Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Bearing in mind that the "getaway" car was 17.5 Feet Long, you're telling me that a 12 Foot long Civil War Canon could also be sitting in this same space and not be filmed by Wiegman? How about a 6 Man Firing Squad? This is how ridiculous this, "It's there, you just can't see it", claim is.

You're still sore that the South lost, aren't you, Sonderführer Storing?

Get over it, dude.

-- Tom

52
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / A question for Storing
« Last post by Tom Graves on March 01, 2026, 10:21:43 PM »
Storing,

Did the bad guys really think they could hop into their very distinctive 17.5-foot long 1958 Pontiac Bonneville and drive it down Elm Street Extension without anyone noticing them and join the surely-bogged-down-by-then motorcade right after they'd killed JFK "from the bushes"?

OMG, WHAT IN THE WORLD WERE THEY THINKING?

LOL!

-- Tom
53
If we could see the entire Darnell Film with the clarity of the above Darnell still frame, a lot of questions would be answered. Like, what is this alleged DPD motorcycle cop NOW holding in his left hand?

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

I think it's a special pistol that the evil, evil, evil CIA gave him to liquidate the patsy, Harvey Oswald (not to be confused with Lee Oswald).

Keep up the good work!

-- Tom
54
Once again, Michael T. Griffith is allowed to spam this forum with endless diatribes touting the acumen of Dr. David Mantik, whose nonsense about forged autopsy x-rays has been exposed time and again by researchers like Pat Speer.
55
You've been completely unable to demonstrate your contention that the motorcycle officer in the Darnell film is not Haygood. When we strip off your misconceptions, your misunderstandings, and your miscontruals, all we are left with is a base assertion that "Haygood didn't explicitly say he was in the rail yards behind the knoll." Which isn't really an argument. So now you want to shift the burden of proof, and declare yourself the victor. A quaint strategy, but the rest of us see right through it.

   The newly discovered Darnell Film Snippet which shows the Elm St Extension jammed packed with people, while at the same time Officer Harkness standing alongside the "One Glove Cop" inside the railroad yard, blows the above blah, blah, blah, all to hell. Officer Haygood made a documented 12:35 PM police radio transmission from his motorcycle at the Elm St curb near the Triple Underpass. Officer Harkness made a documented 12:36 PM police radio transmission that he was headed to the TSBD with eyewitness/Euins in tow. So at what time is this newly discovered Darnell Film Snippet happening? 12:38 PM. That "One Glove Cop" is not Officer Haygood. The timelines of officer Haygood and Officer Harkness make this crystal clear.   
56
I haven’t seen the footage that shows one glove missing from Michael Jackson

 :D :D



 - BUMP -
57
It's Haygood's right hand glove, which he is carrying.

   I Disagree as to that object possibly being a "glove". As you see below, whatever that object might be, it is consistently rigid. It holds its' form as the "One Glove Cop" is in motion toward/down the Elm St Extension. A "glove" would not uniformly maintain its' form while in the hand of a person in motion. From the look of its' consistent shape and size, it looks to me like a flashlight. Like a 60's Boy Scout Flashlight.   
58
    If we could see the entire Darnell Film with the clarity of the above Darnell still frame, a lot of questions would be answered. Like, what is this alleged DPD motorcycle cop NOW holding in his (L) hand? Earlier in the Darnell Film, he has nothing in that (L) hand as he walks along the entire string of train cars. Now, as he advances toward/down the Elm St Extension he suddenly is griping something in his (L) hand. What is he holding in that (L) hand as he slips past Officer Harkness?

 It's Haygood's right hand glove, which he is carrying.
59
The fact that JFK's brain might be missing or that it was not weighed does not change the fact that it was Oswald who put a bullet through that brain.
Conspiracy theorists regard every anomaly as proof of conspiracy when at most it is proof of incompetence. Yes, the original autopsy team was not experienced in forensic pathology and were a poor choice for the autopsy. Had the assassination followed the same procedures that were used for any other homicide, we would not have had these shortcomings. Jackie should not have been given the choice as to where the autopsy should be performed. The widow of any other gunshot victim would not have been given that choice. An experienced forensic medical examiner from the DC area should have been selected to conduct the autopsy. As it was, Jackie chose Bethesda Naval Hospital and the prosectors were experienced in doing autopsies on people who died of cancer or heart ailments. A different standard is required for victims of homicides because of legal requirements. Unfortunately, we don't get a do over for that mistake and are left to make the best of what we do have. The original photos and x-rays were made available to the HSCA FPP and they unanimously agreed with the fundamental findings of the original autopsy team while recognizing the errors of omission that were made.

      It is no accident when you have 3 unqualified but military controlled Dr's doing an autopsy on an assassinated POTUS. This would Not have been the case if the JFK autopsy had been conducted in Dallas. Cue the "body snatchers".
60

Here's what Dr. Greg Henkelmann, a radiation oncologist, has said about Dr. Mantik's OD research on the skull x-rays:

Unlike other evidence, optical density data are as “theory free” as possible, as this data deals only with physical measurements. To reject alteration of the JFK skull X-rays is to reject basic physics and radiology. Dr. Mantik has a PhD in physics and has practiced radiation oncology for nearly 40 years; he is thus eminently qualified in both physics and radiology. His unusual background exposes the government-sponsored cover-up that has deceived Americans into believing that Oswald was a “lone wolf.” It is now far past time to be crying wolf. (Introduction in Dr. Mantik's 2022 book JFK Assassination Paradoxes)

If anyone wants to read about Dr. Henkelmann's education and qualifications, here's a brief summary of his credentials:

https://www.womans.org/findadoctor/gregory-c-henkelmann

Explain how being a radiation oncologist qualifies one as an expert in forensic pathology.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10