Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Wow, what a great example of LN rage and frustration!  :D :D :D :D :D :D

That is what the fibers indicate for anyone capable of adding 2 + 2 and getting the right answer. I guess that leaves you out.

That's just another way of saying; with speculation and assumptions you can reach any conclusion you like (btw I left the quotation marks out so you won't get confused again)

You seem to lack the intellectual courage to actually tell us what you believe.

What I actually believe is that you haven't got sufficient credible evidence to support your wild claims.

You seem to be more interested in playing word games.

Project much?

More trolling. You add nothing to the discourse.

Just as I thought. You can't provide evidence for your claims about the fibers.

I don't need a jury to tell me Oswald murdered two men on 11/22/1963 and you don't need a jury to play your silly games.

What a silly remark. You are the one who is constantly going on about what a jury would do.

The same number as I had before I started engaging with you.

So, you've talked to none.... Thanks for clearing that up.

You've never given any indication you know shit about the case. You're only here to play games. That's pretty obvious.

That's only because you are so self-involved that you are not paying attention.

The fact the [sic] built a museum on the same floor Oswald fired his shots from and created a glassed in enclosure around the location he fired from and installed a webcam there is a better indication of who they believe killed JFK.

Gary Mack once told Dutch reporter Peter R. de Vries that they have never been able to place Oswald at the sniper's nest when the shots were fired. Chief Curry has said something similar. Everybody has an opinion. Your opinion isn't automatically the right one, even if you will never accept that it isn't.

But I will give you this. The 6th floor museum, although promoting the official narrative, is fair enough to allow people who disagree with the official narrative to speak their mind.
A couple of year ago, they interviewed Wesley Buell Frasier, who was clear about how he saw Oswald carry the paper bag. It is now part of their record and that's how a museum should function.
I would have preferred a different approach than to go with the official narrative, but I fully understand why they did. Having said that, an actual museum normally doesn't promote a narrative but just tries to present the facts about what happened.

You don't seem to have a pair either. I respect people who will say what they believe and defend those beliefs honestly, even if I disagree with them. That doesn't include you. You get your jollies by trolling. You've made that obvious.

Tell the truth, weasel. You don't like me because I ask questions you don't like and can not answer. Stop whining and grow up!

I'm done playing your silly ass trolling games. When you grow the stones to tell us what you believe and are willing to support those beliefs, let me know. Until then, you aren't worth the time of day.

And yet another example of how you can't support your pathetic claims with evidence.

Btw, I understand that you are stuck and can't find the way out. I'm not holding it against you.

Go away, troll
52
That figure was generally referred to as "Shadow Man"

     "Shadow Man" has been speculated to be James Files in the process of exiting Dealey Plaza.The Bothun Photo is around 1 minute after the kill shot. If this lady took cover behind the short wall, and then decided to leave, Shadow Man could be her. But, if All of the shots were coming from the TSBD, why would she seek cover on that side of the wall? That wall would Not provide cover from shots being fired from the TSBD sniper's nest. 
53
     That's the same small wall I was referring to in the Bothun Photo. That photo is posted in the "research gallery" on this Forum. There's a dark figure on the other side of the wall as Wiegman is seen filming Motorcycle Officer Haygood coming down Elm St.

That figure was generally referred to as "Shadow Man"
54
Dear Comrade Storing,

I "get it" that your MYSTO "ABANDONED" GETAWAY CAR was parked a little bit behind the "Signal Light Pole" / "No Parking Pole" in Hughes and Martin clips. I'm just saying that from the perspective of the Couch-Darnell and Wiegman films, the front of the very same car is visible to us to the right of the "Signal Light Pole" / "No Parking Pole," and that the reason we can't see it in the latter is because the gaggle of spectators is hiding it from view.

(If it's the same car that's in the National Geographic video, it's a 1958 Pontiac)



Question: Do you think the way James spliced together two half-second-apart Wiegman frames in his Couch-Darnell / Wiegman overlap montage was devious or misleading?

Ya gotta scroll down to it:

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4597.40.html

-- Tom

   So you want this Forum to believe that somehow we are Not Seeing this 17.5 FEET LONG and almost 5 FEET HIGH boat of a Car on the Wiegman Film? And Wiegman filmed this area while turning a corner and panning his camera, which resulted in numerous perspectives of this specific area? That  car is Not on the Wiegman Film. It was Not there. Not Yet!
55
You should go outside.  Talk to girls.  Feel the grass on your bare feet.  Smell the flowers.

 Thumb1:
56
That is what the fibers indicate for anyone capable of adding 2 + 2 and getting the right answer. I guess that leaves you out.
You seem to lack the intellectual courage to actually tell us what you believe. You seem to be more interested in playing word games. I've seen your kind before over the last 35 years. People who troll forums just to play word games without ever saying what they believe because that would require you to support what you say.
More trolling. You add nothing to the discourse.
I don't need a jury to tell me Oswald murdered two men on 11/22/1963 and you don't need a jury to play your silly games.
The same number as I had before I started engaging with you.
You've never given any indication you know shit about the case. You're only here to play games. That's pretty obvious.
The fact the built a museum on the same floor Oswald fired his shots from and created a glassed in enclosure around the location he fired from and installed a webcam there is a better indication of who they believe killed JFK.
You don't seem to have a pair either. I respect people who will say what they believe and defend those beliefs honestly, even if I disagree with them. That doesn't include you. You get your jollies by trolling. You've made that obvious.
I've come to realize you have no beliefs. You're a troll.
I'm done playing your silly ass trolling games. When you grow the stones to tell us what you believe and are willing to support those beliefs, let me know. Until then, you aren't worth the time of day.

Wow, what a great example of LN rage and frustration!  :D :D :D :D :D :D

That is what the fibers indicate for anyone capable of adding 2 + 2 and getting the right answer. I guess that leaves you out.

That's just another way of saying; with speculation and assumptions you can reach any conclusion you like (btw I left the quotation marks out so you won't get confused again)

You seem to lack the intellectual courage to actually tell us what you believe.

What I actually believe is that you haven't got sufficient credible evidence to support your wild claims.

You seem to be more interested in playing word games.

Project much?

More trolling. You add nothing to the discourse.

Just as I thought. You can't provide evidence for your claims about the fibers.

I don't need a jury to tell me Oswald murdered two men on 11/22/1963 and you don't need a jury to play your silly games.

What a silly remark. You are the one who is constantly going on about what a jury would do.

The same number as I had before I started engaging with you.

So, you've talked to none.... Thanks for clearing that up.

You've never given any indication you know shit about the case. You're only here to play games. That's pretty obvious.

That's only because you are so self-involved that you are not paying attention.

The fact the [sic] built a museum on the same floor Oswald fired his shots from and created a glassed in enclosure around the location he fired from and installed a webcam there is a better indication of who they believe killed JFK.

Gary Mack once told Dutch reporter Peter R. de Vries that they have never been able to place Oswald at the sniper's nest when the shots were fired. Chief Curry has said something similar. Everybody has an opinion. Your opinion isn't automatically the right one, even if you will never accept that it isn't.

But I will give you this. The 6th floor museum, although promoting the official narrative, is, unlike you, fair enough to allow and accept people who disagree with the official narrative to speak their mind.
A couple of year ago, they interviewed Wesley Buell Frasier, who was clear about how he saw Oswald carry the paper bag. It is now part of their record and that's how a museum should function.
I would have preferred a different approach than to go with the official narrative, but I fully understand why they did. Having said that, an actual museum normally doesn't promote a narrative but just tries to present the facts about what happened.

You don't seem to have a pair either. I respect people who will say what they believe and defend those beliefs honestly, even if I disagree with them. That doesn't include you. You get your jollies by trolling. You've made that obvious.

Tell the truth, weasel. You don't like me because I ask questions you don't like and can not answer. Stop whining and grow up!

I'm done playing your silly ass trolling games. When you grow the stones to tell us what you believe and are willing to support those beliefs, let me know. Until then, you aren't worth the time of day.

And yet another example of how you can't support your pathetic claims with evidence.

Btw, I understand that you are stuck and can't find the way out. I'm not holding it against you.
57
There's a retaining wall seen in the croft photo.





     That's the same small wall I was referring to in the Bothun Photo. That photo is posted in the "research gallery" on this Forum. There's a dark figure on the other side of the wall as Wiegman is seen filming Motorcycle Officer Haygood coming down Elm St.
58


What I notice in that clip is beginning at about Z250 Jackie seems to turn her attention to JBC and Nellie seems to turn her attention to JFK. It must have been bewildering to both of them.
59
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: JFK Videos
« Last post by John Corbett on Yesterday at 09:32:37 PM »
Interesting. Of course I knew of the SS recreation but this is the first time I saw that reporters were allowed in. I believe the CBS reporter said his name was Lou Wood. He sounded a lot like Cronkite. I noted he said the three shots were fired in under 10 seconds. Apparently the Six Seconds in Dallas myth had not yet been formulated.
60
Yet he said he did not feel pain until he got to Parkland and got out of the car.  So the expression on his face is not pain.  Perhaps it is fear - the fear, having just heard a rifle shot, that an assassination of the President was underway. If only we had evidence that this is what he did after JFK started reacting to the shot through his neck.....

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10