91
JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate / Bentley & McDonald
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on October 16, 2024, 10:09:48 AM »Bentley & McDonald The Men Who Captured Lee Harvey Oswald 1963
https://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/2024/10/fact-checking-morley-press-conference.htmlThanks for the review. He's really flailing here.
Kacklin' Kamala and "Tommy Boy" Walz are starting to come unglued. You can fool some of the people some of the time as they say but you can't hide a couple of incompetents for an entire campaign. They may still win due to the relentless efforts of the media, justice system, and political establishment that would have overwhelmed anyone other than Trump but it's going to be close. And big mo is on Trump's side coming down the stretch. The polls are improving.
cant think of anyone MORE incompetent than the Trumpster!
Steve,Morley says any suggestion that Scott made up the Oswald photos account in his manuscript is "unsupported". That's true if, among other things, you ignore the statements by Anne Goodpasture and Phillips, both of whom testified that they saw no photos. They would most certainly, it seems to me given their jobs, to have seen any such photos. Goodpasture testified that she was in charge of routing the photos; that is the photos went through her. And if you read the other parts you'll see that Scott is simply making things up, making claims about what he knew about Oswald before the assassination that were only learned later and after it.
I believe you have covered it perfectly. I think the manuscript, rather than an "autobiography" as it is often described, was a vehicle for Scott to spout off without having to be 100 percent adherent to facts although there are undoubtedly elements of truth there. I don't believe there ever were any photos and the CIA bureaucrats simply messed up. Of course, CTs believe the agency is all powerful and infallible so they had to have photos. Yes, Morley has fallen a long way from his glory days in the late nineties. A real shame.