JFK Assassination Forum

Naturally, and as to be expected, the unbiased here are jumping around all over the place. When I talk about two dots on the Kennedy stand-in and expect someone from the unbiased to explain that point, they talk about the Connally guy being too low in the seat.

No explanation whatsoever of how a bullet heading from roughly 90 yards away and at a downward angle, hits the guy's back - and YES it's the back - and then somehow moves upward and exit the throat where the other marker is.

No explanation at all. And get this - the xxxxing back shot didn't even exit!  Hahahaha! That's a fact. Period.

Sure, sure.  Hahahaha!

Remember the saying now
>>> Sez Lord Haughty the Condescender III

Your avatar displays Hugo Weaving yet your posts scream Tony Robinson.

The grammar/spelling police check in to show their resolve.

It's the only mistake Iacoletti has ever made, and I couldn't resist "publicizing" it.

--  MWT   


PS  10-to-1 he'll say I "made it up".

Steely Dan wrote:

What Steely Dan is saying here is he doesn't offer anything to deny what I wrote and typically avoids its truthful substance...He's saying he has a right to ignore the truthful content of what you wrote and answer it with trolling in Kamp's troll sanctuary...

The result of which is the host of this flagrant destruction of normal research standards is then given fast lane access to the other forum and I am then punished for what they are guilty of...

The original subject of Zartman endorsing me 100% and getting no flack from Kamp's goons is successfully detoured around with obnoxious trolling and avoidance of the point...

This is the letter of the law definition of criminal harassment and cyber bullying...

So, because people disagree with your assumption that Sarah Stanton is not "Prayer Woman", you believe that is criminal harassment and cyber bullying? I just have to laugh at what you're trying to claim. Seems to me, that you managed to derail this thread with your personal beef with people on other sites not taking you seriously enough to believe your claims. You've offered no proof to officially declare who the figure in the photo is, and it's not Sarah Stanton.  I'm sorry, that is not cyber bullying, that's just people not believing in your claims in which they have every right to do. All I see from you, is you attacking other people on other sites in this thread for not taking you seriously which makes you angry. How about you provide some actual proof and we keep this thread on track for what it's intended for? 

You are right about everything but Trump. Trump plays games with people who seem so sensitive to his meaningless claims. On the other, we have the actors who play dumb as a fox with their own gossip. Plant seeds every day hoping the public bites, which it will, but how long can a fake story stay alive? Take your pick, he is a racist or he is involved in collusion. Two claims by those who are professionally offended 24/7 and never back it up. It started with fake polling, where the media told you "he will not win" again and again. How did that work out? Well, if you dislike the man, you ignored the games the media played. What is really peculiar is the media becomes "fact-check happy", imagine that! So when we talk about claims you mean like LBJ's Gulf of Tonkin or how about the USS Liberty explanation as being mistaken for an Egyptian vessel that hauls horses Then you have Obama claiming if you like your Health care you can keep the doctor. Or Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynche  claiming their tarmac conversation was about the grandchildren

It's really pathetic how people on the right always give Trump a free pass claiming all his lies and crimes are "meaningless" while deflecting and trying to hold others accountable to a higher standard. That's hypocritical and why he is coddled by his ignorant sycophants. You're just spouting off all your right wing talking points that every talking head on Faux propaganda parrots.

So, in your world the media should not be obligated to "fact check" a candidate or a President to make sure what they are saying is accurate. They are allowed to make up any falsehood and pretend that information is indeed correct. Well, that's why there is Faux Propaganda to recite Trump's falsehoods while issuing Kremlin talking points. The job of the media is to report the truth and to make sure what elected officials are saying is indeed correct. Too bad you want to live in a state run media society. Most Americans don't.       

The polling was indeed accurate since Clinton won the popular vote. Trump won 3 swing states by 1% and only 70,000 votes that the Senate Intelligence Committee confirmed that Russia penetrated the Democratic voter registration. He is a blatant racist who is supported by white supremacists and neo nazis. David Duke says "Trump speaks our language." Is that not enough evidence for you? His people all had involvement with Russians and had over 100 meetings with Russian officials. But the right feels that isn't collusion even when the GOP changed their entire platform to pro Russia at the demand of Paul Manafort. Trump even had Russian Government officials in the Oval Office laughing with them because he fired Comey. Stood on stage and supported Putin over our own intelligence. That's pure treason. Those are the facts and people like you look the other way accusing the media and Democrats instead. That's really pathetic.