Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Even before I saw David Von Pein's excellent website on the SBT, it appeared to me when looking at the Z-film at normal speed that JFK's upward movement of his arms coincideed with his reappearance from behind the sign. It was only after seeing DVP's webpage that I realized there was a one frame delay between his reappearance and the upward movement of the arms. The naked eye can't detect that one frame delay of 1/18 of a second between his reappearance and the upward movement of his arms.

Also when looking are the Z-film at normal speed, it appears JBC's gyrations began almost immediately after he reappeared. His bending and twisting to the right began less than a second after he reappeared from behind that sign.  His arm flip started about a quarter second after he reappeared and his dip to the right occurred about a half second after that.

Aside from Royell now thinking JFK was gagging on a bullet stuck in his throat like a recalcitrant meatball - which was of course entirely predictable from Team Royell - I am still somewhat lost as to what all this has to do with anything.

Nellie Connally, whom most folks here seem convinced was a hallucinatory housewife unworthy of being taken seriously, told CBS "The first sound, the first shot, I heard, and turned and looked right into the President's face. He was clutching his throat, and just slumped down. He just had a look of nothingness on his face." At the WC, she said JFK "reached up to his throat," "had both hands on his throat," and "it seemed to me there was - he made no utterance, no cry. I saw no blood, no anything. It was just sort of nothing, the expression on his face, and he just sort of slumped down." Apart from whether JFK was actually clutching his throat, Nellie's observations seem hard to square with gagging and wiping blood.

In my extensive research of this issue  ::), I did discover that Josiah Thompson and Pat Speer were in agreement way back in 2010 that the Thorburn reflex argument had been a "dead puppy" (Tink's phrase) for years and had been invented by Medical Quack Lattimer and promoted by Lying Fiend Posner to prop up the SBT and disguise the fact that JFK and JBC were hit by different shots. Here is what most folks seem to regard as the definitive refutation of the Thorburn argument: http://www.assassinationweb.com/milam-thor.htm. Based on this, Dr. Payette revises his opinion to "I have no clue and don't really care. What's for lunch?"

It is interesting how consistently - and I mean CONSISTENTLY - the phrase "clutching his throat" is used in reference to JFK and specifically Altgens6 as though it were mandatory. However, at the Ed Forum there were those who pointed out that JFK is not really "clutching" his throat.

Dr. Payette still maintains - while eschewing the term "opinion" - that what we see is in fact a reflex. James Gordon - remember him? - made the following point along the same lines in 2012. He suggested that while what we see may not in fact be exactly a Thorburn reaction, it is a reflex from nerve damage:

I thought I made it clear that the “Thorburn Reflex” was not necessarily my position. I certainly intended to make that clear. Having said that, what is described as this “Reflex” perfectly reflects what we see JFK doing with his arms.

The main point of my previous post was that the strange event of JFK’s arms were a direct consequence of the nerve damage when C7 was struck by the bullet. As I have pointed out the damage to that muscle is so extensive it was bound to have a consequence on the nerve structure attached to these muscle and the spinal cord directly behind the muscles. The reason I raised “Thorburn’s Reflex” was because that state suggests that once enacted it is difficult move the arms. The nerves that cause this don’t allow it. In the image below I have taken a series of frames to illustrate this point. Even with Jackie attempting to move the left arm it will not move. It is only when the head shot takes place, which destroys the entire nerve system, that the arms relax.

What I am trying to point out is that the impact with C7 did not just damage that Transverse Process, it also severely damaged the Intervertebral Disc C06 C07. And that damage had a major impact on the Cervical Nerves. It is that damage that caused the arms to rise and lock. They were only released when the entire nervous system was destroyed or severely damaged by the head shot.


The frames that James references are Z249, 273, 277, 308, 316. His post is here: https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?action=post;quote=181318;topic=5057.21.
52
We're getting near to the point in the conversation where the CT tells the LN to find the supporting evidence for the CT's assertion.

No, we have already arrived at the point where a imaginary "CT" (in the mind of a fanatical zealot LN) has explained the evidence for two wallets and just about all LNs couldn't answer the simple questions asked, leaving us with Mitch who is always playing games and never ever presents any logical explanation or even a shred of evidence. In this case he hasn't even made a point beyond that he can't find figure it out.
54
It's not my problem that you can't figure it out. This is a pointless conversation.
I found out a long time ago that I can't fix stupid

We're getting near to the point in the conversation where the CT tells the LN to find the supporting evidence for the CT's assertion.
55
I'm not suggesting anything. 

I am pointing out that President Kennedy never touched his throat like just about everyone claims when they mention his reaction to the first shot.  Clearly, he never went for his throat.  Ever.  His right hand and arm jerk upward, his hand is open, giving the appearance that his hand is covering his mouth, while his arm is splayed upward and folded at the elbow.
 
Too many people watch the Zapruder film at slower than normal speed because too many people post the Zapruder film onto YouTube at a speed slower than 18.3 frames per second and overlook how fast his right comes up in front of his face to mouth level. The left hand is clearly not touching his throat either. as can clearly be seen.

Even before I saw David Von Pein's excellent website on the SBT, it appeared to me when looking at the Z-film at normal speed that JFK's upward movement of his arms coincideed with his reappearance from behind the sign. It was only after seeing DVP's webpage that I realized there was a one frame delay between his reappearance and the upward movement of the arms. The naked eye can't detect that one frame delay of 1/18 of a second between his reappearance and the upward movement of his arms.

Also when looking are the Z-film at normal speed, it appears JBC's gyrations began almost immediately after he reappeared. His bending and twisting to the right began less than a second after he reappeared from behind that sign.  His arm flip started about a quarter second after he reappeared and his dip to the right occurred about a half second after that.
56
At least my points were supported by evidence.  You just don’t agree with the evidence. Not only is there no evidence of a first missed shot, or that JBC was hit in the back by the same bullet that struck JFK, or that JBC is already wounded in the chest at z226, there is abundant evidence that conflicts with each of those points.

I agree with the evidence. I just don't agree with your FUBAR analysis of the evidence. It is comical that anyone could look at the Z-film and conclude JBC was not hit until Z270.

Many/most CTs argue that JBC was hit some time in the mid-Z230s. While I disagree with their assessment, it is reasonable based on JBC's assessment. It ignores JBC's obvious arm flip at Z226 but it recognizes the obvious gyrations JBC went into following the arm flip. Your scenario is just plain cuckoo.
57
They all reported the Bolton story.


Here's CBS Evening News from last night. Tell me where in it you find the Bolton story:

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/062626-cbs-evening-news/
58
Wrong  Right  Right  Wrong

Your batting .500. That's much better than you usually do.
No, they had the same misperceptions. Do you think the witnesses who said the shots were evenly spaced and those who said the first two shots were closer togather were hallucinating?
At least my points were supported by evidence.  You just don’t agree with the evidence. Not only is there no evidence of a first missed shot, or that JBC was hit in the back by the same bullet that struck JFK, or that JBC is already wounded in the chest at z226, there is abundant evidence that conflicts with each of those points.
59
Putting your faith in legacy media makes even less sense than putting your faith in eyewitnesses. Much of the deception of the legacy media is in what they choose NOT to report as it is in what they do report. They will largely ignore negative stories about people who side with them as they did in ignoring the story of John Bolton's guilty plea to a very serious charge. But they did manage to squeeze in the stories about the escaped giraffe and the cowardly grizzly bear.
They all reported the Bolton story.

Bolton’s case is interesting because he used the documents to defend the foreign policy he helped carry out after Trump began revising history and refusing support to Ukraine. That led to his book that Trump tried to stop.  Trump on the other hand used the horde of documents he took to Maralago to show his friends.
60
I did. It wasn't there.

It's not my problem that you can't figure it out. This is a pointless conversation.
I found out a long time ago that I can't fix stupid
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10