JFK Assassination Forum

Dear Royell,

You recently sarcastically asked on another thread if I have a problem comprehending what James' use of the term "unequivocal match" means in the context of identifying your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" in Wiegman.

Not at all, Royell.

Having only recently taken a close look at the shadows on the 1958 Pontiac Bonneville in Hughes and compared them to the shadows being cast many minutes earlier on the object between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora Man" in Wiegman, James has shown us that said shadows are so similar in their gross aspects as to definitely and unequivocally prove that the object between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora" in Wiegman is nothing other than the front portion of the aforementioned 1958 Pontiac Bonneville.

In other words, after a long and complicated analysis of a complicated situation, James has proved that his original intuition was correct -- your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" was there all along!

By the way, Royell, thank you for admitting that shadows are falling on something between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora Man" in Wiegman.

Hopefully, you don't think (sic) that that "something" is a car parked on the other side of Elm Street Extension . . . or [fill in the blank].

-- Tom

You've got three hulls and only two bullets. That's a Big problem. This "lost bullet" stuff is David Copperfield worthy.

Just because we don't know everything doesn't mean we need to ignore what we do know. We know where Oswald's second and third shots struck. Nothing that could have happened with that first shot changes the fact Oswald's second shot hit JFK in the upper back and went on to seriously wound JBC. His third shot struck JFK it the back of the head causing an unsurvivable massive brain injury. We have proof of that.

There are a number of things we don't know and probably never will. We don't know Oswald's motive nor do we need to know in order to prove he was the assassin. He would be nice to know but because he never admitted to what he did, he never would have told anyone why he did it. He didn't leave behind a manifesto explaining his actions and there was no social media in those days which often gives clues as to the motives off modern day crackpots.

If you want to be anal and take the position that the case is unsolved because we can't prove every single detail, that's your choice. I'm perfectly content knowing that Oswald was the assassin and there isn't a scrap of evidence indicating he had even a single accomplice in his crime and I really don't care where his first shot went.

Dear Royell,

You asked if I have a problem comprehending what James' use of the term "unequivocal match" means in the context of identifying your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" in Wiegman.

Not at all, Royell.

Having only recently taken a close look at the shadows on the 1958 Pontiac Bonneville in Hughes and compared them to the shadows being cast many minutes earlier on the object between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora Man" in Wiegman, James has shown us that said shadows are so similar in their gross aspects as to definitely and unequivocally prove that the object between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora" in Wiegman is nothing other than the front portion of the aforementioned 1958 Pontiac Bonneville.

In other words, after a long and complicated analysis of a complicated situation, James has proved that his original intuition was correct -- your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" was there all along!

By the way, Royell, thank you for admitting that shadows are falling on something between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora Man" in Wiegman.

Hopefully, you don't think (sic) that that "something" is a car parked on the other side of Elm Street Extension . . . or [fill in the blank].

-- Tom

Do you have a problem comprehending what "unequivocal match" means?