Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
General Discussion & Debate / Prayer Woman
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Today at 01:59:08 AM »

Translation:  " I can't answer the clearly articulated science that proves me wrong "...

Thank you Barry...

The information you clearly dodged proved that Lovelady was on the landing in Wiegman and Altgens and was not on his toes so therefore Prayer Man was provably on the landing - and was therefore provably too short to be Oswald...You obviously couldn't refute a single scientific point I made about the plainly observable measurements that proved it...

You obviously aren't posting seriously and your points shouldn't be taken seriously...If you argue well you can get unserious posters to expose themselves like I have done with Barry...

Professional examination of the original Wiegman film will show Davidson's face to be a real and existing feature of the original Wiegman celluloid...
12
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Motive
« Last post by Michael O'Brian on Today at 01:57:33 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Again: You truncated a sentence in my post that made me look as if I supported your circus trick-shot theory. I saw that falsehood immediately. Denis saw that falsehood immediately. Duncan has specifically addressed that practice in his latest forum rules.

Forum veteran Royell Storing, despite being firmly entrenched in the CT encampment, set aside differences and stood up to defend the integrity of forum by way of supporting Denis and myself in this matter.

If you get 'wound up' by my posts, then you are far too emotionally embedded in the assassination in general.

You supported my theory at first and then back tracked, and don't worry about me I am not emotionally embedded about this at all, I am just educating you to what happened and by whom, you just can't accept that it was Protestants who killed J.F.K and set poor L.H.O up, it is so obvious to me, I am sure one day you will come around and admit it.
13
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Motive
« Last post by Michael O'Brian on Today at 01:53:51 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Poor Mick. Peering at the world through rose-colored glasses.



American Patriots were largely anti-Catholic until it became necessary to ally with France.

That looks like ale in a glass made to hold stout :-) but what has alcohol got to do with my post??
Those in the South during the 60's were still largely anti- Catholic, and they were still trapped in a time warp of civil war politics, just look at the civil unrest in those areas during this period, it was almost a war zone.
You had mainly Protestants not wanting to reform, to accept equal right with African Americans.
14
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's obvious that Sroring and Pollard don't give a flying xxxx about forum protocol.

-- MWT   ;)

You've just it broken it yourself by calling Mr. Storing a name.
 ;D
15
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Prayer Woman
« Last post by Barry Pollard on Today at 01:50:29 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Barry - You didn't respond to my post #4580...


Did you respond to me when I asked you how it's possible for you to mistake a cartoon for a real image of PM, I mean LHO?
Ten chances I gave you and nothing but silence.

Here's another, are you getting professional help with all this anti-social stuff?  This hypocrisy is off the freakin' chart and quite troubling actually.
16
Fair enough
17
General Discussion & Debate / Prayer Woman
« Last post by Brian Doyle on Today at 01:39:56 AM »
BK responded:

Quote
Dingo Doyle’s reply is another fine example of being in denial.
You have literally bored everyone in the research community with your dreck.
Bye for now oh boring one......


The person who wrote the above is not credible and obviously fears posting my reply above on his site because it obviously refutes his choice for Stanton...He's literally afraid to post it on his troll board because he knows it disproves him and he can't answer a single point I made...

The JFK research community has destroyed its credibility by means of this subject and their letting BK get away with what nobody else would ever be allowed to get away with were the tables turned...

I guess I can consider BK's cowardly dodge of all the evidence a win for myself and can consider this matter solved...BK has, of course, full priority access privilege to that other board...

If anyone is reading this please observe the responses to the evidence I posted on BK's site...It is pure demented trolling...Then realize I got banned from DPF when I protested that Jim DiEugenio was allowed to point people to that site saying "I really think people should go over there and look at what they are offering"...
18
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
A point of order:

Unless the side conversation about those who left the media cars can be connected to the on-topic subject of The Three Women, I move that it be moved to another thread...

It's obvious that Sroring and Pollard don't give a flying xxxx about forum protocol.

-- MWT   ;)
19

A point of order:

Unless the side conversation about those who left the media cars can be respectfully connected to the on-topic subject of the 3 Women I move that it be moved to another thread...
20
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Only in Trask's head(and in yours, mine and hundreds of others who've read the same thing).  But in the real evidence Johns just isn't there, not in Atkins, in Wiegman or Dillard.

Consider this, if a half decent agent commandeered CC1 on that street and at that time, you think the driver would have been allowed to wait for Atkins and his precious brand new camera?  Nup, IMO they would have been gone and I guess in yours too, since you believe Johns reacted to the sound of gunfire.
.
And Atkins did not dive head first back into the car, he had to wait for it to fully stop, that's the one and only reason why CC1 is still on Elm after a full minute, and probably twenty seconds after the last Dillard snap.  Atkins had a very expensive brand new camera(imagine an iphone the size of a briefcase, brand new and 100 times more fragile) and was not going to chance breaking it for anyone, especially on an unscheduled stop where he didn't even realise what had actually happened or even why they stopped.  As seen in Couch and as he hints toward to Trask, Atkins hit the GK completely clueless and after being directly at the intersection during "the third shot"™.

  You and I differ as to the Reason SA Johns Lied about jumping out of the LBJ SS Car and then running down Elm St. With Wiegman having seen Johns UP at the Top of the Knoll, Johns and the SS knew they had to cook up a story to at least place Johns Outside of the SS Car after the Kill Shot. The SS probably figured they could quibble as to their claim of Johns staying physically on Elm St vs Wiegman's story of running into John's UP at the Top of the Knoll IF these 2 conflicting accounts was Ever raised. Just my opinion, but I believe that SA Johns was Never seated inside the LBJ SS Follow-Up Car. I believe he was assigned a physical position somewhere inside Dealey Plaza that day. The reason the SS did Not want to admit that Johns was positioned inside Dealey Plaza that day is the Real Mystery. The sighting of a SS Agent on foot inside Dealey Plaza immediately after the Kill Shot by both Law Enforcement and general eyewitnesses has always been categorically denied by the SS. Wiegman having encountered SA Johns at the Top of the Knoll corroborates those reported sightings of an SS Agent on foot inside Dealey Plaza.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
Mobile View