"Comrade"? This nuttiness again? What kind of a wingnut are you? Where do they find you people? It is indeed fair to ask, "Why do JFK assassination forums draw so many nut cases?" As I've told you before, if you knew anything about my politics and ideology, I'm the last person you'd call "comrade."

So this is your answer to the facts I pointed out about the problematic trajectories and physics involved with your explanation of the chrome dent and the Tague wounding?

When someone points out the impossible aspects of the absurd theories you guys float to uphold the lone-gunman theory, you either duck and dodge with one-liners like yours or you double-down on absurdity.

Claiming something is impossible is quite different from proving something is impossible. You are constantly doing the former while never doing the latter. Why should anyone take seriously?

Just a thought but is there a chance Meyers and Holland and the so-called experts were just luring you in to make you look bad. It is so easy to rule this out as being factual that it is hard to believe anyone could fall for this absurd theory. Yet you and Corbett took it all in hook, line, and sinker.

You seem to think you are in the mainstream here. The reality is you are the outlier. You are a one-percenter. That's about how many people think there were only two shots. Far more people think there were more than 3 shots than think there were only 2. From the beginning, the earliest reports said 3 shots were fired at JFK's motorcade. That was the consensus of the people who were in Dealey Plaza. Specific witnesses, JBC, Bennett, Williams, Jarman, and Norman said there where 3 shots. The physical evidence indicates there were 3 shots. For some idiotic reason, you choose to believe Oswald started with an spent shell in the chamber even though there is no evidence of that, only your silly assumption.

Like almost every single podcaster that hosts Kamp...

Kamp now has Iler as a promoter...

A monopoly...

Gloria Calvery was the main meter...

She and Carol Reed reacted in an adrenaline rush of panic after seeing Kennedy's brains blown out in front of them and they ran back to the steps...

Don't imagine that took more than 17 seconds...

Couch/Darnell has generally been accepted as being 25 to 30 seconds after the shots...

Kamp believes Couch/Darnell is 17-20 seconds after the shots...

They know, or at least they should know, that a bullet struck JFK's upper back two inches to the right of his spine and exited from near the center of his throat. Their animation showed that bullet would have struck JBC somewhere depending on where they positioned him. They moved him from various positions from directly in front of JFK to well to the left of JFK. They showed the bullet striking JBC just to the left of his right armpit when JBC was slightly to the left of JFK, exactly where he was when the bullet hit. Since we know where JBC was actually struck, logic would dictate he must have been slightly to the left of JFK when the bullet struck him just to the left of his right armpit. Since they provide no explanation for why they determined the SBT was impossible, we are left to guess. My guess is their simulation validates the SBT. It does not refute it.

                                     "...........logic would dictate he must have been............"


                            The above is  It is Not FACT. It flies on the Ed Forum. NOT HERE!