Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Either the report was bigger than everyone else's, or Earl Warren and LBJ had very small hands.

Because it contained all of the secret communications of the evil, evil Deep State.
52
[...]

Anyone who promotes the works of Mel Ayton and criticizes Linda Pease and/or Comrade James DiEugenio at the so-called JFK Assassination Debate - Education Forum should be applauded, not penalized.
53
Hello, JFK Assassination Forum.

I was just notified about Benjamin Cole's false, defamatory thread about me on your forum, and I think it is important to set the record straight.

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

The first thing I want to make clear is that I am not Anti-Semitic, nor am I a "crackpot."  I'm a retired physician (psychiatrist) and graduate of Brown University and Harvard Medical School.

The second is that Education Forum founder, John Simkin, did not appoint me as a moderator of the Education Forum.

I was asked to help out the EF moderators (now deceased) a few years ago, before they asked Mr. Simkin to return to his forum.

1)  I joined the Education Forum in 2017.  My main interest was the JFK assassination literature, but I had also done some reading about the 9/11 science literature, after reading Laurent Guyenot's book, JFK to 9/11-- 50 Years of Deep State.

     I had posted some commentary on the EF, in the past, about the research of Guyenot and the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

     In response to my references to the 9/11 science literature, Benjamin Cole repeatedly attacked me as an "Anti-Semitic crackpot," while adamantly refusing to study or discuss the scientific and forensic evidence.

      Cole also attacked me for referencing the American Pravda history essays of the Harvard/Stanford polymath, Ron Unz.  I have repeatedly reminded Mr. Cole that Ron Unz does not edit, nor necessarily endorse, the opinions of researchers and journalists who post articles on his Unz Review website.

       Some of the writers who post at the Unz Review are Anti-Semitic, in my opinion.  I disagree with many of their opinions.

       I have been very careful about criticizing Israel and the Netanyahu regime on the Education Forum, preferring to reference criticisms of Netanyahu by Jewish intellectuals like Bernie Sanders and Norman Solomon.
     
       As Bernie Sanders has pointed out, criticism of Netanyahu is not necessarily Anti-Semitic.  Many Jewish people have criticized Netanyahu.

       Nevertheless, Benjamin Cole has persisted in calling me an "Anti-Semitic crackpot."  Frankly, it's libel.

  2)     The moderators at the Education Forum had, repeatedly, penalized Benjamin Cole for posting redundant falsehoods (17 times!) before I ever became a moderator, and before John Simkin had recently rejoined his Education Forum.

       Ben was, most recently, penalized by the Education Forum for posting redundant spam by Mel Ayton, attacking Lisa Pease's landmark investigation of the RFK assassination, A Lie Too Big to Fail.   He insisted on re-posting Mel Ayton's hit piece even after he was asked to cease and desist.

       I hope that this clarification is helpful for the JFK Assassination Forum.

Sincerely,

      William Niederhut, M.D.

       Denver, Colorado
54
Either the report was bigger than everyone elses, or Earl Warren and LBJ had very small hands.

55
On the Trail of Delusion, Episode 31, with Josh Sundloff

Josh has a terrific TikTok channel called Reason and Reality which tackles JFK conspiracy nonsense.

56
PJC--

You have your views, and I have mine.

The Education Forum is moderated by an anti-Semitic crackpot. That's my view, earnestly held.

Efforts have been made within the Ed Forum community to resolve the problem, but were unsuccessful.

See the other thread this forum on a similar topic.

This is my new JFKA-RFKA home, and I post on all aspects of the assassinations here.

Likely, these are my last posts on this lamentable topic; I have other fish to fry, and have said my piece.

57
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Royell Storing on March 05, 2026, 02:25:58 PM »
RS--

Oh, a lot of people don't know Israel and Iran were friends and allies until 1979---and I think they can be again, if Western liberal democracies see this next act through.

Imagine a Middle East planning peace and prosperity instead of how to contain and appease and fear the nuke-addled Islamo-fascist terror regime in Tehran.

Added plus (for TG!): Russia takes a huge whack when Tehran goes down.

    China is also a huge loser. The loss of Venezuela oil + loss of Iran oil puts a big energy strain on China. And Trump is supposed to go to China in a few months. If Trump does go to China, this will be the centerpiece of their "discussion". Per his "Method Of Operation", Trump would hold huge "Leverage".
58
You are way out of line Cole. Coming in here and starting a thread for the sole person of attacking someone on another website is beyond being a dick.   
59
The other alternatives are:
A. Some other person who looked a lot like Oswald was just randomly  walking along the sidewalk and saw Tippit at 10th and Patton and  decided to shoot him.

B. Some other person who looked a lot like Oswald was part of some conspiracy plan to set up Oswald ( the Marxist) by shooting a cop in addition to setting Oswald  up for shooting JFK, The conspirator(s) had 3 main reasons to do so. 1. They hated JFK 2. They wanted a war for profit in Vietnam which JFK policy prevented. 3. They figured that a Marxist arrested and found guilty of killing JFK and a heroic cop would aid their introduction of a Vietnam war against Communism to the public only 3 days after JFKs death.

C. Oswald the Marxist was known by the FBI as well as CIA to be a potential threat and possibly mentally unstable after General Walker was shot and George DeM ( a CIA asset) most likely passed on information about Oswald. Oswald got a job in the TSBD. This information most probably was also known. A simple conspiracy planned by LBJ to have JFK motorcade go past the building that the known Marxist Leftwing Kook worked in. It’s a probability option much the same as knowing about the  other kook, Thomas Arthur Vallee , a USMC trained rifleman whom may have been planning to  shoot  at  JFK in Chicago.



Option A would be a viable option in 2026 due to kooks having demonstrated such violence against cops.
However , it’s unclear if in 1963 the kooks would have randomly shot a police officer just for patrolling around in a quiet neighborhood. Therefore it’s an improbable option.


Option B is way too complicated to get the timing just right that lookalike Oswald is at 10th and Patton while Oswald in TSBD is held in TSBD out of sight between 12:16-12:30 and the exit from TSBD ,the trip to bus and cab , and entering /leaving boarding house, arriving at Texas theater all timed  just right.

Option C is the only alternative that’s simple enough to be a viable option as a CT alternative.
Oswald did the shooting and did escape from TSBD and did randomly shoot Tippit because of purely an amazing coincidence as Oswald was headed via secondary road towards either Texas theater or to the Marsalles Zoo ( probably to jump on a nearby empty freight train boxcar).

The subsequent post event confusion of evidence processing  and Will Fritz negligence was a result of the conspirator LBJ injecting himself into the process by telling Fritz that Oswald was their man. Ruby shooting Oswald before trial was an unexpected fluke. LBJs calculated odds plan was that the Kook Oswald in TSBD would shoot at the POTUS if given an opportunity. A trial finding the Marxist Communist guilty would be even more effective in convincing the public to support a war against the communists in Vietnam. Therefore LBJs simple plan that  Oswald the Marxist will shoot the POTUS if given an Opportunity , would not have been complicated after the fact by hiring or coercing Jack Ruby to shoot Oswald.


60
I sort of lean towards the CT theory that LBJ gave the go ahead to have JFK assassinated, due to  a recording of a phone call between Billy Sol Estes and Carter , where Estes asked if they did it and Carter admits they ( LBJ) had no other choice.

Therefore if LBJ wanted it done, it would be his hit man Malcom Wallace most likely to be the shooter.

But the hit could have been accomplished by Wallace much easier by selecting to shoot JFK while he was a stationary target , giving a speech at a podium.

So I wonder why   Malcom or LBJ would  have contrived to complicate the hit by having Malcom have to carry an MC rifle into TSBD , go up to the 6th floor and shoot at a moving target, and Malcom having to go.back down 6 floors to get out of TSBD.

And the shooter sticking the rifle out the window so far and keeping it sticking out for about 5 seconds after the last shot was fired seems like a totally unnecessary and risky thing to do.

Now a car, a gate, and a one glove cop, may be some new elements to consider, however
I’m not at present able to synthesize these new elements with an LBJ /Malcom Wallace pre planned assassination of JFK.

Maybe Royell has a different selection of conspirators other than LBJ and Wallace whom are the perpetrators . Perhaps he can explain their plan using the TSBD building and shooting at a moving target and so forth that also required a car out front and an open gate and why the one glove cop would  be part of that plan.

This is a yes or no poll.

Who asked you for your opinion on who killed JFK?
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10