JFK Assassination Forum

Royell steered me to a Couch clip which is the best quality I've come across:



I cropped and blew up the two men:



There is a hint of something on the shirt in this image that may be a pattern but I wouldn't have an idea how to get it to stand out.
Maybe someone who knows what they're doing can have a go.

Dear Royell,

Those two guys (one of whom is wearing a suit and a "pompadour" hairstyle just like William Shelley, and the other of whom has a receding hairline, a bald spot, and is wearing a plaid / striped shirt like Billy Lovelady) are not "next to" your mythological "Abandoned Getaway Car."

Twenty seconds after the final shot?

How do you know it wasn't 25, 28, 31 or [fill in the blank] seconds?

The 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Abandoned Getaway Car" was left in a no parking zone for at least three hours?

Gasp . . . did the evil, evil Deep State bad guys eventually come and tow it away, or did one of their agents forget to hotwire it for that long?

-- Tom

If a person gives testimony that is demonstrably incorrect, they could simply be wrong or they could be lying. Perjury is when you give testimony that you know to me wrong and it is a serious crime. Most people when testifying under oath are going to try to give accurate accounts to the best of their ability. Human beings are fallible and don't always remember things exactly the way they happened. I have no reason to believe Witt deliberately falsified his testimony. I believe he testified to the event as best he remembered it. If it doesn't square with the film record, it doesn't prove he committed perjury. It means he had less than perfect memory which is true for all of us.

I guess reading comprehension isn't your strong suit. What is? I have made very clear my positions on any number of issues. There are many things we know because there is a wealth of evidence for those things. We know Oswald fired the shots that killed JFK and wounded JBC. We know Oswald murdered JDT. There is a wealth of incontrovertible evidence to support all of that. There are things we don't know for sure because the evidence is either inconclusive or non-existent. By applying critical thinking to the available evidence, I know what we know and what we don't know. There are issues for which we do NOT have conclusive evidence. The best we can do for those issues is recognize the various possibilities while also recognizing we cannot come to definite conclusions for those things. Not having definite conclusions for some issues, does not preclude us for reaching conclusions for which we have defintive evidence. If you still can't understand what I am saying, try finding a fifth grader to explain it to you.