AI is obviously corrupted and only outputs whatever the persons who inputted planned...It is the ultimate propaganda weapon that creates the appearance of advanced objectivity while omitting that which it has been programmed to exclude...That's why they call it "Artificial"...It's junk science and evil people playing god for evil purposes...

AI gathers information from a wide variety of online sources and draws its conclusions from that. It recognizes that there is a clear consensus that Oswald was the assassin, even among CTs who believe he was part of a conspiracy. Those who think Oswald was an innocent patsy as he claimed are the lunatic fringe.

Royell is trying his hardest to ignore that the films in question are an accurate register of reality and that the time that Baker ran to the front door and the time Lovelady & Shelley fast-walked up the extension are seen as they were in the films...

Calvery and Reed had spoken to Lovelady & Shelley at the base of the steps and Calvery and Reed had started up the steps and Lovelady & Shelley had started up the extension...

State govs. Pass criminal codes, court policies. Funding of courts, state police, marijuans penalties, etc.

BTW, Massachusetts 2nd safest state,
Boston pop.  700,000 2025 murders = 24

Louisiana 49th safest state
Shreveport, LA pop. 200,000  2025 murders = 29

https://www.prisonpolicy.org/profiles/LA.html
Incarceration per 100,000 pop.
Massachusetts 241
Louisiana 1067

“Hellscape” safety rankings :
https://wallethub.com/edu/safest-states-to-live-in/4566

People are fleeing the liberal hellscapes for red states.  All the deflections in the world don't change the obvious conclusion that they are doing so due to the failed leftist policies that have made those places unlivable for law abiding American citizens.  The only people who are staying are the homeless, illegal aliens, and criminals.

You guys really are a bitter, angry, and rude bunch of people, aren't you? You become furious when anyone presents you with evidence that contradicts what you want to believe, and, like insolent teenagers, you try to shout it down with insults and summary rejections.

This is MTG projecting his traits onto others.

MG: Sigh. . . .  Seriously? I address this tale in my article as well. It's seriously like you guys are stuck in a time warp and that you are oblivious to research that has been done since the 1960s.

Isn't it incredibly suspicious and unbelievable that Lt. Day failed to take a single, solitary photo of the most important print he would ever process? He took photos of the worthless trigger-guard prints, but not a single photo of the palm print. Why did the FBI fingerprint expert Sebastian Latona say that when he examined the rifle less than 24 hours after Day claimed he found and lifted the print, the barrel contained no prints and did not even look like it had been processed for prints. Yet, Day claimed the print was still visible on the barrel after he allegedly lifted it.

The WC was so suspicious of the palm print's origin that they asked Lt. Day to sign a sworn statement affirming how he obtained it, but Day refused to do so. Humm, why was what?

Typical Griffith Clown crap show. Having proven nothing except his own mindless idiotic babble seems important to him. Unable to process the little things that matter the most. Spell it out, if the rifle was not his why was his palm print on the rifle?

You guys really are a bitter, angry, and rude bunch of people, aren't you? You become furious when anyone presents you with evidence that contradicts what you want to believe, and, like insolent teenagers, you try to shout it down with insults and summary rejections.

Now, the problems with the palm print may seem like "mindless idiotic babble" to you, or you may desperately wish they were such babble, but we know for a fact that the WC did not see them that way, because we know that the WC was so suspicious of how and when the palm print was obtained that they asked Lt. Day to sign a sworn statement affirming his story.

I notice that in your emphatic, insolent, loud-mouthed dismissal of the problems with the palm print, you declined to explain why Latona observed that the barrel did not even look like it had been processed for prints, even though Lt. Day said the print was still visible on the barrel after he supposedly lifted it.

I notice you declined to explain why in the world Lt. Day, in violation of standard procedure and all common sense, did not take a single evidence photo of the most important print he had ever processed in his entire career. Here's a clue for you: He didn't photograph it because it was not on the barrel when he examined the rifle. That's why he took photos of the worthless trigger-guard prints but took no photos of the palm print. It wasn't there yet. That's why he said nothing about the palm print when he turned the rifle over to the FBI. That's why the DPD didn't tell the FBI they had "found" the palm print until several days later. That's why police sources were still telling newsmen on 11/24 that they still had not found Oswald's prints on the rifle.

One reason the WC was so suspicious of the palm print's origin was that Lt. Day offered an utterly flimsy, unbelievable excuse for failing to photograph the print. He said he was just about to photograph the print when he received a call from Chief Curry's office telling him to stop all work on the rifle so the FBI could finish what he had started. He said this call came at around 8:00 or 8:30 PM. However, by his own admission, he took another photograph of the rifle at least half an hour later, at 9:00 or 9:30 PM (4 H 273). Humm, well then, so why, why, why did he not take a picture of the print on the barrel at the same time, especially since he said he believed the print offered the best chance for identification?!

Furthermore, even assuming Lt. Day was told to stop processing the rifle so it could be handed over to the FBI, if there had actually been a print on the barrel, Day would have informed the caller that he needed to take just a minute to take some photos of the print because he had not done so yet and because this was vital to establish the print's chain of evidence, and the caller surely would have agreed and would have said, "Oh, absolutely. If you haven't photographed the print yet, be sure to do this before you hand over the rifle to the FBI."

Heck, if anything, the caller would have chastised Lt. Day for not having already taken a single photo of such a crucial piece of evidence, and would have ordered him to be sure to photograph the print before turning over the rifle to the FBI, in order to establish a legal, valid chain of evidence for the print.

The palm print was authenticated by the FBI as having been LHO’s palm print and was lifted from the barrel of the rifle. Griffith cannot explain it away and it remains a key fact in the possession of the rifle by LHO.

You guys are so rabid and blindly biased that you can't see past your own theories to even understand an opposing view and to comprehend the evidence that supports that opposing view. Now, no one is denying that the palm print was Oswald's. No one. No one has ever denied that. The issue is the evidence that Lt. Day did not even process the barrel for prints, much less find and lift a print from the barrel, and the evidence that the print was placed on the barrel after Oswald was killed.

For readers who want to know more about the evidence that the palm print was planted on the rifle after Oswald was dead, I discuss this evidence at length in my article "Was Oswald's Palm Print Planted on the Alleged Murder Weapon?".