Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Off Topic / Re: Streets of Philadelphia
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 04:14:43 PM »
Cohen's former attorney testified yesterday that Cohen lied about the payments as part of a deal to avoid jail.  The Stasi-like prosecutors in NY threatened to imprison Cohen and members of his family unless he gave them information on Trump.  And so he did.  Still no crime even if all the allegations are true.  Trump broke no law in using his own money to pay someone to not speak about a consensual affair.  He was actually the victim of blackmail.  It is not "falsifying" business records to characterize such payment as a legal expense.  His attorney was involved in the deal.  It was a legal expense.

It is not "falsifying" business records to characterize such payment as a legal expense.  His attorney was involved in the deal.  It was a legal expense.

Thank you for this display of total ignorance.
2
The pipes could be the issue if one of them
had hot water flowing thru it.

The SE window gunmans exact firing stance is unclear to me still (  crazy after all these years heh)

Maybe the gunman was sitting on the box at first and then burned himself as he fired his first shot , at approx z223. ?

But the shooters reaction from the pipe burn perhaps had  only a slight effect on his aim
so that the 223 shot aimed at the head , instead hit JFK in the back. So there was no missed 1st shot, just a slightly off target shot that still hit the body of JFK.

After this pipe burn (or obstruction)of the pipe , did the gunman take up some other kind of firing stance before he fired off 2 more shots rapidly together about 4 secs later?

If it were not for Harold Normans description of hearing the clack clack noise which suggests a bolt action rifle, then the 4 sec spacing of all 3 shots that Norman also  demonstrates , would indicate that a semi auto rifle was more probable than a bolt action rifle to be able to fire 3 shots rapidly, especially the last 2 which most witness heard “back to back”.

 An obstruction causing the gunman to miss would fit nicely with a theory of semi auto rifle being used and the gunman firing 3 rapid shots. The gunman , having had his aimed head shot at Z220 thrown off from either a pipe or other obstruction when he pulled the trigger at Z222 ,  adjusted his firing position slightly afterwards, while still tracking the target with his good quality scope mounted correctly on his good quality semi auto rifle.

He fired about 4.8 secs after his missed head shot at Z223 and fired 2 shots rapidly at Z313.

The 2nd shot was the head shot at Z313, followed immediately by the 3rd shot a split sec after Z313, which because of “muzzle rise” from  firing rapidly, caused that shot to fly over JFKs head, and over to the curb near to Tague (by the Triple underpass)

A projectile fired from a semi auto rifle with different composition of metals than the MC rifle 6.5mm bullet, thus may explain the anomaly of metallic element analyzed from the curb not matching the typical 6.5 mm bullet from the MC rifle (in Tom Aleya film lifted from the 6th floor by Lt. Day) and alleged to be the rifle fired by the SW gunman by the WC.

It may also explain CE 399 MC bullet  having been substituted for a bullet that came from Gov Connallys leg, ( or replacing the one found on a stretcher) which bullet was of different caliber than 6.5 mm or was not  a type which could have been fired by an MC rifle even if it were 6.5 mm, because of cartridge size.


The most stable position (by far) available at that location would have been sitting on box D and using the Rolling Readers box on top of box C as a support for his left forearm. Based on my experiments, the western most pipe (electrical conduit) would have been a factor for an early shot (~Z133). The corner of the other Rolling Readers box that was sitting on the window ledge would have also been a factor for an early shot (~Z133). While sitting on box D neither the conduit or the corner of the window box should have been a factor for a shot much later than ~Z133.
3


Given the way the flag is flapping, it appears to be attached to something on its right (i.e. west) side.

And given that we have just seen---------a mere couple of seconds earlier in Hughes-----------the black man down by the white west column raise an empty left hand to wave at P. Parade:



:  it appears the only person who can possibly be waving this flag is the white man in the reddish shirt standing directly behind that black man

 Thumb1:
4
Off Topic / Re: Streets of Philadelphia
« Last post by Richard Smith on Today at 12:34:54 PM »
Cohen's former attorney testified yesterday that Cohen lied about the payments as part of a deal to avoid jail.  The Stasi-like prosecutors in NY threatened to imprison Cohen and members of his family unless he gave them information on Trump.  And so he did.  Still no crime even if all the allegations are true.  Trump broke no law in using his own money to pay someone to not speak about a consensual affair.  He was actually the victim of blackmail.  It is not "falsifying" business records to characterize such payment as a legal expense.  His attorney was involved in the deal.  It was a legal expense. 
5
Off Topic / Re: Streets of Philadelphia
« Last post by Richard Smith on Today at 12:30:14 PM »
When you worship Putin and Xi as much as you do, why are you still living in a country you clearly hate?

Maybe I can move to "Europe."  It is actually Ukraine Joe and his clown show that are destroying the US.  He is staging a promo for a TV show while China and Russia are becoming allies.  Old Joe has actually done something even Karl Marx couldn't do.  He has brought China and Russia together in an alliance against the US.  And over a place that most Americans have never even heard of and couldn't find on a map.  Many of whom in the disputed region are of ethnic Russians who would no doubt prefer to be part of Russia instead of dying in an endless war.  But the wars must go on and on.  Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Ukraine.  Almost continuous war over the last 60 years.  The politicians and their paymasters are getting rich.   
6
Hmmm............

7
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When the SN was built
« Last post by Zeon Mason on Today at 04:23:43 AM »
Rowlands description of the gunmans clothing does not fit Oswald because Rowland describes the outer shirt  with a collar,  as being white or a very light blue.

Now that does not necessarily rule out Oswald having taken off his reddish brown shirt and wearing some other light blue or white shirt (with collar) unbuttoned, and exposing his white T shirt, while theoretically holding a rifle at 12:15 near the SW window 6th floor TSBD.

It just introduces yet another complication to the actions and movements of Oswald in this theoretical scenario of going up to 6th floor at 12:12, seen at SW window 12:15 holding a rifle then back down to 2nd floor lunchroom to be seen by Carolyn Arnold at least by 12:17, then back up to the 6th floor before 12:23, and also Oswald able to have identified Norman and Jarman which is more probable if Oswald was in the Domino room at 12:23- 12:25.

Somewhere in there, Oswald changed reddish/pinkish/ brown shirt to wear light blue shirt then back again to r/p/b shirt which he then was wearing as (allegedly) seen by Baker not later than 90 sec post shots in the 2nd floor lunchroom.

Now since Mr Jerry Organ has corrected the distance being 280 ft, (my error of 140 ft, due to the WRONG scale which is on the 1963 Dealey Plaza Map) , there may still be a question if at that distance of 280 ft that Rowland could see a scope even if the shirt of the gunman was white (or light blue) and provided more contrast.

8
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Why the first shot missed
« Last post by Zeon Mason on Today at 03:02:52 AM »
The pipes could be the issue if one of them
had hot water flowing thru it.

The SE window gunmans exact firing stance is unclear to me still (  crazy after all these years heh)

Maybe the gunman was sitting on the box at first and then burned himself as he fired his first shot , at approx z223. ?

But the shooters reaction from the pipe burn perhaps had  only a slight effect on his aim
so that the 223 shot aimed at the head , instead hit JFK in the back. So there was no missed 1st shot, just a slightly off target shot that still hit the body of JFK.

After this pipe burn (or obstruction)of the pipe , did the gunman take up some other kind of firing stance before he fired off 2 more shots rapidly together about 4 secs later?

If it were not for Harold Normans description of hearing the clack clack noise which suggests a bolt action rifle, then the 4 sec spacing of all 3 shots that Norman also  demonstrates , would indicate that a semi auto rifle was more probable than a bolt action rifle to be able to fire 3 shots rapidly, especially the last 2 which most witness heard “back to back”.

 An obstruction causing the gunman to miss would fit nicely with a theory of semi auto rifle being used and the gunman firing 3 rapid shots. The gunman , having had his aimed head shot at Z220 thrown off from either a pipe or other obstruction when he pulled the trigger at Z222 ,  adjusted his firing position slightly afterwards, while still tracking the target with his good quality scope mounted correctly on his good quality semi auto rifle.

He fired about 4.8 secs after his missed head shot at Z223 and fired 2 shots rapidly at Z313.

The 2nd shot was the head shot at Z313, followed immediately by the 3rd shot a split sec after Z313, which because of “muzzle rise” from  firing rapidly, caused that shot to fly over JFKs head, and over to the curb near to Tague (by the Triple underpass)

A projectile fired from a semi auto rifle with different composition of metals than the MC rifle 6.5mm bullet, thus may explain the anomaly of metallic element analyzed from the curb not matching the typical 6.5 mm bullet from the MC rifle (in Tom Aleya film lifted from the 6th floor by Lt. Day) and alleged to be the rifle fired by the SW gunman by the WC.

It may also explain CE 399 MC bullet  having been substituted for a bullet that came from Gov Connallys leg, ( or replacing the one found on a stretcher) which bullet was of different caliber than 6.5 mm or was not  a type which could have been fired by an MC rifle even if it were 6.5 mm, because of cartridge size.
9
Off Topic / Re: Streets of Philadelphia
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 12:56:41 AM »
In the midst of endless war and the leader of China meeting with Putin, the Biden White House staged a press briefing today featuring the cast of the show "Ted Lasso."  When a reporter from Africa tried to ask a relevant question and direct the briefing back to planet Earth, he was chastised.  He apparently has never been allowed to ask a single question.  What a clown show.  Putin and Xi must be laughing their backsides off in Moscow.  They can't believe how far the US has fallen under Ukraine Joe.  Weakness and incompetence at every turn.

When you worship Putin and Xi as much as you do, why are you still living in a country you clearly hate?
10
Off Topic / Re: Hunter Biden laptop
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 12:54:21 AM »
Again, what story relating to Hunter Biden other than the laptop has ever been associated with Russian disinformation?  What do you think Ukraine Joe believed he was being asked about?  There could never be such a thing as a fact if you believe that a baseless possibility suggests sufficient doubt to preclude ever reaching any conclusion.   That is contrarian defense attorney nonsense. Even the leftist rag Wash Post has confirmed that there is evidence to charge Hunter for tax and gun charges.


"Federal agents believe there is enough evidence to criminally charge Hunter Biden with tax crimes and with lying about his drug use when he bought a handgun in 2018, the Washington Post and CBS News have reported."

As predicted there is no answer here to my question. Again, what facts and evidence am I avoiding?

Even the leftist rag Wash Post has confirmed that there is evidence to charge Hunter for tax and gun charges.

"Federal agents believe there is enough evidence to criminally charge Hunter Biden with tax crimes and with lying about his drug use when he bought a handgun in 2018, the Washington Post and CBS News have reported."


Perhaps you shouldn't believe everything that's written in a newspaper.

Who cares what Federal agents believe, when no charges have been filed?

There are Federal agents who believe there is enough evidence for the wide range of criminal activity of Trump Inc. as well, but unless charges are brought it's all just opinions. 

And what has Hunter Biden's alleged tax crimes and lying about his drug use to do with the alleged "corruption" and foreign money transfers of "Biden Inc" (whatever that is) that you were ranting about earlier? If Hunter Biden cheated on his taxes and used drugs, then prosecute him, but don't pretend it has something to do with his father or his family!
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Mobile View