JFK Assassination Forum

California:

Prior to 2013, a voter had to be ill or disabled for someone else to return their ballot for them. Plus, that person had to be a family member or a member of the same household.

After 2013, the law was changed. Being ill or disabled was no longer required. A family member or a member of one’s household could return ballots.

In 2016, the law changed again thanks to Assembly Bill 1921. Now, anyone could return another person’s ballot and there was no limit on how many ballots a person could return.

so what?
Voter fraud is approximated between 0.0003% and 0.0025% - no where near enough to make any outcome difference.

The worst thing this POTUS ever did was destroy the freedom of the press and undermine the elections in this country.
Foundations of our democracy  We never had any question or doubt until he came along.

Royell steered me to a Couch clip which is the best quality I've come across:



I cropped and blew up the two men:



There is a hint of something on the shirt in this image that may be a pattern but I wouldn't have an idea how to get it to stand out.
Maybe someone who knows what they're doing can have a go.

   DAN - You did an Outstanding job on this entire thread. Start to finish top notch. I do Not always agree with you, but your positions and the visual aids you supply to support your positions are A-1. YOU and "The Nutty Professor" compliment each other well. And I mean this in a good way. If we were to compile a "TOP 10 Threads EVER", this thread would make that list. Maybe in the Top 5. This thread is without a doubt a very educational and entertaining thread. That is a tuff combination to put together. But, YOU did it. Congrats!

There are plenty of perverts across the political spectrum. John Wayne Gacy was active in Illinois Democrat politics and even had his picture taken with Rosalyn Carter.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/John_Wayne_Gacy_Rosalynn_Carter_1978.jpg

For either party to assert this is only a problem with the other side is absurd.

   The buried photo of Obama and Louie Farrakhan was an early indicator of the Dem Party being anti Jew. Now we got that Jug Head in Maine with a Nazi Tattoo on his chest. And the Dems overwhelmingly nominate him to run for the U.S. Senate. This issue is 98% Dem. Without question. I'm Not even gonna get into "The Squad". ALL Dem's.

same with voter fraud or any other dopey generalization MAGits make.

California:

Prior to 2013, a voter had to be ill or disabled for someone else to return their ballot for them. Plus, that person had to be a family member or a member of the same household.

After 2013, the law was changed. Being ill or disabled was no longer required. A family member or a member of one’s household could return ballots.

In 2016, the law changed again thanks to Assembly Bill 1921. Now, anyone could return another person’s ballot and there was no limit on how many ballots a person could return.

Goodish wordage re Donahue.

And dont forget the goodish book by McLaren extending the goodish work of Donahue.

Yes, Donahue does have his defenders. McLaren is a former Australian police detective. His book and documentary JFK: The Smoking Gun defends Donahue's core conclusions.

We now know that jfk woz hit on the back of the head by lead splatter from Oswald's shot-1 at about pseudo Z105-Z110, which ricocheted offa the overhead signal arm & left 2 halves of the jacket in the limo,

This goes far beyond Donahue's conclusions about the back-of-head fragments and the limo fragments. He put the pavement shot at no earlier than Z145. A shot at pseudo-Z105-110 from the sixth-floor window is wildly problematic and implausible.

& we know that the remnant main slug made a hole throo the floor of the limo.

I don't think we know any such thing. This is pure speculation.

We now know that Hickey fired an accidental auto-burst of at least 4 shots at about Z300-Z312, the first injuring Tague, the last hitting jfk in the head, the 2nd last denting the chrome trim.

No gunfire burst from Hickey from Z300-312 could have caused Tague's wound. Tague was hit long before the head shot.

Now, the chrome dent is very interesting. If we had any evidence that Hickey did fire an auto-burst, it would be entirely plausible to posit that one of his shots caused the deep chrome dent.

The lone-gunman theory has no way to explain the chrome dent. There is no plausible trajectory from JFK's head wounds to the chrome dent--not even close. The WC floated the false claim that the chrome was dented before the assassination, but footage of the limo before the Dallas motorcade refutes this claim. Yet, we still see some WC apologists repeating it.

We now know that Oswald fired just 2 shots, at about pseudo Z105-Z110 & at about Z218.5, & had 1 non-fired bullet remaining.

I don't think we know any such thing. The Zapruder film shows JFK reacting to a wound starting at Z200, as even the HSCA's Photographic Evidence Panel acknowledged, which is part of the reason the panel put the first hit at around Z188-190. This was a crucial, historic admission because the sixth-floor gunman's view of the limo would have been obstructed by the oak tree from Z166-210, which means the first hit did not come from the sixth-floor window.

If Oswald allegedly fired his supposed second shot at Z218, and if his first alleged shot came at pseudo-Z105-110, what shot, pray tell, hit JFK at Z188-190? This just does not work.

And how do you account for JFK's dramatic Z226-232 reaction? His torso is visibly jolted forward and his hands and elbows are flung upward. This is clearly a different hit than the Z188-190 hit.

I am actually open to the idea of a shot occurring during the suspicious break in the Zapruder film that was supposedly caused when Zapruder allegedly temporarily stopped filming at around Z132. Zapruder indicated he did not stop filming the motorcade until after it passed under the triple underpass. It would have made no sense for him to stop filming at Z132 when he could see the limo was only seconds away from turning onto Elm Street. I suspect this portion of the film was removed because it showed reactions to gunfire.

As a side note, I suggest you look at the evidence that Oswald was not on the sixth floor during the shooting. Ideologically, I would have no problem assuming Oswald was one of the shooters, but I think the weight of the evidence shows he was not on the sixth floor when the shots were fired.