JFK Assassination Forum

cant think of anyone MORE incompetent than the Trumpster!

LOL. "Harvey Brammer's" first post on a JFK assassination forum is to criticize Trump.  I wonder which of our long-lost loons is using this alias. 

Steve,

I believe you have covered it perfectly. I think the manuscript, rather than an "autobiography" as it is often described, was a vehicle for Scott to spout off without having to be 100 percent adherent to facts although there are undoubtedly elements of truth there. I don't believe there ever were any photos and the CIA bureaucrats simply messed up. Of course, CTs believe the agency is all powerful and infallible so they had to have photos. Yes, Morley has fallen a long way from his glory days in the late nineties. A real shame.

Morley says any suggestion that Scott made up the Oswald photos account in his manuscript is "unsupported". That's true if, among other things, you ignore the statements by Anne Goodpasture and Phillips, both of whom testified that they saw no photos. They would most certainly, it seems to me given their jobs, to have seen any such photos. Goodpasture testified that she was in charge of routing the photos; that is the photos went through her. And if you read the other parts you'll see that Scott is simply making things up, making claims about what he knew about Oswald before the assassination that were only learned later and after it.

Anyway, if Morley wants to be a conspiracy advocate - to pore over this material and plunk out those pieces that support his "the CIA did it view" and ignore any contradictory evidence - then fine; but he's simply not, at this point, a neutral assassination researcher by any measure.

Steve,

I believe you have covered it perfectly. I think the manuscript, rather than an "autobiography" as it is often described, was a vehicle for Scott to spout off without having to be 100 percent adherent to facts although there are undoubtedly elements of truth there. I don't believe there ever were any photos and the CIA bureaucrats simply messed up. Of course, CTs believe the agency is all powerful and infallible so they had to have photos. Yes, Morley has fallen a long way from his glory days in the late nineties. A real shame.

Kacklin' Kamala and "Tommy Boy" Walz are starting to come unglued.  You can fool some of the people some of the time as they say but you can't hide a couple of incompetents for an entire campaign.  They may still win due to the relentless efforts of the media, justice system, and political establishment that would have overwhelmed anyone other than Trump but it's going to be close.  And big mo is on Trump's side coming down the stretch.  The polls are improving.   

   
 From that 6th Floor sniper's nest, it would take a "Drastic" angled shot Downward through the Half Open window to strike the signal arm. This was displayed in "The Lost Bullet" DVD. No question.

My calculation of Oswald's angles based on below is .....
shot-1 at Z113 is -34.8 deg. If at Holland's Z106 it is still -34.6 deg koz either way it is at the signals.
shot-2 at Z218 is -21.0 deg.
shot-3 at Z312 is -16.6 deg.



Here are the timings for Oswald's shot-1 & shot-2 & for a faux shot-3.
87 ft is the horizontal dist scaled by me, 106 ft is the hypotenuse dist allowing for vertical dist estimated by me.

Oswald Shot ----------- hit at ------ fired at  ------ sound hit JFK at – Carcano = 2170 ft per sec.
1 --- 87 ft = 106 ft ----- Z113 ------ Z112.1 ---------- Z113.9 ----- camera runs at 18.3 frames per sec.
2 --- 184 ft = 197 ft---- Z218 ------- Z216.3 --------- Z219.6
3 --- 255 ft = 266 ft ---- Z313 -------- Z310.8 --------- Z315.2 -------- Oswald did not have a shot-3.
The time tween shot-1 & shot-2 is 104.2 frames, which is 5.7 sec. Holland reckoned that shot-1 was at Z106, which is an extra 7 frames, or 0.4 sec, which makes it 6.1 sec.
The time tween shot-2 & faux shot-3 is 94.5 frames, which is 5.2 sec.
Adding to 10.9 sec.

Here are the timings for Hickey's auto burst, based on there being 6 shots.
Hickey Shot ------------- hit at ------ fired at  ------ sound hit JFK at -------
6 ---- 26 ft---------------- Z313 -------- Z312.8 ---------- Z313.2 --- hit JFK in head & cracked windshield.
5 ---- AR15 = 3250 ft per sec------------ Z310.0 ---------- hit chrome trim on windshield.
4 ---- sound = 1100 ft per sec ----------- Z307.25 -------- went over the windshield, hit Elm St.
3 ---- probly 400 rpm= 6.67 rps --------- Z304.5 ---------- went over the windshield, hit Elm St.
2 ------------------------------------------- Z301.8 ----------- went over the windshield, hit Elm St.
1 ------------------------------------------- Z299.0 ---- probly hit Main St pavement & then kerb near Tague.