Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
It is easy to "figure it out" when you ignore and dismiss evidence you don't like.
Since you know the evidence so well and like to tell all of the lone assassin believers where they're wrong (but surprisingly not the conspiracists), why not tell us who you believe shot JFK? What does the evidence tell you?

You've been posting for roughly a decade. Nearly ten thousand posts over that time. How about just one post telling us who shot JFK? After all, this is the "JFK Assassination Forum" not the "Oswald Didn't Shoot JFK Forum."
52
A lot of us know what happened on 11/22/63. What puzzles us is why so many people have such a hard time figuring it out.

It is easy to "figure it out" when you ignore and dismiss evidence you don't like.
53
   What about those involved in the Cover-Up? NBC has NEVER released their Original Darnell or Wiegman Films. Until ALL the cards are face up on the table, nobody knows exactly what went down on 11/22/63. Both of those Original Films contain critical information.

A lot of us know what happened on 11/22/63. What puzzles us is why so many people have such a hard time figuring it out.
54
JFK Assassination Short Railroad Yard Scenes With Dallas Deputy Sheriff  Roger Dean Craig - 5 Different Speeds


          The above DPD Motorcycle Cop is Not Officer Haygood as has been believed for 62+ years. Officer Haygood gave WC Testimony that he talked with what he "presumed" was a Railroad Detective and then returned to his motorcycle near the Triple Underpass. On the Darnell Film above, we do Not we see this alleged DPD Motorcycle Cop talking with anyone. To the contrary, the Darnell film shows this alleged cop doing Everything that he can to AVOID Speaking or even getting physically close to anyone inside the railroad yard. He talks with nobody, and does Not head back in the direction of his motorcycle. He walks across the railroad yard and then proceeds toward/down the Elm St Extension. In the direction of the TSBD. NOT back toward the DPD motorcycle parked near the Triple Underpass.
55
MTG-

Yes, the consensus, as seen in a credible recorded witness such as Bowers, is that the last two shots were in rapid succession.

As the TSBD sniper (I suspect it was LHO) was armed with a single-shot-per-bolt-action rifle, that is one reason that the LNT is implausible.

There are other reasons, such the scent of gunsmoke in GK area in the immediate aftermath of the JFKA, Sam Holland's account with visible gunsmoke in the GK, and Gov. JBC's testimony that he was struck by a separate shot from the one that struck JFK, testimony with which his wife concurred.

I have never been able to make head-nor-tails out of the acoustic evidence.

However, Blakey of the HSCA said the acoustics evidence was only one factor in their estimation that there was a probability of a JFKAC, and of a gunshot from the GK.

We disagree on the extent of the JFKAC, and that is fine. I suspect small conspiracy of anti- or pro-Castro Cubans who worked with or manipulated LHO. Maybe just two other people.

But that's just my IMHO. Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.

   What about those involved in the Cover-Up? NBC has NEVER released their Original Darnell or Wiegman Films. Until ALL the cards are face up on the table, nobody knows exactly what went down on 11/22/63. Both of those Original Films contain critical information.
56
SMG-

"Pol Pot was a political leader whose communist Khmer Rouge government led Cambodia from 1975 to 1979. During that time, an estimated 1.5 to 2 million Cambodians died of starvation, execution, disease or overwork. One detention center, S-21, was so notorious that only seven of the roughly 20,000 people imprisoned there are known to have survived. The Khmer Rouge, in their attempt to socially engineer a classless communist society, took particular aim at intellectuals, city residents, ethnic Vietnamese, civil servants and religious leaders. Some historians regard the Pol Pot regime as one of the most barbaric and murderous in recent history."

Everything is hunky-dory with the commies.

The IRGC are nice guys in Tehran.
JFK said this would happen, that if we simply left that South Vietnam would fall and then the other countries in the region would fall like dominoes. Then all of those horrors that communists do would ensue. Communists gonna' do what communists do. Douglass and DiEugenio truly think they are nice people ("liberals in a hurry" as the expression goes) and that the only reason they opposed us was because we, those militarists and neo-fascists in the country, forced them to. If we played nice with them they would reciprocate. This is what they think. And that is what they think JFK thought. How much more history of how communist behave, how they engage in mass murder and repression, must be shown? An entire century of it should be enough. JFK knew this even if they don't.

The very fact that we left in 1973 and the communists continued to wage war - in Vietnam, in Laos, in Cambodia - puts a lie to the claim that they wanted peace, that we could work in good faith with them. Hanoi didn't want peace; they wanted South Vietnam - not in the name of Vietnamese nationalism but in the name of communism (it's why they supported the Pathet Lao and the Khmer Rouge; why would nationalists support communists groups in other countries?). Once we left that's what they got.

57
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Education Forum Goes Off the Rails
« Last post by Tommy Shanks on September 24, 2026, 06:40:47 PM »

Mark David Chapman 1980...

Read 'Who Killed John Lennon?' by British Barrister Fenton Bresler...

You really do believe every silly conspiracy theory in the book, don't you? Kinda wild.
58


Any fool could quote Trump and his campaign promises - most of which he never did...
59

You are cherry-picking quotes in order to distort Kennedy's intention...

You are taking what Douglass spelled-out as JFK placating conventional politics entrenched in US government in order to get elected and misrepresenting them as policy...

DiEugenio and Douglass backed up what they wrote with factual references to what Kennedy was really doing...

There's a very simple way to judge this...Kennedy got assassinated exactly because of his intention to carry out the radical peace initiative with the communists spelled-out in Douglass...
I am quoting JFK on what he wanted to do in Vietnam, on what we needed to do: that is, stay and help South Vietnam defend itself. And also his views about the threat that communists posed to the US. He supported containment, he thought it was necessary. I quoted his *exact* words. I can give you more.

You are quoting James Douglass and DiEugenio on their opinion on what JFK was going to do. For them, when JFK said "A" he meant "not A". When he said he was going to stay in Vietnam he actually mean he wasn't going to say. They have created an imaginary "second" JFK who didn't mean what he said. I am citing history; you are citing conspiracy supposition.

Somehow you think the latter is more credible?
60
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Education Forum Goes Off the Rails
« Last post by Brian Doyle on September 24, 2026, 05:51:04 PM »


Mark David Chapman 1980...

Read 'Who Killed John Lennon?' by British Barrister Fenton Bresler...
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10