Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
Oswald's first shot at pseudo Z105-110 ricocheted offa the overhead signal arm & the jacket split off into 2 pieces (found in the limo), & the main lead slug (never found) made a hole in the floor of the limo, & some of the lead splatter lodged in/on the top-back of jfk's head (xrays).
I doubt that any FMJ bullet ever left any lead (from the butt of the slug) on the outside of a human head/skull when passing throo the skull (when not tumbling)(ie at shortish range) .
No FMJ bullet ever fragmented when passing throo a human skull (fresh skull or old/ dry skull) when entering & passing throo high up on the skull (when not tumbling)(ie at shortish range).
12
  What do you mean by "enhancement"? What EXACTLY did you do to that image? Did you add that antenna to the image?

I assumed that would be obvious to most...
Also, the faint outline of his hat and back of coat and sleeve...
13
Morley is not saying: "We need a fuller historical understanding of events surrounding the assassination. About what the CIA was doing. Or possibly doing. There are hints that perhaps something worse happened. Acts of omission or acts of commission. Let's find out and hold people accountable."

That's fine. No one objects to that. Or should. But he is saying more than that and it's that more that's the problem.

He says this: "The CIA killed JFK and framed Oswald. And covered it up.  Angleton and Joannides and others committed treason. These documents will show it. That's why they are being held."

And when they are released and don't show what he claims, we should just shrug our shoulders and say "Well, he means well"?

He's not asking questions; he making very serious claims. And when those claims are shown to have no basis what should we do? Just give him a pass?
14

  What do you mean by "enhancement"? What EXACTLY did you do to that image? Did you add that antenna to the image?
15
Every time Morley's falsehoods and smears are exposed as being just that you use the "Don't you want to hold the government accountable?" dodge. Whenever Morley has said release this or release that we say, "Yes, release them. The AARB files, Joannides personnel files. Whatever. Release them all."

For the nth time, release Harvey's files. Joannides files. No one here is saying otherwise. There. Satisfied?

Now do you want to address the points that Fred and others have made about his allegations? Or do you not care? What's amazing is that you ignore what Morley says, what he claims people did, what document "X" or "Y" will show. He accuses people of murder, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, framing innocent men, and essentially treason.

And when his claims are found to have no basis, when the evidence he claims shows this are produced and they don't show it, you don't care.

We get it Jon: You leftwing conspiracists want to get the CIA. Fine, in some cases you are correct about it. But stop using the assassination as an instrument to do so.

Far-Right Trump supporters are just as bad.

As I said somewhere earlier, one of Morley's main writers at JFK Facts (sic) is Chester "Chad" Nagle, Jr., a MAGAT if there ever was one.
16
  Even the WW 2 Walkie Talkies had much heavier gauge antenna's than we possibly see on this image. A skinny antenna such as we see here would break off in nothing flat.

That is only an enhancement... as is the outline of his hat... to help orient the view...

17

  Even the WW 2 Walkie Talkies had much heavier gauge antenna's than we possibly see on this image. A skinny antenna such as we see here would break off in nothing flat.
18
Amazing.

Honest question, should the CIA be held accountable (or not) for lying to investigators and obstructing investigations into JFK's murder?

Morley exposing the fact that the CIA lied on several occasions about facts related to the Kennedy assassination should be a huge scandal. But according to you, Morley is a bad guy for asking questions and attempting to clear up the historical records which are confusing due to intentional obstruction.

And I don't know where you get the idea that it's only the far-Left that wants accountability from our government. Lots of people who voted for Trump supported his promise to open the Esptein/JFK/MLK/RFK files.
Every time Morley's falsehoods and smears are exposed as being just that you use the "Don't you want to hold the government accountable?" dodge. Whenever Morley has said release this or release that we say, "Yes, release them. The AARB files, Joannides personnel files. Whatever. Release them all."

For the nth time, release Harvey's files. Joannides files. No one here is saying otherwise. There. Satisfied? Hold the people accountable if it's *proven" they did wrong. An allegation is not proof. Again, that answers your question. But you won't answer ours.

Now do you want to address the points that Fred and others have made about his allegations? Or do you not care? What's amazing is that you ignore what Morley says, what he claims people did, what document "X" or "Y" will show. He accuses people of murder, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, framing innocent men, and essentially treason.

And when his claims are found to have no basis, when the evidence he claims that will show this are produced and they don't show it, you don't care.

We get it Jon: You political Left conspiracists want to get the CIA (and now the MAGA Right too). Fine, in some cases you are correct about it. But stop using the assassination as an instrument to do so.
19
Howdy, Mr. Phillips

Welcome to the forum. That particular shot came from the front of the presidential limousine. No bullet being fired from behind the presidential limousine could veer off to the right-side in mid-flight, catch up to its intended target and then subsequently veer back to the left to impact the decisive wound upon President Kennedy.
Interestingly enough, even one of the motorcade motorcycle-officers--a Mr. Hargis (Bobby) I believe, riding to the rear left of the presidential limousine was actually hit by blood splatter & brain matter from that obvious shot from the front of the presidential limousine.

Please be wary of anyone trying to convince you that that particular shot came from behind the presidential limousine. It did not.

It's amazing what a bunch of lying treasonous cowards will do and say after ambushing an unarmed duly elected representative of the People. The wrongly-accused--Mr. Oswald--did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

Ford,

You're full of high-fructose beans and KGB* disinformation whether you realize it or not.

*Today's SVR and FSB
20
   You guys need to FOCUS on the 2nd film snippet down from the top. About halfway down that short wall, just down from the Pyracantha Bush, there is a WHITE OBJECT stretching over the short wall. There is Not supposed to be anything in this area behind the short wall. This WHITE OBJECT is shaped like a large zoom camera, or a telescope. It has a Black Circle around the end of it. Just like you see on a Zoom Camera. This WHITE OBJECT has always been extremely blurry on other assassination films, making it difficult to figure out what it might be. This snippet is the clearest I have seen this WHITE OBJECT to date. Whatever it is, it is pointed toward Elm St. It is either resting on that short wall or maybe attached to a tripod. It is barely taller than the short wall. What is that WHITE OBJECT?


It could very well be a spotter's scope...

However, the game-changing image that should not be overlooked, is Zapruder on a walkie talkie.
THAT is the one image that strongly suggests a coordinated ambush on the president... and then a deliberate cover-up...

Sooooo... all the crap about Zapruder having to be pressured to go back and get his camera... and then his expressing remorse over the assassination and crying CROCODILE TEARS... well... it's all crap... a pre-arranged story and drama for the public, to have us believe nothing was pre-arranged...


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10