Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Lame attempt. The actual evidence, you know the stuff you LNers ignore, shows that a conspiracy occurred. An accused person is not required to name or show who actually committed the crime to be found innocent.

You LNers would be better suited in Nazi Germany with your standard of law and justice.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
When the insults come out you know that they are sunk.

I guess by your own admission, "you are sunk"...

lol

Oh, and BTW, not you, or anyone other CTer, has proven anything with regards to this case.
92
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Z-317 shows no rearward blowout
« Last post by Ray Mitcham on August 21, 2018, 02:45:04 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Did you even look at his analysis, he didn't just say "Abracadabra" and come up with some biased paranoid conclusion(as above) but every step of his work is detailed and can be replicated by anybody to validate his results.

JohnM

Why did he study just one photo?

And his report  is  based on poor conclusions.
"Hany Farid report3.3. Posture
“It has been argued that Oswald is leaning so far to the left as to be physically implausible. Our 3-D model allows for arbitrary views of Oswald’s body and measurements of his posture. Shown in Figure 7 are four renderings of Oswald’s body taken from the front, back, and left and right sides, each of which look qualitatively reasonable. The tilt of Oswald’s body was measured to be a physically plausible five degrees from vertical.”

Only problem is Farid was measuring the tilt on a photo which itself was out of tilt. On correcting the tilt, the angle that Oswald is standing is nearer to be a physically implausible 10˚ from vertical NOT 5˚.
93
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
He doesn't have to?

lol

I guess all the CTers here are wasting their time then.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Lame attempt. The actual evidence, you know the stuff you LNers ignore, shows that a conspiracy occurred. An accused person is not required to name or show who actually committed the crime to be found innocent.

You LNers would be better suited in Nazi Germany with your standard of law and justice.
94
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
He doesn't have to. The WC claimed that LHO did it alone and failed miserably to support it.

He doesn't have to?

lol

I guess all the CTers here are wasting their time then.

Thanks for pointing that out.
95
General Discussion & Debate / Re: What are the holes in Donahue's Theory?
« Last post by Rob Caprio on August 21, 2018, 02:32:35 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
He proposed that the fragments from the Oswald rifle found in the front of the limo were from a missed shot that hit the pavement. In 2000, histological analysis disclosed that the had human skin tissue attached.

Some reasons to dispute a CE-399-SBT can be found in this post I made: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

There’s no reason to believe that anyone actually smelled gunpowder. The context of hearing gunfire would alter the manner in which the brain processes olfactory information, making exhaust fumes (for example) be perceived as gunpowder (predictive coding theory).

Donahue used the double-bang to evidence his idea, yet his model has 3 well spaced shots.

There’s other reasons to dispute the theory.

From the "Oswald rifle." 🤣😂😃😅
96
Not all nuts are assassins but most assassins are nuts.  Oswald was clearly a few fries short of a happy meal.  It is going down the CTer rabbit hole, however, to use his mental state as a means of proving guilt since there is no conclusive way to demonstrate any connection.  Suffice to say his background was consistent with being a political assassination.  Just another brick in the wall of guilt.   The rifle is the definitive piece of evidence in this case.  It is linked to Oswald and the assassination.  There is no good work around for that for CTers except preposterous theories that involve dozens of folks from different walks of life all somehow conspiring to link Oswald to the rifle.  Including old Lee himself since he helpfully posed for photos with it, carried a false ID in the same alias as used to purchase it, put his prints on it, and made an unexpected visit to the location where he kept it the night before the assassination.  The evidence demonstrates that he was guilty.  His bizarre mental state is just a cherry on top.
97
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
How would you characterize his behavior in Mexico City when he met the Soviet KGB officers in the Soviet consulate? They all described him as very emotional, distraught, on the verge of some sort of nervous breakdown.

Here's one account of one of those agents: "It was clear that behind the table sat a man [i.e., Oswald] with an overstimulated nervous system that was on the verge of breakdown. There was no purpose to speaking with a person who was in such a state."

Another, a senior agent named Oleg Nechiporenko, said this: Oswald cried out, "I am afraid . . . they'll kill me. Let me in!" he sobbed, and with that pulled a revolver out of his jacket."

And this:  "When Nechiporenko told Oswald that he could only get a visa in Washington in a process that would entail a four-month wait, Oswald shouted, "This won't do for me! This is not my case! For me, it's all going to end in tragedy."

Either he was acting or this was a man on the verge of some sort of mental breakdown. You're not going to convince anyone to give you a visa by behaving like this.

First you have to cite the supporting evidence that supports the claim that LHO went to Mexico City. Well? Hint: Don't look in the twenty-six volumes as it isn't there and the WCR is not evidence.
98
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Well, you see, there's a fairly basic problem here.

You have yet to present a viable alternative.

He doesn't have to. The WC claimed that LHO did it alone and failed miserably to support it.
99
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
There’s little to no evidence that LHO was mentally unstable.

He was quite smart but socially awkward and introverted. Despite that he still found a wife and made friends wherever he went from the Marine Corps to Russia...

How would you characterize his behavior in Mexico City when he met the Soviet KGB officers in the Soviet consulate? They all described him as very emotional, distraught, on the verge of some sort of nervous breakdown (and they all said the man they met was indeed Lee Oswald and not an impostor).

Here's one account of one of those agents: "It was clear that behind the table sat a man [i.e., Oswald] with an overstimulated nervous system that was on the verge of breakdown. There was no purpose to speaking with a person who was in such a state."

Another, a senior agent named Oleg Nechiporenko, said this: Oswald cried out, "I am afraid . . . they'll kill me. Let me in!" he sobbed, and with that pulled a revolver out of his jacket." He too said Oswald appeared to be on the verge of some sort of breakdown.

And this:  "When Nechiporenko told Oswald that he could only get a visa in Washington in a process that would entail a four-month wait, Oswald shouted, "This won't do for me! This is not my case! For me, it's all going to end in tragedy."

Either he was acting or this was a man on the edge of some sort of mental breakdown or crisis. You're not going to convince anyone, it seems to me, to give you a visa by behaving like this. In fact, just the opposite will happen; you'll be rejected.

Let's remember the evidence that shows that he repeatedly beat Marina (and it''s not just her accounts). The Oswald defenders don't like that - they don't like any critical comments about him - but too bad; the evidence is powerful that he was a wife abuser. Is that evidence proof of some sort of mental condition, brain damage: no, but it's evidence that he could be a violent person.


100
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Psychiatry is a branch of clinical neuroscience (dealing with functional disorders of social, cognitive and affective function). Psychology is the scientific study of mental and behavioural phenomena, and is closely allied with relevant neurosciences. Neither discipline fails to meet the criterion of science, which you wouldn’t even know given they actively and enthusiastically reject science to protect your silly dogma.

The findings of the neurological papers provided were consistent in large samples, which shows your highly illiterate and incredulous.             

The brain imaging findings and the neurobiology remain unexplained by you, or are you a crackpot dualist now? How’d his frontal lobe survive glucocorticoid bombardment?

Your IQ can only be expressed in negative numbers.

When the insults come out you know that they are sunk.

Neurology and psychiatry are two different things. Neurology is a science and a medical study of the brain and the nervous system. Psychiatry is a study of human behavior. It is educated guesswork based on standards for how humans are supposed to behave.

You have produced NOTHING to show that LHO was violent as you have falsely claimed. The fact that you have ignored the fact that the parents of the children in the Paine neighborhood had NO fear of allowing their children to play with LHO and his daughter is proof that he was not violent.
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]