Don't waste your time on this guy, Steve. He has been peddling the laughable "Hickey did it" crap on multiple forums and newsgroups for the past many years.

 

The Sprague enhancement is better for bringing out Lovelady's plaid pattern and Shelley's white shirt collar...(And Lovelady's bald spot)...None of these have been doctored and they will appear exactly the same on the original film...

I'm sure this issue would be more solved than it already has been if the original celluloid were gotten and scanned...

The Prayer Man people are cheaters because they hold back and don't participate in further examining the evidence...Instead they ban and censor in order to protect their dirty clique...The Education Forum is all a group of sycophants and friends so when they cheat and with-hold evidence they get encouraged and rewarded on the forum...Being internet hacks, they make it a personal school yard contest that they take a little too much pleasure in but that doesn't stop them from selling themselves as serious researchers...Somehow Larsen managed to enhance Lovelady's plaid bars better than Kamp did and their irregular pattern matched perfectly beyond a doubt ending the issue...When I managed to get a message past the censorship filters the clique sets up for people who disprove them and told Larsen he had just proven the time Frazier was staring in shock at Sarah Stanton instead of admitting this evidence he went back and deleted his photo analysis of the plaid bars...

The two men are obviously Shelley & Lovelady...

The Sprague enhancement is better for bringing out Lovelady's plaid pattern and Shelley's white shirt collar

How is it better?
How is the more washed out image, that has far less detail, better for bringing out fine detail?
How is that better than the far clearer image that has far more detail in it?
What you're saying makes zero sense.
There is hardly any fine detail in the Sprague image except inside the suspicious lighter square that contains the two men.

Why is it none of this fine detail present in the superior 4 Days image or any other version I can find?
No fine detail on the shirt.
No bald spot.

This is clear proof the Sprague image has been doctored.

When the Bell film is ran in full motion, Wiegman only uses his hand to support going up the steps, he is not lying or sitting.
By the way, where did you guys get the full-frame bell film without text? didn't the GIF guy upload the underpass sequence but stabilized?

   Wiegman is Not facing the steps on the Bell Film. He is facing the (W) as he runs/stumbles across the top of the Knoll grass. He has his camera in 1 hand and the other hand is front of him as he stumbles forward while running (R) - (L) across the Knoll grass. The hand in front of him is a reflex action as he stumbles off-balance forward. 

When the Bell film is ran in full motion, Wiegman only uses his hand to support going up the steps, he is not lying or sitting.
By the way, where did you guys get the full-frame bell film without text? didn't the GIF guy upload the underpass sequence but stabilized?

   How about just looking at the level of Wiegman's feet vs the feet of the guy standing to the (R) of the Bench/at the base of the Pedestal? Both Wiegman and this other person are clearly standing at close to the same level on the Knoll Grass. These higher definition JFK Assassination Images make this obvious.
   Wiegman NEVER said he layed across the steps, and No Eyewitness has ever said they saw him laying across the steps. A man wearing a suit and hat, and holding a camera, while being "sprawled" across those steps would certainly be ingrained in the memory of the eyewitnesses inside Dealey Plaza. How many eyewitnesses noted the Newman family being "sprawled" on the ground? Seeing something such as Wiegman laying across the steps would also be memorable.

Are you suggesting this film was altered? And if so why?