Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Where Did Prayer Woman Go After The Shooting?
« Last post by Mark A. Oblazney on Today at 09:26:08 PM »
Quote from: Brian Doyle on Today at 04:38:10 PM

Carolyn Arnold popped-in to the 2nd Floor Lunch Room quickly for a drink of water at around 12:25...She was not in there from 12:15 to 12:25...That is ridiculous...

It is obvious to credible Conspiracy researchers that Oswald was in that 2nd Floor Lunch Room eating lunch, like he told Sarah Stanton he intended to do, and was in there from when Carolyn Arnold saw him to when Truly & Baker saw him 6 minutes later...He was obviously assigned there by his Intel handlers to keep him out of the way...

So, uh, which Oswald was in the lunchroom, Al-but?  Was it Harvey?  I thought he was invisible.  Guess I'l have to re-read my Armstrong, huh?  I still say it was a dude off the street looking for a better view.  It is above everyone else, after all.  But that's just me.  What do you think?  No, wait......
2
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Roy Edward Lewis Out On The Grass
« Last post by Michael Welch on Today at 08:21:57 PM »
Quote from: Michael Welch on Today at 08:01:17 PM
Hi Duncan, Wow! Thank you so very much! This is the film that shows the Dallas Police Officer, possibly J. L. Chadwick and Detective Joe D. Hutchison driving Arce, Williams, and Shelley over to the Sheriff's Office! Detectives B. L. Senkel and C. W. Brown wrote up reports that they had driven them over, but they lied! Thank you for everything! I really appreciate it! Sincerely yours, Michael

Check out the footage starting around the 3:45 minute mark!


This is what Detective Brown looked like. He is on the far right. Credit: Denis Morissette


This is what Detective Senkel looked like.  Credit: Linda Zambanini


This is what Detective Joe D. Hutchison looked like. Credit: Denis Morissette


This is what I base my Officer J. L. Chadwick identification on.


With this clearer footage, thanks to Duncan, it could be Officer Paul K. Wilkins. Credit: Jeremy Bacon for his identification in this picture below.
3
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Roy Edward Lewis Out On The Grass
« Last post by Michael Welch on Today at 08:01:17 PM »
Quote from: Duncan MacRae on Today at 06:39:26 PM
Thumb1: The Channel at this link has various edits of the Film https://www.youtube.com/@thejfktheorist1122/search?query=cooper%20film


Hi Duncan, Wow! Thank you so very much! This is the film that shows the Dallas Police Officer, possibly J. L. Chadwick and Detective Joe D. Hutchison driving Arce, Williams, and Shelley over to the Sheriff's Office! Detectives B. L. Senkel and C. W. Brown wrote up reports that they had driven them over, but they lied! Thank you for everything! I really appreciate it! Sincerely yours, Michael

Check out the footage starting around the 3:45 minute mark!


4
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How the Landis bullet possibly ended up on top of the backseat of the limo
« Last post by Alan Ford on Today at 08:01:15 PM »
Quote from: Alan Ford on Today at 04:37:07 PM
Well, unlike you I wasn't there so I can't be sure. But these frames offer the possibility that a bullet may have dropped down into her left hand

...........or she picked it up



Somebody needs to show these frames to Mr. Landis
5
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Last post by Martin Weidmann on Today at 07:54:03 PM »
Quote from: Charles Collins on Today at 07:21:37 PM


Day said a lot of things in his evolving stories. Fritz was still saying on Saturday that they had no prints.

And according to one of the memos or letters from the WC regarding their questions, Wade was saying on Sunday that they had a palm print. There was a lot of misinformation and confusion during that weekend.


That’s not what the report says though. It says, “all of the evidence collected that he was examining, which related to LEE HARVEY OSWALD”. That would certainly include this lift, had it existed at that time.

Those are Drain’s words. And your interpretation of them. The evidence, testimonies, later recollections and elaborations all indicate that Drain’s words are not correct. All of this has already been explained. Go ahead and believe whatever you wish. I couldn’t care less. But you need something to corroborate your interpretation if you want to convince others.



But it also obscures all of the things Day said originally, as well as how they changed over time.

Inconsistencies are common in real life cases. I don’t know what you are referring to specifically.

And according to one of the memos or letters from the WC regarding their questions, Wade was saying on Sunday that they had a palm print.

By then, the rifle had been returned from Washington.

Those are Drain’s words. And your interpretation of them. The evidence, testimonies, later recollections and elaborations all indicate that Drain’s words are not correct.

That's your opinion.

you need something to corroborate your interpretation if you want to convince others.

That works both ways.

Inconsistencies are common in real life cases.

Sure, but so many and in the most important murder case of the decade? Where is the cut off point for making excuses for all the things that happened but shouldn't have?
6
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How the Landis bullet possibly ended up on top of the backseat of the limo
« Last post by Richard Smith on Today at 07:49:39 PM »
Quote from: Royell Storing on Today at 03:57:14 PM
     Disagree. Any NEW Book by a SS Agent that was actively involved/on duty during the JFK Assassination issa must read.
     Personally, I believe there are still many pieces to this puzzle that have intentionally been omitted for whatever reason. Not reasons that are necessarily nefarious in nature. These pieces/issues would include: (1) JFK Limo stopping in route to Parkland, (2) problems incurred during the removal of JFK's body from the Limo after arriving at Parkland, (3) the Lead Car being parked/pointed in a contrary direction to that of the Queen Mary at Parkland. These details are obviously not case crackers, but knowing exactly how things went down sometimes clears up larger issues that are in question.

A few zealots about this case such as those on this forum MIGHT have read it.  The general public has zero interest.  Landis certainly would not have been invited on the mainstream networks to promote his book without the hook about the bullet.  Again, I don't think he is intentionally lying but has gotten old and doesn't have a clue.  That qualifies him for politics but not writing books.  In one interview, he apparently thought the "magic" bullet was the one that struck JFK in the head.  In terms of the other things you mention, those might be of some pedantic historical interest for those heavily invested in the case but they add little or nothing to the resolution of who assassinated JFK.  And I doubt after six decades that Landis' memory is any better on those points than it is on the bullet.
7
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: RIP to the Single-bullet theory?
« Last post by Charles Collins on Today at 07:21:37 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on Today at 05:18:23 PM
Day said a lot of things in his evolving stories. Fritz was still saying on Saturday that they had no prints.

That’s not what the report says though. It says, “all of the evidence collected that he was examining, which related to LEE HARVEY OSWALD”. That would certainly include this lift, had it existed at that time.

But it also obscures all of the things Day said originally, as well as how they changed over time.



Day said a lot of things in his evolving stories. Fritz was still saying on Saturday that they had no prints.

And according to one of the memos or letters from the WC regarding their questions, Wade was saying on Sunday that they had a palm print. There was a lot of misinformation and confusion during that weekend.




That’s not what the report says though. It says, “all of the evidence collected that he was examining, which related to LEE HARVEY OSWALD”. That would certainly include this lift, had it existed at that time.

Those are Drain’s words. And your interpretation of them. The evidence, testimonies, later recollections and elaborations all indicate that Drain’s words are not correct. All of this has already been explained. Go ahead and believe whatever you wish. I couldn’t care less. But you need something to corroborate your interpretation if you want to convince others.



But it also obscures all of the things Day said originally, as well as how they changed over time.

Inconsistencies are common in real life cases. I don’t know what you are referring to specifically.
8
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Roy Edward Lewis Out On The Grass
« Last post by Duncan MacRae on Today at 06:39:26 PM »
Quote from: Michael Welch on Today at 06:26:23 PM
Hi Duncan, You are so much better than some forum moderators who cling to their identification; are uncorrectable in public; then later correct their own private sites!!! I was actually looking for the Roy Cooper film! Would you mind posting it? Thank you for your excellent research my friend! I really appreciate it! With Much Gratitude and Admiration! Sincerely yours, Michael
Thumb1: The Channel at this link has various edits of the Film https://www.youtube.com/@thejfktheorist1122/search?query=cooper%20film

9
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Roy Edward Lewis Out On The Grass
« Last post by Michael Welch on Today at 06:26:23 PM »
Quote from: Duncan MacRae on Today at 05:01:45 PM
I just watched the Roy Cooper Film, Michael, you are 100% correct.



Hi Duncan, You are so much better than some forum moderators who cling to their identification; are uncorrectable in public; then later correct their own private sites!!! I was actually looking for the Roy Cooper film! Would you mind posting it? Thank you for your excellent research my friend! I really appreciate it! With Much Gratitude and Admiration! Sincerely yours, Michael

10
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: How the Landis bullet possibly ended up on top of the backseat of the limo
« Last post by Jarrett Smith on Today at 05:48:36 PM »
Quote from: Richard Smith on Today at 03:17:12 PM
You think Jackie caught the bullet in her hand and placed it there?  That is far out.  Landis didn't mention the bullet six decades ago.  I don't think he is intentionally lying but like many elderly people, he has mixed things up.  Just look at our president.  Likely manipulated by others to sell a book.  No one would have given his book a second thought except for the new claim about the bullet.

Your being more generous than me Richard the old fool is lying through his teeth. Motive most likely is to set up his kids/grandkids for the future. Clint "if I was one second faster" Hill is a liar too. Can't believe anything they say. Drinking the night before, failing to protect the President, cleaning evidence from the car at Parkland, stealing the body, on and on.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Mobile View