JFK Assassination Forum

RS:  I am talking about the dirt road portion of the Elm St Extension.

So why did you bring up the limo turn and traffic signal in the Wegman film?

there are NO BOLLARDS between Officer Harkness and this alleged motorcycle cop.

Yes there are! Not only can you see many of them in the Darnell film, others are made obvious when the motorcycle cop walks behind them.

Here, bollards are outlined in red. Note that one is in Harkness' shadow:


Here, "B" marks where the line of bollards is. You can see that two of them are silhouetted by the MC as he walks behind them:


Here he is a half step later:

        On the (R) we see Officer Harkness.  This is his timeline.

           12:36 - Officer Harkness makes a radio transmission that he is bringing an eyewitness/Amos Euins to the TSBD.

           12:37 - Officer Harkness helps load Amos Euins into Inspector Sawyer's car in front of the TSBD

           12:38 - Officer Harkness secures the back of the TSBD. (This is where we see him above in Darnell Film still frame)

                  It is physically impossible for the motorcycle officer above to be Officer Haygood. Officer Haygood was back at his motorcycle near the Triple Underpass at 12:38 conducting interviews. This was filmed/documented by Mal Couch. "The Nutty Professor" has also submitted a photo which further documents Motorcycle Officer Haygood being near the Triple Underpass during this same time period. The motorcycle cop above is Not Officer Haygood. That is physically impossible. Motorcycle Officer Haygood can NOT be in 2 places at the same time.

   Where have you been? The timeline of Officer Harkness DQ's this being Officer Haygood walking toward and then by him in the Darnell still frame. Officer Harkness being in this Darnell still frame, means the time is 12:38 PM. At 12:38 PM, Officer Haygood is back at his motorcycle near the triple underpass conducting eyewitness interviews. This is a FACT that I have Proven.
   So YOU TELL ME: (1) Specifically, who is this Motorcycle Cop on the Darnell Film? (2) Where is his Motorcycle?

I don't need to answer those questions. You do. In the decades I have engaged with conspiracy hobbyists such as yourself, one of their favorite ploys is to raise a question, and if the answer is an unknown, they think they have made the case for conspiracy. You don't prove anything by raising questions. You have to find answers to questions and then explain how the answer proves conspiracy. Instead, conspiracy hobbyists take the position that if an answer is unknown, that empowers them to assume the answer means there was a conspiracy. That is a totally illogical approach, but it leads conspiracy hobbyists to the answer they wanted from the start.

Your argument is silly in two ways. First of all, you haven't proven the officer is not Haygood. You have asserted it. You think because he had two gloves on in on photo precludes him from having taken on of the gloves off before the second photos was taken. Silly is as Silly does.

Second, even if the one gloved officer is not Haygood, that doesn't even come close to proving a conspiracy. You fail to consider the real possibility, actual the likelihood that it is another DPD officer whose name you don't know. Your failure to identify the officer is not proof of a conspiracy.

   Where have you been? The timeline of Officer Harkness DQ's this being Officer Haygood walking toward and then by him in the Darnell still frame. Officer Harkness being in this Darnell still frame, means the time is 12:38 PM. At 12:38 PM, Officer Haygood is back at his motorcycle near the triple underpass conducting eyewitness interviews. This is a FACT that I have Proven.
   So YOU TELL ME: (1) Specifically, who is this Motorcycle Cop on the Darnell Film? (2) Where is his Motorcycle?

What's the line on the orange loon wiping out Iran tonight?
  anybody check in with the kids? They'll make millions

The last thing Trump wants to do is wipe out Iran. His intention is to inflict enough damage on the country that they capitulate, which would mean opening the Strait of Hormuz and agreeing to abandon their quest for nuclear weapons and long range missiles. While there are those within what's left of the Iranian regime who appear willing to negotiate, the Revolutionary Guard seems willing to fight to the end, rather than capitulate to US demands. This is the same sort of fanaticism we faced at the end of the WWII when Japan's military leaders seemed willing to absorb a US invasion that would have cost millions of Japanese lives, both civilian and military and an estimated half million casualties on the Allied side. That's why Truman had to make the awful decision to use the A-bomb against Japanese cities because he knew it would result in far fewer deaths than invading Japan. The first atomic strike was not enough to make the Japanese surrender and even after the second bomb was dropped, there were hardliners who thought it would be more honorable to fight to the last man than to surrender.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard seems to have taken a similar stance. Even knowing they face annihilation if they refuse to give in, they prefer that to a negotiated settlement that meets US demands. It is virtually impossible to negotiate with people who have that mind set. The only way to achieve a negotiated end to the conflict is to continue to identify, locate, and kill these hardliners until someone with some common sense is able to call the shots. If that means bombing the country back into the Stone Age, so be it. Let's see how willing they are to continue the fight when all they are able to do is throw rocks at us.

I suspect Trump will start with measured attacks against Iran's infrastructure and see if that brings them to their knees. It probably won't at first, but we need to keep intensifying until they cry UNCLE. I have to believe at some point, somebody is going to be in charge with the sense to realize enough is enough, and accept the US terms.   

I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing from Michael Jackson

 

   SHANKS - I have proven that this is NOT Officer Haygood above. You claimed it was. Your current 0-4 record is sad to see.  How about you take a break, and gather your thoughts? Basically take a "Standing 8 count". I take no pleasure in pummeling someone that is "out" on their feet.