point was that we talked about the affidavit.  Out of respect for Dave Perry (Buell's friend and who set up the pizza night), I won't tell you what was said.  However, I had a video call with Perry last Monday and I'm trying to get Perry to agree to release the details of the conversation with Frazier.

This is what you'd call FREAL research, i.e. going straight to the horse's mouth (as opposed to doing what YOU do, which is simply call it fake and ignore it).


Oh please, give it up already, you hypocrite. You won't tell us what was said, yet here you are posting those crappy documents and basically claiming that Frazier said they were authentic.

And talking about "real research", do you really think you are the only one who has ever spoken to Frazier? The difference between you and me is you make claims about it.

It's obvious that you clearly can not authenticate those papers. That's the only reason for this song and dance.

59
Let me guess, you are one of the few who do understand the Single Bullet Theory.... Pfff what a pathetic loser you truly are!

That "Pfff" proves what I've suspected for a long time: You're not only zombified by KGB disinformation regarding the JFKA, but beans as well.
60
What Weidmann is doing here is a perfect example of a conspiracy Kook being unable to explain why Oswald would ditch his jacket between the rooming house on Beckley and the shoe store on Jefferson.

Instead of dealing with the fact that Oswald threw down his jacket at some point, the Kooks try to argue that Oswald was zipping up his button up shirt.   :D

Mrs. ROBERTS: Yes; it was a zipper jacket. How come me to remember it, he was zipping it up as he went out the door.
Mr. BALL: He was zipping it up as he went out the door?
Mrs. ROBERTS: Yes.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10