John, Clint Hill did not jump off the follow-up car till after the head shot. The shot he heard running to the limo sounded different he said and matches the other witnesses bang bang testimony. it also matches the two largest blur episodes on the Z film.

Clint Hill was running toward the limo before the headshot. Because the limo was moving forward, there wasn't much closing speed, but he was already in motion.

Although he was told differently, the only shot he heard while running was the headshot. He said the shot had a metallic sound which indicates to me one of the sounds he heard was a fragment striking the windshield frame.

To the best of my recollection, he was telling his story at the Sixth Floor Museum but I will have to find that program to verify it.

What does that have to do with probable KGB mole Bruce Leonard Solie, father-figure-requiring James Angleton's confidant, mentor, and mole-hunting superior?

Nothing.... just reacted to your experience with Wikipedia gatekeepers.
I believe this was the wife of the Ted you are looking for, his page does not include a bio.

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/145165700/sophia-kleparski

From WikiTree:

Bruce Leonard Solie (1917 - 1992)

Born 10 Nov 1917 in Sumner, Trempealeau, Wisconsin, United States

Died 23 Dec 1992 at age 75 in Rockville, Montgomery, Maryland, United States


In the 1940 census. the name of the hired hand was Ted Karpaski, or some-such thing.

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G9M1-D7D1?view=index&personArk=%2Fark%3A%2F61903%2F1%3A1%3AK7VL-C1H&action=view&cc=2000219&lang=en


This is the article I wrote about Solie which was rejected by Wikipedia "because not enough established authors have written about him" (LOL!), and which its subsidiary, EverybodyWiki, published without my knowledge.

https://en.everybodywiki.com/Bruce_Leonard_Solie

Thank you.
It took at least two years until other Wikipedia editors stopped deleting this from former Gov., Gray's wiki bio. The argument was it was dismissed as original research.
I kept creating other articles until it no longer was! I just felt two candidates of Nazi grandfathers in one California recall election was one too many!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_Davis

....Davis's father, an advertising manager at Time Inc. and an alcoholic, was the son of businessman William Rhodes Davis.[6]...

[...]

ME: How much of the bullet that struck JFK in the head was never found?

Perplexity AI: Most of the head‑shot bullet was never recovered; only a few small fragments were found, so the majority of the original 6.5 mm Carcano bullet mass is missing.

Official fragment recovery

Parkland and the limousine yielded only a handful of metal pieces clearly associated with the fatal head shot. Contemporary descriptions and later ballistics work describe:

Two larger jacket/lead fragments on the front seat floor of the limousine.

Several much smaller lead specks seen on the autopsy skull X‑rays and removed as tiny fragments.

One documented fragment weighed about 2.89 g and included part of the lead core, while another weighed about 1.36 g, together still far short of a complete bullet.

How much is “missing” in mass terms

A full 6.5×52 mm Carcano military round typically uses a bullet weighing about 10.4 grams (160 grains). The documented larger recovered fragments from the head shot add up to roughly 4.25 g combined, plus only minute specks beyond that. This means on the order of 6 g or more of bullet mass—well over half, and probably closer to two‑thirds—was never recovered in identifiable form.

Modern finite‑element ballistic reconstructions use these fragment masses and locations, along with skull damage patterns, specifically because most of the bullet’s mass is unaccounted for and must be modeled rather than directly measured.

Context within the broader evidence

For the fatal head shot, the record thus consists of two moderate‑sized fragments plus numerous tiny metallic particles, not anything approaching an intact or nearly intact bullet.

As for Altgens 6, I cannot force you to admit you can see what you don't want to admit you can see. Roy Schaeffer noticed the windshield damage in Altgens 6 way back in the 1960s. Anthony DeFiore also identified windshield damage in Altgens 6 and provided high-quality enlargements of the photo showing the damage. Dr. Mantik has likewise identified windshield damage in the photo and in the same area noted by Weldon, DeFiore, and Schaeffer. But, I'm confident you guys will continue to insist you don't see it.

Name‑dropping crackpots doesn’t do much for your argument, I'm afraid. If the damage in the photo really were as obvious as you keep insisting, wouldn't you have been able to show it graphically by now?