Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
dang, Tommy, ask a silly question, well………

but to Albert’s credit, I have used my remote viewing skills like them goat-starers did, and can confirm some of his testimony.  you’re welcome, Albert. I’m your forensic witness.

Seriously! Sorry I even asked. Is his name really "Albert" ? Kinda confused on that point..
52
I don't think Prouty and his witnessing can be dismissed on such a weak smearing basis...

Jeez don't tell me you believe Fletcher Prouty too? Is there any outlandish JFK conspiracy theory you DON'T believe?
53

If you have a good sense of Harvey & Lee you will see that both Marina and Judyth Baker would not have likely missed the fact there were two Oswalds...

Dude, come on. Now Marina and Baker BOTH are in on the doppelganger secret? How can you possible believe this.
54


If you have a good sense of Harvey & Lee you will see that both Marina and Judyth Baker would not have likely missed the fact there were two Oswalds...
55
Humm, so I take it you find the idea that Oswald was impersonated to be some wild and specious theory? Are you aware that the two HSCA investigators who investigated Oswald's activities in Mexico City (Ed Lopez and Dan Hardway) came away convinced that someone was impersonating Oswald in Mexico City? Have you read the Lopez-Hardway Report?

How about the several reports from credible witnesses, one of whom was a doctor, who reported seeing Oswald at certain locations in Dallas when the real Oswald was positively known to be elsewhere at those times? Let me guess: All the witnesses were "mistaken," right?
Nowhere in the report does it say they were "convinced" that an impersonation took place. The document says "the possibility" of an impersonation cannot be dismissed not that one did occur.
 
Here is what it directly says about a possible - possible - impersonation (this is from the section looking into the question):

 

Saying "a possibility cannot be dismissed" is not saying they were convinced one took place.

Report is here: https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/lopezrpt_2003/html/LopezRpt_0264a.htm
56

I don't think Prouty and his witnessing can be dismissed on such a weak smearing basis...
57


The Manhattan-based Harvey was educated and intellectual as city people are...He spoke Russian...City people don't drive because they have mass transit...

58
All the ["Harvey and Lee"] witnesses were "mistaken," right?

Dear Comrade Griffith,

Sure, why not?

-- Tom
59
One of the EF moderators to whom you refer accused me of being a CIA disinformation agent. He did so because I presented evidence that L. Fletcher Prouty was a crackpot and an anti-Semite, and because I argued that if anyone fit the bill of a CIA disinformation agent whose job was to discredit the case for conspiracy, Prouty fit that bill perfectly.

Thankfully, the EF recently cleaned house and that moderator has been removed from the moderator staff.
60
yeah, these people that don’t fact-check really annoy me sometimes, relying on something that isn’t true as your premise.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10