JFK Assassination Forum

Yeah that's about the same what they said when Hitler came to power.

You are cheering on a guy who has betrayed you from day one and who will dump you as soon as he has no use for you.

Many people who supported Hitler found out too late what a monster he really was. The same is happening now with Trump.

Trump will no longer be POTUS come January 20, 2029. I love watching the TDS crowd getting their shorts in a bunch worrying about Trump not leaving office when his term runs out. One of the fringe benefits of Trump's victory is seeing the consternation from his haters. I feel their pain and I admit to deriving fiendish pleasure from it. One of my favorites is seeing Jimmy Kimmel break down in tears. It's the only thing he's ever done that makes me laugh. I wish he would do more of it. I might actually start watching his show.

JC-

Probably so, LHO eventually would have been captured, although in the 1960s-era, anyone with a valid-looking passport could leave the country, even through US ports. No computer connections.

Could LHO, with a bleached Fu Manchu and hair, some elevator shoes, and a "valid" passport, leave the US, say after six months or a year?

James "Whitey" Bulger (16 years on the lam): The South Boston organized crime boss went into hiding in 1994 to avoid racketeering and murder charges. He was on the FBI's Most-Wanted list for 10 years, and a $2 million reward was offered—one of the highest for a domestic target—before he was finally captured in Santa Monica, California, in 2011.

But, as you say, LHO's behavior on 11.22 was inexplicable.

I am right because I am able to weigh evidence. I know forensic evidence outweighs eyewitness testimony because the latter has been proven to be unreliable. Forensic evidence, on the other hand, can be tested and retested. If the person doing the testing has made a mistake, it will be there for all to see. The forensic evidence of Oswald's guilt has withstood the test of time. It's as valid today as they day it was collected and analyzed. The WC took the unusual step of getting second opinions regarding the findings of the FBI regarding the forensic evidence. Palm and fingerprint evidence was analyzed by the New York City fingerprint division. Recovered bullets and shells from both the JFKA and the Tippit murder were examined by the sate of Illinois crime labs. The only disagreement I know of is that the Illinois crime lab believed one of the bullets taken from Tippit's body could be positively matched to Oswald's revolver. The FBI found none of the bullets could be matched because the barrel of Oswald's .38 was oversized for the ,38 Special bullets. The true diameter of a .38 Special is .357 which is why a .357 can fired .38 Special ammo. I wouldn't put a .357 Magnum round in a .38 revolver.

I am right because I am able to weigh evidence.

Sorry, but you're wrong because you haven't got a clue about weighing evidence. Stop fooling yourself, as you are not fooling anybody else.

I know forensic evidence outweighs eyewitness testimony because the latter has been proven to be unreliable

BS.. in this case there is no forensic evidence to trump eyewitness testimony. Even if forensic evidence connects shells and bullet fragments to a rifle it tells you nothing about who shot the rifle.

Eye witness is mostly unreliable, but not in every case!

The forensic evidence of Oswald's guilt has withstood the test of time.

No it hasn't, because it doesn't exist

Everything else you have written is BS and needs no reply

He was sure of both and he was wrong about both.

And you know this, how?

Your opinion doesn't trump witness testimony!

My opinion doesn't but forensic evidence does. The bag Frazier saw was found by the sniper's nest and measured to be 38 inches, significantly longer than Frazier's estimate. I'll take the judgement of a tape measure over an estimate Frazier made after glancing at the bag. By his own admission, he said he didn't pay too much attention to Oswald as he was carrying the bag toward the TSBD.

Well you constantly say you are right and that's most certainly not good enough.

Frazier has a lot more credibility than you will ever have. He saw the package. All you have is a self-serving theory for which you can offer no proof other than assumption and speculation.

I am right because I am able to weigh evidence. I know forensic evidence outweighs eyewitness testimony because the latter has been proven to be unreliable. Forensic evidence, on the other hand, can be tested and retested. If the person doing the testing has made a mistake, it will be there for all to see. The forensic evidence of Oswald's guilt has withstood the test of time. It's as valid today as they day it was collected and analyzed. The WC took the unusual step of getting second opinions regarding the findings of the FBI regarding the forensic evidence. Palm and fingerprint evidence was analyzed by the New York City fingerprint division. Recovered bullets and shells from both the JFKA and the Tippit murder were examined by the sate of Illinois crime labs. The only disagreement I know of is that the Illinois crime lab believed one of the bullets taken from Tippit's body could be positively matched to Oswald's revolver. The FBI found none of the bullets could be matched because the barrel of Oswald's .38 was oversized for the ,38 Special bullets. The true diameter of a .38 Special is .357 which is why a .357 can fired .38 Special ammo. I wouldn't put a .357 Magnum round in a .38 revolver.