JFK Assassination Forum

  (9) The "Pristine" Bullet was actually traveling "BACKWARD", per John Corbett. 

Yup. That's what the evidence indicates.

A pristine bullet is one that hasn't hit anything. CE399 ceased being a pristine bullet once it entered JFK's back. A Carcano bullet does not remain stable after passing through soft tissue. It will tumble which explains why it is damaged at the base of it rather than the nose. This isn't exactly rocket science.

  Trump just says what most people are afraid to say. That's why he consistently defies the polling and has been elected POTUS 3 times. Boys in girls locker rooms, Boys competing against girls, wide open borders, these are issues that Trump bluntly spells out. The vast majority of the voting public agrees with him. The Dem's want to shut him up any way they can, even though he is a Lame Duck. Trump's "straight talking" brings out into the open the absurdity of the Dem Party Policies. 
  And Trump is not afraid to continue pointing out the 2020 Election was rigged. People KNOW that election was crooked, just as the recent Calif Primary was. Same M.O. employed for both elections. Count alleged ballots endlessly until the Dem Candidate stuffs the box enough to turn the election around.

The term "lame duck" gets tossed around loosely these days. Initially, it referred to an outgoing Congress the new Congress was voted into office and when it was sworn in. It was also applied to the outgoing POTUS. Originally, both the new Congress and the new POTUS were sworn in on March 4. During that time the current Congress and POTUS have full powers. Usually the sessions just clean up loose ends with spending bills and the Senate can act on confirmations of presidential appointees. The 20th Amendment moved the inauguration of the POTUS to January 20 and the new Congress taking power on January 3. It also shifted the task of confirming the Electoral College vote to the new Congress.

Trump is not a lame duck and will not be one until after the 2028 presidential election. If he loses either the House, Senate, or both, he will have reduced power but he will not be a lame duck. We will simply have divided power which has happened many times in the past> When that happens, the POTUS and Congress have to negotiate with one another to pass legistlation rather than having one party be able ramrod spending bills into law.

There’s a book out that says UM was covertly filming the assassination in order to help alter the Zapruder film which implies Zapruder was in on the assassination. Crazy as it is, it makes more sense (at least the filming part) than the signalman or dart shooting theories.The umbrella does rotate as if following the limo. But that is just because the man holding it was undoubtedly doing the same.

But I think the umbrella was used as a symbol.

So Abe was in on the assassination, filming it so his film could be altered later, and Louie was making his film to assist in the altering of Abe's film ... which obviously did not have to be made at all and would not have to have been altered if it had not been made. And this was all done because the conspirators wanted a film of the assassination so that, after having been altered, it would conclusively show there was no frontal gunman as long as no one ever spotted the alterations. And Abe was allowed to live until 1970, and Louie until he was 90, and Louie came forward voluntarily in 1978, because this all deflected suspicion from what had actually taken place.

"Have I got that right, Perry?"

"Exactly, Della."

Roll the credits.

Do you understand the word "specifically"?

Yes.

Given the widespread belief in Zapruder film fakery, it is not “self-evident” that it is nonsense.

There is a poster on the EF that pushes this using pages of mathematical calculations purporting to show the film was altered. I think he and perhaps one other person understand what he is trying to say. Most people stop asking questions about it. But if it has math, it MUST be right.

I think it is self-evident nonsense. If one dives immediately into the bewildering "evidence of alteration," which is what they want you to do because then you are playing on their turf, it can start to sound halfway plausible. If one steps back and asks, "Wait a minute, in what meta-narrative of the JFKA does this make any sense? Explain to me why they needed to do this and why they would have done it the way you say they did." - well, then it all falls apart. It's very much like - as I know from considerable experience - debating with a Flat Earther or Young Earther. As long as you stay on their turf, their "evidence" is sorta-kinda persuasive. When you step back and say "wait a minute, bub," it's complete nonsense. I had always assumed the whole Flat Earth thing was tongue-in-cheek, wink wink nudge nudge, folks just enjoying being different and having fun. Noooo, not at all. 84% of Americans believe the earth is spherical, while the rest either believe it is flat or have their doubts. Does this mean the Flat Earth is not self-evident nonsense? It is not self-evident nonsense only to the 16% whose cognitive faculties are not tracking in the channels of normality, at least on this issue and probably many others.

(Apropos of the current Ed Forum Follies, I participated on an active forum called White Horse Theology that went completely poof overnight - no warning, no explanation, just poof. Before it went poof, I was astounded at the number of participants who had intelligent things to say about philosophy and theology but who were also Flat Earthers and Fake Moon Landing-ers. They became positively irate if you dared to suggest these beliefs were just a bit irrational. And, of course, they would inevitably point to the not-insignificant number of people who believe these things.)

I sometimes sound like a John Orr groupie, which I'm not, but there is a theory that hangs together. He accounts for Oswald, he accounts for what occurred and why, he accounts for the physical evidence. It's internally consistent, even if one doesn't find it persuasive. You have to confront his evidence and arguments. You can't just say THAT MAKES NO SENSE.