Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Oodles and gobs, or just a few?
« Last post by Bill Brown on Yesterday at 01:55:00 PM »
"We have positively identified eleven of the three assassins."
52
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Education Forum Returns to Sanity, and WN Is No Longer a Moderator
« Last post by Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 01:47:57 PM »
Quote from: Mark Ulrik on Yesterday at 11:10:05 AM
Would it make any difference if we begged you to stay?

It will be interesting to see how your Altgens bullet hole theory fares there. That one was a real doozy.

Not at all. If you think the Altgens bullet hole "theory," is a "real doozy," perhaps you will explain the evidence that Doug Weldon, Doug Horne, Roy Schaeffer, and Dr. David Mantik have presented on the subject.

You guys constantly dismiss solid, valid evidence with bombastic verbiage but rarely get around to dealing with evidence itself.

The hole is visible in certain frames of the MPI large-format version of the Zapruder film. I can see it with my own eyes. The only response you guys have offered is that the apparent hole is an optical illusion.

53
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: What If Grassy Knoll Sounds And Smoke Were "Only" A Diversion?--A Fun Update!
« Last post by Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 12:50:13 PM »
TG-

Maybe.
54
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: What If Grassy Knoll Sounds And Smoke Were "Only" A Diversion?--A Fun Update!
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 12:16:51 PM »
What if Lee Harvey Oswald really did smuggle his rifle into the TSBD and shoot JFK all by himself. What would the evidence look like? It would look exactly like the evidence we have available to us.
55
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Oodles and gobs, or just a few?
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 12:15:02 PM »
If they are able to answer the initial question, the follow up question becomes: How do you put together such a massive conspiracy without exposing the plot ahead of time. Think of all the law enforcement officers and government officials that would have to be approached and get on board. Are we supposed to believe all these people were made aware of this plot and every single one of them signed on? All it would take would be for one of these people to blow the whistle on the whole operation. Are we supposed to believe JFK was so universally despised that all these people conspired to kill him? Not one decent person spoke up to stop the assassination from being carried out. Even if one believes that is remotely possible, how would the plotters KNOW they would get 100% cooperation? If they approached even one person who refused to go all, it would have been game over.

The questions also apply if one theorizes all these people got on board the cover up AFTER the assassination. The plotters would have had to know IN ADBANCE that they were going to get 100% cooperation from the people they needed to engineer the cover up. Then they would have to get that 100% cooperation for the cover up to be successful. Not one whistle blower in the whole operation.

I can't decide which of these scenarios is the more ludicrous.
56
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Education Forum Returns to Sanity, and WN Is No Longer a Moderator
« Last post by Mark Ulrik on Yesterday at 11:10:05 AM »
Quote from: Michael T. Griffith on Yesterday at 12:22:28 AM
Great news: Yesterday I received an email from the new lead moderator of the Education Forum (JFK Assassination Debate) advising me that my ban has been lifted and inviting me to resume posting in the forum. And, William Niederhut is no longer a moderator.

If you see a decrease in the frequency of my posts and replies, it will be because I have resumed posting in the Ed Forum.

Would it make any difference if we begged you to stay?

It will be interesting to see how your Altgens bullet hole theory fares there. That one was a real doozy.
57
General Discussion And Debate (Any Topic) / Re: U.S. And International Politics
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 10:10:46 AM »
Quote from: Richard Smith on July 30, 2026, 08:26:46 PM
[Fauci's] "lifetime achievement" is to be complicit in the deaths of 15 million people. 

You're full of it.
58
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: What If Grassy Knoll Sounds And Smoke Were "Only" A Diversion?--A Fun Update!
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 05:08:55 AM »
Quote from: Benjamin Cole on Yesterday at 01:41:21 AM
If JFK was only struck from the rear, why the "back and to the left" motion of JFK's head?

Maybe due to the fact that he was sitting, wearing a tight corset/back brace, and the right side of his brain was destroyed?
59
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Oodles and gobs, or just a few?
« Last post by Tom Graves on Yesterday at 03:59:20 AM »
A question for all the tinfoil-hat JFKA CTs out there:

How many evil, evil, bad guys were involved, altogether, in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the planting of evidence, the shooting, the planting of more evidence, the getting-away, the film-and-photo-and-XRAY-altering, the wound altering, the casket-switching, and the all-important (and obviously ongoing!) cover up?

Oodles and gobs, or just a few?

Oh yeah, and was it Peter Dale Scott's "Deep State," Jimmy DiEugenio's "National Security State," or Steve Bannon's "Deep State" / "Administrative State"?
60
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: The First Shot
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Yesterday at 02:22:16 AM »
Quote from: Dan O'meara on July 29, 2026, 12:45:32 AM
I asked:

"If you have a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet recovered from Parkland, do share it."

There is no evidence that CE399 was found at Parkland.
The three men involved with the discovery of a bullet at Parkland ALL refused to identify CE399 as that bullet.
O P Wright categorically denied CE399 was the bullet found at Parkland.
CE399 was entered into evidence as the bullet found at Parkland without a single witness identifying it as such.
Tomlinson, the man who discovered the bullet, wasn't asked to identify it during his closed WC interview.

There is not a single scrap of evidence that CE399 was the bullet found at Parkland and lots of evidence demonstrating it wasn't.
Prix like Graves are here to disinform and misinform.
What an unbelievable KGB-loving loser he is.

Each of the people who took possession of the bullet gave evidence that they retained possession until they delivered it to the next person.  That is evidence that can establish continuity of possession.  Tomlinson found the bullet when it fell from a stretcher. He gave it to Wright who delivered it to SA Johnsen who, in turn, gave it to his superior, Rowley after Johnsen flew with it to Washington on 22Nov63 with the bullet in his possession. Rowley immediately gave it to FBI agent Todd who marked his initials on it.  One cannot expect witnesses to be able to identify the bullet from its appearance. That’s why they put their initials on it. But engineers, managers are not crime scene investigators.  Secret Service agents are not, normally, either.

Besides, Wright snd Tomlinson said in 1964, months after last seeing the bullet, that CE399 resembled the bullet they had received.  But, understandably, they could not make a positive identification.  It was not until 1967 when Josiah Thompson showed him a picture of CE399, that Wright said it did not look like the same bullet.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10