DUNCAN - Thanks for posting the above photo.
                   The photo I am talking about is different. It shows Euins amidst a group of people that are closer to/maybe within the parking lot. The train is also further back and you can see several of the passenger train cars.  Also, you can see that Large Arching Structure in the background. This "Arch" can also be seen in film footage shot from Elm St toward the general area where the parking lot ends and the Top of the Triple Underpass begins. I checked the Cancellare photos in the photo gallery here, and the photo I am talking about was not there. There has to be a reason why Euins left his entire railroad yard junket out of the mapping of his movements after the kill shot.

Now we learn that Capitol One closed more than 300 Trump Organization accounts involved in suspected money laundering.
One time, in one article I saw - it alleged real estate transactions from Russian oligarchs. That reference has since been removed.
I see no other reference to what specifically was suspect. This goes back to a probe in 2021. I am amazed it hasn't gotten more tread.

Capital One says it closed Trump Organization's accounts after anti-money laundering probe
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/capital-one-says-it-closed-trump-organizations-accounts-after-anti-money-2026-08-01/

Past Statements before 2016:

Donald Trump Jr (2009); "In terms of high-end product influx into the US, Russians make up a pretty
disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. Say, in Dubai, and certainly with our project in SoHo,
and anywhere in New York. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia."

Eric Trump (2014); "We don't rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia"

I was unable to access the link.

Here is the broken link Video.

You do understand that there is a major difference between you thinking that you know how to weigh evidence and demonstrating that you actually can weigh the evidence, right?

Some people think that whatever they believe in is always correct, when in most cases it isn't.

I KNOW with 100% certainty that LHO fired the shots that killed JFK. I am 99.99% certain he had no accomplices.

If you really knew how to weigh evidence, you would have been able to answer questions (which you can't and don't) and you would actually be able to present a persuasive argument instead of constantly complaining about people that don't share your opinion.

It's almost impossible to persuade CT cement heads.

Yes, I do. That's why I was able to figure out a long time ago that LHO killed JFK and that there is zero evidence he had even a single accomplice. I could be convinced otherwise if somebody could present actual evidence to the contrary but it's been almost 63 years since JFK was killed and the chances of that happening get more remote with each passing year.

You do understand that there is a major difference between you thinking that you know how to weigh evidence and demonstrating that you actually can weigh the evidence, right?

Some people think that whatever they believe in is always correct, when in most cases it isn't.

If you really knew how to weigh evidence, you would have been able to answer questions (which you can't and don't) and you would actually be able to present a persuasive argument instead of constantly complaining about people that don't share your opinion.