Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Prayer Woman
« Last post by Alan Ford on June 22, 2018, 09:33:52 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Oswald walks back up to the 2nd floor lunch room where Carolyn Arnold sees him at 12:25...Baker & Truly see Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch room at 12:31:15...

But Baker's testimony puts LHO outside the lunchroom when Baker first sees him! What do you believe LHO was doing outside the lunchroom?
92
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Oswald's High School
« Last post by Matt Grantham on June 22, 2018, 08:47:41 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Progeny, not prodigy

Thanks Bill Somewhere in the back of my mind I felt something was a little funny I do take pride, or something similar, in my vocab, so this is a major demerit I did know the difference as soon as you mentioned it, so perhaps it is more of a neuron glitch than not actually not knowing the word. An F up for sure, but today I am cutting back on my pain killers
93
 Thanks Dennis For sure very relevant and something I had not heard of, I, or others may not acknowledge this on every post you put up, but with the quality of your posts I imagine you know this to be the case
94
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Oswald's High School
« Last post by Bill Chapman on June 22, 2018, 08:38:43 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I heard back from Jim Hargrove thanks to some help from one of the members here My main question was of course whether there was any effort to get DNA from some of the prodigy involved His advice read the book look at the website Oh well

Progeny, not prodigy
95
General Discussion & Debate / Re: The Backyard Photos Have Insomnia
« Last post by Richard Smith on June 22, 2018, 08:37:02 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You're obviously clueless about how the legal system works. No surprise there. If you can't support the claim that LHO had the BYP taken and developed, and you can't, then legally they don't exist as evidence. You're sunk. 🚣

It isn't what Caprio doesn't know about the legal system that is concerning.  It's what he knows for certain that just isn't so that is really alarming. 
96
General Discussion & Debate / Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Last post by Matt Grantham on June 22, 2018, 08:20:13 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Paul. You write gibberish. I'm guessing you speak it as well. Try again in actual English. By the way, the childish laughing images after every line don't help, in fact I suspect they distract from whatever it is you are trying to say.

  I believe he might be from another country. Good luck with most people from this country ever being able to express themselves in a second language as well as Paul does That is not a license to write anything, but at least you might acknowledge this could be part of the problem
97
General Discussion & Debate / Re: The cramped decoy snipernest
« Last post by Michael O'Brian on June 22, 2018, 08:12:07 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Paul. You write gibberish. I'm guessing you speak it as well. Try again in actual English. By the way, the childish laughing images after every line don't help, in fact I suspect they distract from whatever it is you are trying to say.

OMG not another W.A.S.P for us to put up with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Why don't we just rename the forum .W.A.S.P .com

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
98
Jack.

Apologies but your answers all in italics was inducing vertigo, so l will ask here.

What differentiating criteria did the WC use in order to show MICHAEL, RUTH and MARINA the stained CE 142 and/or the replica unstained paper bag as opposed to NOT showing the same paper bags to MOONEY, HILL or FRITZ?

The only difference l see, were that the first three were outside the TSBD whereas the last three were inside the TSBD and in a location where one would have expected them to have seen a 38 inch paper bag.

Would you agree that ALL six people didn't see any paper bag even remotely resembling (in color, size and shape) to either CE 142 or the replica bag?

99
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Prayer Woman
« Last post by Larry Trotter on June 22, 2018, 07:23:52 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Sorry to see you're still playing catchup, Italics! We all know the testimony you reference. Unlike gullible you, however, we also know that testimony does not equal proof. The evolving story told by Baker & Truly is just that----------a story, an agreed narrative whose purpose was the elimination of LHO's alibi.

You still haven't answered my question, so I'll rewrite it in your language in hopes that this might facilitate comprehension on your side:

Do you, MrLarryTrotter, believe, as in lend credence to the claim, that MsSarahStanton, an employee of the TexasSchoolBookDepository, a concern whose salient building was located at 411ElmSt, that latter being a street in Dallas, that locality being a city of Texas, a State in the nation known as TheUnitedStatesofAmerica, saw one LeeHarveyOswald, the now deceased accused in the matter of the shooting of MrJohnFitzgeraldKennedy, USP, and the wounding of JohnConnally, Governor, at 12.30pm CST, a small number of minutes prior to said shooting at/near the recreational lunchroom on the second floor of said building holding what was identifiably a small bottle of 'coke' in his hand? For the record, and in the interests of provable research, I wish to state that by 'hand' is meant no more and no less than a 5-digit body part at the end of an arm.
And how does your question relate to the post, that you, Ford, quoted, which referenced testimony by ML Baker and RS Truly?
Before you make "answer demands", you might review this thread to confirm you have answered questions, appropriately, that were asked of you, AlanFord.
100
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Prayer Woman
« Last post by Brian Doyle on June 22, 2018, 07:06:59 PM »

Stanton sees Oswald by the stairs in front of the 2nd floor lunch room at 12:18...Oswald goes to the Domino Room where he sees Norman and Jarman...Oswald walks back up to the 2nd floor lunch room where Carolyn Arnold sees him at 12:25...Baker & Truly see Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch room at 12:31:15...The long-sleeved lunch room Oswald descends the back staircase and exits the rear...He is seen by Frazier walking up Houston and crossing at Elm... Jeraldean Reid sees a second Oswald exit through the offices... Roger Craig sees the T-shirt Oswald get in the station wagon...


Over on the Education Forum the thread has been hijacked by Bart Kamp and the original topic filtered out so Bart can now host the thread while making trivial corrections on totally unrelated points (that are based on false claims that go unchallenged by the Prayer Man dominators)...The moderation sees this as "very happy with the current state of affairs on the forum"... Geesh...
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]