JFK Assassination Forum

He didn't steal anything. He made some copies for himself so he could study them.

And I can see you don't do reasonable inferences or logical conclusions either.

Can you really not see how desperate you look when you say things like this?:

"No it doesn't prove that Oswald ever had that bag in [his] possession. All it shows is that he touched it."

do you think it's possible to come up with a "reasonable and sensible" scenario that explains every piece of evidence in the JFK and Tippit cases WITHOUT having to resort to any of the things I mentioned in my last post?

Those things being: Fantasy, wild speculation, and tons of planted evidence and coerced witnesses.

Good luck in your efforts. For I don't think it's even remotely possible to accomplish that task.

Without speculating, prove to me that Oswald ever had the 6th floor bag in his possession. I bet you can't!

Oh btw, David, I don't do propaganda!

Gerry, this is an absolute falsehood. He stole evidence from the HSCA and printed fake autopsy photos in his books. There is nothing honest about him.

You're just being obstinate. You refuse to accept any evidence that Oswald was double murderer. You will find any excuse to dismiss any and all evidence of his guilt. Your statement that "None of this provides evidence of Oswald ever carrying that bag" might be the lamest excuse you have ever made, which is saying something. Oswald's palm print at the bottom of the bag is proof positive he carried that bag. That palm print is exactly where it should be if he carried the bag cupped in his right had as Frazier described. You excuses keep getting more and more pathetic.
Unbelievable!!!
A person interested in the truth would weight that likelihood against the likelihood that Oswald's rifle transmitted the fibers to the bag. But you have no interest in the truth. You want your silly beliefs to be true. It's not working.
The intelligent people who are aware of the evidence knows Oswald rifle was in that blanket and later transferred to Oswald's makeshift bag. I guess that leaves you out.
Irony alert!
Sherlock Holmes you ain't. Columbo you ain't. Your powers of reasoning are more like Inspector Clouseau's.
The ability to reason and draw logical inferences from the evidence is not speculation. I wouldn't expect someone like you to be able to understand that.
Not to you, Clouseau.
Your reply is disappointing, David

So is your inability to find the right answer for 2 + 2.