Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thanks Lee.  I wonder if Vegas got their slogan from them?

Dan, looking at a map of Dallas the following is evident.

- South from Love Field and Parkland is in the general direction of DP and the Sheraton
- Redbird looks to be West of DP
- The Sheraton looks to be East of DP or slightly NE
- Parkland is approx. SW from Love Field
92
JFK Assassination General Discussion & Debate / Re: James Files Truth or Fantasy?
« Last post by Mike Orr on January 22, 2018, 05:14:04 PM »
James Files was due to be released from prison sometime this spring .To listen to Files speak about Nov 22 and the shot that he took to blow out the back of JFK's head makes one think that Files could have been involved. He implies that Charles Nicoletti was shooting frpm the TSBD and that LHO never fired a shot from the TSBD. It seemed that Files dropped a lot of names while talking about that day but that all the names he dropped were those who were already dead. I'm a believer of the blasted out back of the head on JFK , but that's just the way I see it. I've watched the You Tube confession by Files and there is a lot to be said about a lot of things that happened that day . If someone was telling us the truth about that day , we might not believe it because there has been so many different scenarios .
93
JFK Assassination General Discussion & Debate / Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Last post by Richard Smith on January 22, 2018, 04:31:43 PM »
I'm surprised our resident nitwits haven't suggested that Oswald's jacket wasn't found in the theatre because there is no evidence that anyone searched for it.  Maybe it is still there somewhere like Frazier's two-foot long bag in the TSBD or Oswald's rifle at the post office.  It's laughable to watch these kooks dance like circus monkeys around the obvious evidence and then deny they are suggesting a vast conspiracy even though the implications of what they are suggesting mean that almost everyone - including many random people whose testimony they otherwise rely upon - intentionally lied or planted evidence to frame Oswald.  And they take themselves so seriously.  Like ghost hunters. 
94
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Released file regarding the Sheraton Hotel in Dallas  Note how much is missing.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Thanks Lee.  I wonder if Vegas got their slogan from them?
95
Released file regarding the Sheraton Hotel in Dallas  Note how much is missing.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
96
JFK Assassination General Discussion & Debate / James Files Truth or Fantasy?
« Last post by Lee Wotton on January 22, 2018, 02:57:52 PM »
Does anyone have any cited evidence to prove James Files account as false?
97
JFK Assassination General Discussion & Debate / Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Last post by Tom Sorensen on January 22, 2018, 02:10:54 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login




Not at all, Burt saw the same man in the same light coloured jacket as everybody else and just like everybody else Burt saw Oswald head towards the corner of Tenth and Patton and the same jacketed man with a gun was positively identified running down Patton.



JohnM

Fine, we then have the same man

1. Passing Guinyard on the east sidewalk southbound onto Jefferson

2. Passing Callaway on the west sidewalk southbound onto Jefferson

3. Seen by Burt taking the alley westbound

4. Seen by Markham crossing the vacant SW corner lot, jumping a fence to the alley.

Conventional science doesn't allow that.

EDIT>>>>>>>>

Supplementary offence report from POE and JEZ has interesting info on escape route as does report to Curry...

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

They have 6-8 witnesses all saying the suspect was running east (or west?) in the alley between 10th and Jefferson.

Oh.....his jacket was brown, according to Markham.




98
JFK Assassination General Discussion & Debate / Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on January 22, 2018, 12:34:23 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You really don't understand do you?, you put your theory on the table as your first response.

Exactly, because you have no argument.

Your theory that I'm incorrect requires evidence! Well?


I've had enough, you haven't even come close to refuting my original statement and presenting any relevant evidence is obviously beyond you, anyway Martin your continual downer comments are a real sad reflection on who you are, you're just not worth it.



JohnM

You really don't understand do you?, you put your theory on the table as your first response.

Lol... my first response was that you, as usual, were telling a lie.

Exactly, because you have no argument.

Unlike you, I'm not insecure and do not require constant confirmation, so I'll gladly leave you your delusion of grandeur

Your theory that I'm incorrect requires evidence! Well?

My statement that you are not correct is not a theory. It is fact....

I've had enough, you haven't even come close to refuting my original statement and presenting any relevant evidence is obviously beyond you, anyway Martin your continual downer comments are a real sad reflection on who you are, you're just not worth it.

Oh Johnny, you still don't get it, do you now? Just how naively stupid does one have to be to think you can persuade WC critics by presenting nothing more that the same old WC arguments to them over and over again. Because that's what you do all the time. You're like a vending machine that dispenses the same old stuff every time a button is pushed.

You are not here to argue. In fact, you don't know how to discuss and argue... You are here to repeat over and over again the same old rubbish you were given by the WC and Bugliosi no matter how often it has been debunked or exposed as a misrepresentation. That's all you do and all you know how to do. There is no point in arguing with you because your answers (mostly copy/paste or a gif) are always predictable and by your standards, nobody will ever come close to refuting anything you say, because you will automatically dismiss everything you don't like, no matter how relevant or correct the information is that you have been given.

   
99
JFK Assassination General Discussion & Debate / Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Last post by Tom Sorensen on January 22, 2018, 11:50:18 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login



What planet are you on?, of course we are dealing with the mountain of Jacket evidence because you are in no way prepared to deal with the rest of the evidence, just take it slowly slowly.

Thanks for reinforcing that the mountain of jacket evidence is just one of the mountains of evidence that you need to climb.



JohnM

If it's in the volumes it's evidence no problem there.

That volume of evidence also shows that your jacket took several escape routes.

Your sidekick Bill Brown bailed that problem way back, can you deal with it?
100
JFK Assassination General Discussion & Debate / Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Last post by John Mytton on January 22, 2018, 11:38:07 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You're referring to your list of witnesses seeing a light colored jacket or some other mountain?




Quote
You're referring to your list of witnesses seeing a light colored jacket

What planet are you on?, of course we are dealing with the mountain of Jacket evidence because you are in no way prepared to deal with the rest of the evidence, just take it slowly slowly.

Quote
or some other mountain?

Thanks for reinforcing that the mountain of jacket evidence is just one of the mountains of evidence that you need to climb.



JohnM
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]