JFK Assassination Forum

This is your go-to when you cannot respond to the points raised.

Basically what you are doing is whining that we are not arguing within the context of your narrowly defined assumptions, therefore you are going to take your ball and go home.

But not without flouncing with an insult for good measure.  Which is part of the standard LN script.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist.  Why should I be compelled to come up with one?  Just so you can shift the burden away from your own failing narrative?

Like your propaganda is some gift that should be sought out and cherished?

I'm not a conspiracy theorist.

Hahahaha! Who do you think you're kidding?

You're just copying Weidmann. Of course you're a conspiracy theorist, you continually theorize in over eleven thousand posts that it wasn't Oswald and keep elaborating on this theory by rejecting each piece of the Mountain of evidence that incriminates Oswald and in doing so, you constantly say/imply that the evidence is manipulated, the very definition of a conspiracy.
Just because you're not smart enough to figure out where all your denials lead doesn't stop you from being a grade "A" conspiracy theorist! LOL!

JohnM

You need much more than squinting at a blurry film and interpreting reactions in a self-serving way.

Oh wait, I forgot who I was talking to.

Iacoletti,

Do you still think the three people walking across the pergola's "patio" a few minutes after the assassination in the Mr. Towner clip were three Bermuda-shorts-wearing dudes, and that one of them was either wearing a blue headscarf or holding a blue balloon near his head?

The evidence that CE-399 wounded both JFK and JBC is comprised of the following: the fact that a bullet like CE-399 has a tendency to start tumbling upon exiting something soft (like a block of ballistics gel or a human neck), the fact that the entry wound in JBC's back measured 15mm x 6mm, the fact that both CE-399 and the largish bullet fragments found in the limo were ballistically traced to Oswald's short-rifle, the fact that the injuries sustained by JBC's wrist were commiserate with CE-399's penetrating it backwards and sideswiping his radial bone, the fact that the damage sustained by CE-399 was commiserate with the damage it did to JBC's rib and wrist, and the fact that JFK's and JBC's reactions (including JBC's hat flip, his jacket's billowing outwards, and his lapel's flapping outwards) in the Zapruder film were sufficiently close in time to lead The Reasonable Man (it's a legal  theory) to conclude that they had been wounded by the same bullet. All of these things taken collectively prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that JFK and JBC were both wounded by CE-399.

Well said!

Geez, what are the chances that someone could produce a bullet that would match the injuries with such precision, missing a small amount of lead and flattened on only one side?



JohnM

That's quite weird, John.
Any chance of dealing with the issue I raise in my post.

This is “Mytton”. There is no chance.

All of which is a fancy way of saying “it’s not absolutely impossible that CE399 caused all those wounds, therefore it did”.

That’s rhetoric, not evidence.

No, Iacoletti, that's just your "Oswald Public Defender" way of twisting it.