JFK Assassination Forum

Funny that Hill described the back of the head specifically, which just so happened to be what witnesses at Parkland drew when describing the wound they saw...Those drawn images were clearly in the rear occiput...

JFK was face-down when Clint hovered over him - which would anatomically expose the rear of the head and not the top...

Well, except for the large occipital plug of hair, scalp, skull, and brain that Clint Hill saw up close in the rear seat and looked into the large void cavity it left in the back of JFK's head in the back seat of the limo while he hunkered over him...

Rubbish.  MRs,. Kennedy had the closest view of what was missing from his head.  She told Theodore White that she was trying to hold the TOP of his head down, trying to keep his brain in his head. Read the interview.  Clearly, the large defect was in the top, not the rear or side of the head.

Since the Heroes have stopped coming out the woodwork to lay their acid sarcasm on my thread, I will start to delve into the details of what I believe to be the truth that completely contradicts the explanation that Lee Harvey Oswald was the assassin of JFK.  The evidence I have to present is the Zapruder film itself.  Before I get started, I just want to say that we all owe a great debt of gratitude to Mr. Abraham Zapruder for filming the JFK Assassination.  Had he not done so, there would be no reason to doubt the official explanation that Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK.  It is only because Abraham Zapruder gave us an eye witness view of the assassination that we, some fifty odd years later, can see with our own eyes who killed JFK that completely contradicts the official story.  Specifially, Zapruder gives us an eye witness view inside of the Limousine so we can see the assassination take place as if it were happening just yesterday instead of way back in 1963.  It is amazing what a person can understand just from watching this scene as it plays out, as we will come to find out.  First, please find a stabalized version of the Zapruder film, one that does not jerk around making it hard to see what is happening.  You can find these on Youtube.  Find a slow motion version of the film also.  It helps to be able to view the scene in slow motion so you can clearly see what is happening inside the Limousine.  In my explanation, the entire assassination happens inside the Limousine, so its important to clearly see what is happening inside of it before, during and after the assassination.  The Zapruder film tells a story very different from that of Lee Harvey Oswald being the assassin, which I will cover in detail.  Stay tuned. 

Mr. FRITZ. He said he had a Coca-Cola.

"He said he HAD a Coca- Cola"

Here it is, for all you LNer's who say that Lee purchased the coke AFTER the encounter with Baker and Truly....

Lee HAD the Coke at the time  of the encounter....  He purchased it PRIOR to the encounter....  That means there would not have been enough time for Lee to travel from the sixth floor window to the second floor lunchroom and buy a coke before Baker saw him in the lunchroom.

My interview with Stanton's relatives shows Oswald had the Coke prior to the shooting and therefore was downstairs by the Coke machine in the lunch room...It is being ignored not by the Lone Nutters but by the DiEugenio-led CT-er's who are like little boys who don't want to admit it scotches their nutty Prayer Man theory...What is probably the most important evidence in decades is being deliberately ignored in order to enforce some silly internet pecking order that is enforced by censorship and incompetent gate-keepers who protect their favorite posters...

The main point here is Ball tries to induce Fritz to say Oswald went upstairs to get the Coke...Fritz wouldn't bite because he knew Oswald told him he was in the lunch room...Now you know why they needed to do the police station basement job so badly on Oswald...

DiEugenio was a strong opponent of the Coke...His reaction to this is to ignore it and stay quiet because it refutes his BS...

Storing, do the research!  MARY MOORMAN SAW THE PICTURE AFTER SHE PULLED THE THING OUT OF HER CAMERA!  NOTHING and I mean NOTHING was altered according to her!   Get off that damn soapbox and stop spreading manure!

If we work backwards we know the rear occipital wound was photographically covered-up in the autopsy photos...So what else was covered-up?