Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Bentley & McDonald
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on October 16, 2024, 10:09:48 AM »
Bentley & McDonald The Men Who Captured Lee Harvey Oswald 1963


92
https://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/2024/10/fact-checking-morley-press-conference.html
Thanks for the review. He's really flailing here.

And, quelle surprise, Morley repeats the Win Scott claims made in his (Scott's) manuscript.

Right after the assassination, Scott's top aide/routing officer Anne Goodpasture pored over the photos taken of people entering the Soviet Embassy and selected one she thought possibly may have been Oswald (since he had phoned the Soviet Embassy that day, Tuesday, October 1). The CIA station, e.g., Goodpasture, at that early time didn't know what Oswald looked like. As she later said it was a mistake to do since she didn't know who the person was. But again, she didn't know at that early stage what Oswald looked like. So she sends the photo to Dallas.

If they were "closely monitoring" Oswald as Scott claimed and had taken numerous photos of him then why would Goodpasture send a photo that's clearly not Oswald to Dallas? Didn't she know, as routing officer for the photos, what Oswald looked like? From the ones Scott supposedly received? Why not send those photos of Oswald? But again as she said, at that time she didn't know what Oswald looked like. The same Oswald that Scott claimed to have been "closely monitored" while in Mexico City? This makes no sense at all.

Shorter: Scott was making it up.

94
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: Sam "Skinny" Holland
« Last post by Royell Storing on October 15, 2024, 03:43:10 PM »
    Along with Holland's eyewitness account from his High Ground position, is evidence that lays in the background. What we See during this interview is that W-E section of picket fencing that runs parallel to Elm St is Well Behind (N) of the Black Dog Man Nook. This is also evident in the Dulles Photo Op's that were taken of him atop the Triple Underpass. Same goes for the Willis Photo revealing the W-E picket fencing was (N) Behind the Black Dog Man Nook. Today, the Corner where the W-E picket fencing meets the N-S picket fencing now extends (S) Beyond the Black Dog Man Nook. This moving of the picket fencing impacts any  acoustic testing of possible shot(s)/shooter(s). I believe, the moving of the picket fencing also confused Gordon Arnold when he demonstrated his physical position near the picket fence corner during his segment on "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" 25 yrs After the JFK Assassination. Along with the moving of the picket fencing, the (N) Elm St light posts have been Moved, the Stemmons Sign has been Removed, the R.L. Thornton sign has been Removed, the tree standing close to the running Willis Girl has been Removed, the TSBD Landing has been Expanded, and on and on and on this "makeover" goes. The bottom line here is that JFK Assassination crime scene has been Severely Altered.   
95
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Sam "Skinny" Holland
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on October 15, 2024, 02:43:22 PM »
96
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Royell Storing on October 14, 2024, 03:42:48 PM »
Kacklin' Kamala and "Tommy Boy" Walz are starting to come unglued.  You can fool some of the people some of the time as they say but you can't hide a couple of incompetents for an entire campaign.  They may still win due to the relentless efforts of the media, justice system, and political establishment that would have overwhelmed anyone other than Trump but it's going to be close.  And big mo is on Trump's side coming down the stretch.  The polls are improving.

   I'm not a big "polling" guy, but the "polls" do consistently corroborate 1 thing. Bogus Ballots having been previously counted. Biden's consistently horrible poll numbers over his close to 4yr term are due to his Never having received 81+ Mill Legit 2020 votes. Same goes for Sen Tester/State Of Montana 2018, and Sen Sinema/Arizona 2018. Both Tester and Sinema have polled under 50% for their 6yr terms. Sinema's polling numbers were so consistently horrible that she is Not even running for re-election. Tester is running for re-election, but he too has horrible poll numbers. He will lose on Nov 5. Trump gets ragged All the time for failing to generate 50+% in any poll, but Trump NEVER received over 50% of the popular vote in 2016 or 2020. Trump was in the upper 40's in both of those elections. Trump's 2016/2020 Trump vote count numbers/%'s do match his polling numbers. This corroborates the Trump vote count in both of his elections as being Legit. The Trump vote count totals are attached to real people. Real People that can/do get "polled". The Biden, Tester, Sinema vote counts are artificially inflated. They have votes that are Not attached to real people. Therefore, these "Ghost Votes" can Not be polled. This is why Biden, Tester, and Sinema have consistently been and continue to be crashing with their polling numbers.   
97
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Richard Smith on October 13, 2024, 02:42:55 PM »
cant think of anyone MORE incompetent than the Trumpster!

LOL. "Harvey Brammer's" first post on a JFK assassination forum is to criticize Trump.  I wonder which of our long-lost loons is using this alias. 
98
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Harvey Brammer on October 13, 2024, 04:37:49 AM »
cant think of anyone MORE incompetent than the Trumpster!
99
Steve,

I believe you have covered it perfectly. I think the manuscript, rather than an "autobiography" as it is often described, was a vehicle for Scott to spout off without having to be 100 percent adherent to facts although there are undoubtedly elements of truth there. I don't believe there ever were any photos and the CIA bureaucrats simply messed up. Of course, CTs believe the agency is all powerful and infallible so they had to have photos. Yes, Morley has fallen a long way from his glory days in the late nineties. A real shame.
Morley says any suggestion that Scott made up the Oswald photos account in his manuscript is "unsupported". That's true if, among other things, you ignore the statements by Anne Goodpasture and Phillips, both of whom testified that they saw no photos. They would most certainly, it seems to me given their jobs, to have seen any such photos. Goodpasture testified that she was in charge of routing the photos; that is the photos went through her. And if you read the other parts you'll see that Scott is simply making things up, making claims about what he knew about Oswald before the assassination that were only learned later and after it.

Anyway, if Morley wants to be a conspiracy advocate - to pore over this material and plunk pluck out those pieces that support his "the CIA did it view" and ignore any contradictory evidence - then fine; but he's simply not, at this point, a neutral assassination researcher by any measure.
100
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / New Oswald Resource
« Last post by W. Tracy Parnell on October 12, 2024, 08:42:41 PM »
If you have any interest in Oswald's early life check out:
https://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/2024/10/my-timeline-of-early-life-of-lho-now.html
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]