Recent Posts
I will never understand why some people have a predisposition to blame the Jewish people for all the ills of the planet. It is every bit as vile as any other form of bigotry yet there are places where this attitude is actually tolerated and even condoned.
Nothing has changed. The mouth of the shell casing never remotely comes near striking the rear receiver bridge. Hitting a flat surface is not going to create a dent like what is on CE 543.
It is a physical impossibility for the shell to flip beyond a 180 degrees that would be needed to overcome the shell body and then strike anything on the receiver bridge that can put a dent in the mouth of the shell as described by the AI.
The HSCA test‑fired dent was “in at the top” and sloped downward — a downward‑angled inward crush — whereas CE 543’s dent is a compound deformation with an inward dimple and an outward flare.
What is it about this that makes you want to enter the Twilight Zone in an attempt to create a bizarre scenario? The HSCA did not duplicate the dent in the CE 543 shell casing. Nobody has. It has a dimple in the middle of it and the top lip is flared back.
Try loading an empty shell casing into the rifle. It does not go smoothly and the lip hangs up.
If he had his finger on the trigger before he was ready to shoot, he was violating one of the cardinal rules of gun handling. There is a reason for that rule and it is specifically intended to prevent an unintentional discharge. I believe he fully intended to hit JFK with that first shot and it was the extraordinary difficulty of that shot that caused him to miss that badly.
Take a look at this slow-motion video starting at ~7:20. The cartridge definitely hits the rear receiver bridge. And if there had been only a slight bit more rotation of the cartridge, the mouth of the cartridge would have hit it.
In what world does his handwritten two shot statement translate into an early missed shot
Your reading comprehension is exceptionally poor. Bennett clearly describes two separate events, the shot he heard and the one he saw strike JFK's back. He "looked at the boss's care" AFTER hearing the first shot.
--------------
Brehm 11/22 Dallas Herald
The witness Brehm was shaking uncontrollably as he further described the shooting. "The first shot must not have been too solid, because he just slumped. Then on the second shot he seemed to fall back." Brehm seemed to think the shots came from in front of or beside the President. He explained the President did not slump forward as if he would have after being shot from the rear. The book depository building stands in the rear of the President's location at the time of the shooting.
Another two shot witness. First shot and JFK slumped.
Brehm can be seen clapping after JFK had slumped over after the second shot struck him. He obviously had no clue as to what was going on. He didn't figure that out until he saw JFK's head explode.
Plenty of witnesses have been cited and you just lie about what they have to say. That tells us all we need to know about you.
"How can one expect a president to shed light on the assassination of another president when he is not even interested in investigating the assassination attempt on himself?"
Candace Owens says President Trump is covering up the truth about the Butler assassination attempt because it was either staged or intended as a warning shot to force him into compliance. Owens says Dan Bongino is in full panic mode as questions continue to grow around the case, calling him a "stone-cold liar."
---------------------
Judyth Baker on X yesterday, quote
Judyth Vary Baker
@Judyth
·
Jun 12
My attempts to testify to Luna about Lee Harvey Oswald has resulted in a humungous email effort to STOP me, using old arguments from 20 years ago based on altered emails and misquotes. Desperate to stop me, here's what they are ending to everyone they can think of:
"Judyth Vary Baker...fails on chronology (the Cancún anachronism, met with characteristic blame-shifting), on corroboration (Anna Lewis places her with Oswald while he was in Minsk), and on her sole documentary tether — a Reily Coffee W-2 whose authenticity is contested and which, in any event, suggests only co-employment; no contemporaneous Reily co-worker mentions her at all." GOT THAT? Now here are some facts to chew on:
THE CANCUN BRUHAHA
"Judyth Vary Baker ...fails on chronology (the Cancún anachronism, met with characteristic blame-shifting),..."
20 yrs ago, I had not yet located evidence about the real Cancun we planned to visit BEFORE perhaps going to Chichen-Itza. My agent, Peter Cox, thought a "fine hotel" Lee mentioned was on the then-deserted island of Cancun. We had planned to tay at a tiny village called Kankun, certainly no fine hotel.
For this and other gaffs, such as claiming I'd been sh^t at in Mexico, and had been hiding in Europe, I fired him. My insistence that we KNEW Cancun was called a lie. I insisted that an archeological dig was conducted there in July 1963, which Lee and I saw on exhibit in late August at Tulane' Latin American Library. Lee knew a CIA agent had rented a boat to go there - Dr. Wyllys Andrews -- who said the beach was suitable as an airstrip. I was finally able to prove the dig and exhibit occurred, and that I knew Cancun was a desert island back in 1963, in 2023 - multiple researchers went in person with me to Tulane' Latin American Library and found the evidence: the dig, the maps, the photos, just as I had described them. I had never even mentioned Cancun until my agent mentioned it, because of course, Lee was ordered back to Dallas and then was framed.
According to my enemies, I planned to meet Lee at a "fine hotel" at Cancun in 1963. They are shameless liars. The documents proving the dig, maps, etc, were photographed in a documentary June 5, 2026. And I have the name of those who witnessed finding the evidence.
"However, on corroboration (Anna Lewis places her with Oswald while he was in Minsk)..." 36 years later, Anna Lewis, who was filmed without any warning or preparation, remembered seeing Lee Oswald for the first time in 1962. She was off by a year. She spent over 35 minute describing everything else in detail, such as that Lee and I double-dated with her and her husband, David (who is in the JFK record). If anything, missing the date by one year how Anna Lewis wa not coached and had not prepared anything in advance.
THIS LAST ONE IGNORES NEW EVIDENCE:
"and on her sole documentary tether — a Reily Coffee W-2 whose authenticity is contested and which, in any event, suggests only co-employment..."
LOL! There are check stubs, bank statements, executive stationery, and now, Lee's time cards I had described which were finally released by the FBI some 12 years ago, which have my initial "J" on 6 of Lee's 11 time cards from Reily.
We were also registered at the A-1 Employment office (there were 6 active and 9 total employment office in New Orleans),
we were hired the same day to work at a tiny Reily sub-company (Standard) where our record were laundered, then transferred together a week later to Reily.
The day Lee was fired, an ad was ordered to replace me, as our job were together.
I was fired a week early on Aug 9 - the same day Lee was arrested - because I was seen with him.
They are griping that the W2 form I have was forged!
They wrote:
"...no contemporaneous Reily co-worker mentions her at all."
That is a lie. My witness is in my book, Lee Harvey Oswald and Me, along with her photo from 1963. Also, a private detective hired by a person still alive interviewed Reily workers who remembered me, but not Lee (he was a maintenance man, I was the Vice President'ss Finance and Security Secretary, quite visible.
Their 20-year-old accusations were never updated. Besides failing to update, NOT ONE OF MY ACCUSERS EVER CONTACTED ME for information all thee years. They relied on emails that in some cases can be easily seen to have been altered.
I am 83 years old. Most of my supporters who saw my original evidence are now gone. Some of my documents have been stolen. I have suffered injuries, threats and bankruptcy. I have never asked for money for any interview.
Two of my enemieshave recently been added to Rep. Luna' committee. They want to make sure my voice is never heard.
I'm also being muzzled here on X. My information on cancer a a bioweapon, in 1963, using the SV40 Monkey Virus, wasrevealed in 1999. Powerful Big Pharma source don't want me to peak, either.
I am writing this to set the record straight with the public. Lee Harvey Oswald was framed. He was silenced forever in front of 70+ Dallas Police.
THEY WANT ME TO BE SILENCED FOREVER, TOO.
PLEASE HELP PROTECT ME.
PLEAE REPOST THIS.
I THANK GOD I AM STILL ABLE TO SPEAK.
Thank you for your time.
God bless you all.
Close quote
The Making of a Conspiracist
This is a story I did not want to write. One of my friends and collaborator over the years has now turned into a full-fledged conspiracist -- he has
become a 9/11 truther, a believer that the Mossad killed Kennedy and that the Jews have contributed nothing to humanity. It's quite a sad
story -- to see this personally.
https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/the-making-of-a-conspiracist
My implication is exactly the opposite. I am saying that LHO was too good of a marksman to have missed by that much. Therefore I believe the missed first shot was not an intentional shot.
I said he could not speak Russian. I didn’t say he didn’t know some basic words and phrases. Oswald had a self-taught primitive understanding of Russian. Oswald had studied Russian phrasebooks and the Russian alphabet. He could order soup in Moscow and find places like the US embassy when he arrived. I use phrasebooks when I go to Italy so I can say “ Dove informazioni turistico?” and order “pizza con formaggio, per favore”. I don’t say I speak Italian.
-- Oswald spoke a fair amount of Russian before he went to Russia, and his Russian got even better after living there for over 2 years. The fact that you don't know this indicates your research has been inadequate.
- No, Oswald was not a nut. He was actually highly intelligent and a voracious reader. You assume he was a nut and then you accuse me of not thinking critically because I did not also assume this! I did not assume this because it is not true, because the evidence shows he was highly intelligent.I didn’t suggest otherwise. Do you think only unintelligent people can be mentally ill?
It is odd and rather comical that you would cite Oswald's defection as evidence of his supposed mental illness while ignoring the many aspects of his defection that indicate he was a false defector working for U.S. intelligence.Oh. I wasn’t aware there was evidence that he was a false defector working for the US. I am sure you will let us all know what that evidence is.
-- Yes, I would certainly expect Oswald to have admitted his guilt if he had killed JFK to make a name for himself in history.
Now that we've established that Oswald was not a nut, what is your theory about his motive?Oswald was impulsive. What was his motive for shooting at General Walker or shooting Officer Tippitt? Impulsive people are not always acting with rational motives. He may have had a motive that made sense to him at the time but there is not sufficient evidence to conclude anything.
You are right that I have not read all the pro-conspiracy books. But if they presented real evidence I am pretty sure would have heard about it. I don’t read books by Holocaust deniers either.
-- Your claim that pro-conspiracy JFKA books "present no evidence" proves that you've read few if any of them. A key component of critical thinking is to genuinely and thoroughly consider both sides of an argument before reaching a conclusion. You clearly have not done that.
One of your comments deserve special notice, because it reveals your bias and lack of research:So where is the evidence of the wire taps? Then where is the evidence to prove that the things said in them are actually true?
One, where do you get "60+ years"? Fonzi's book, for example, came out in 1993, 30 years after the assassination and was substantially based on information that he obtained during the 1970s. Many of the accounts of Mafia leaders being involved in the assassination surfaced in the 1970s and 1980s--and, again, some were based on informant reports and wiretaps.
