Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
71
General Discussion & Debate / Re: In Search of the Childhood Lee
« Last post by Jerry Freeman on April 05, 2020, 06:17:42 PM »
Incredibly racist.
Also incredibly stupid and off topic.
72
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Dallas Police Station Press Conference
« Last post by Walt Cakebread on April 05, 2020, 06:00:51 PM »
The FBI had been tracking Oswald for years.  The FBI agent in Dallas knew plenty about him from the very first second his name was mentioned.  He had just visited his wife. No great mystery.  They didn't even need a "telephone to communicate long distance" LOL.  The agent was there.

The FBI had been tracking Oswald for years.

Probably true ..... The FBI kept tabs on their informers, many of whom were criminals, or ex-cons. ( who would be better to use to keep an eye on the underworld" )

Lee Oswald had called attention to himself when he took the mission to infiltrate the USSR and pretended to be a "turn coat marine".   Hoover hated the communists or anybody proclaiming to be a fellow traveler.....thus Hoover hated Lee Oswald.

 
73
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Bob Dylan - Murder Most Foul
« Last post by Richard Smith on April 05, 2020, 05:33:53 PM »
Dylan comes in on the right side and voices the true conspiracy evidence and its poetic references...Bob is no dummy or faker...

He faked being a hippie folk singer.  He later admitted he couldn't stand those folks.  He is at least candid about that fifty years after he cashed out on those knuckleheads.  This song is such a rambling piece of nonsense it is impossible to determine whether he is a conspiracy kook. 


What is the truth, and where did it go?
Ask Oswald and Ruby, they oughta know
74
General Discussion & Debate / Re: In Search of the Childhood Lee
« Last post by Walt Cakebread on April 05, 2020, 05:31:53 PM »
Source of record...Warren Report
I couldn't immediately find an entry for '51-'52 anywhere.
 
In contrast to the description of a youngster mentioned in the opening post....https://www.school-for-champions.com/biographies/lee_harvey_oswald.htm#.Xoll3XJOmUl
If someone would bother to review the testimony of John Pic....they would not find any such statement except that Mrs Pic told her husband about some knife incident. As usual, any vilification of Oswald stood paramount.   

As usual, any vilification of Oswald stood paramount.   

That's right.....And who do you think twisted this minor disagreement into a major incident?   

Marguerite said the incident was not a threat with a knife at all..... Lee had received a new pocket knife and he had it his hand admiring it as a boy will do, when her daughter in law started hassling Lee about some program that Lee was watching on TV, and in responding to Pic's wife he waved the knife around .....
75
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Dallas Police Station Press Conference
« Last post by Richard Smith on April 05, 2020, 05:15:11 PM »
The speed by which they had information about Oswald available for the media has always bothered me. This was 1963 when they had nothing more than a telephone to communicate long distance, yet IMO even now you couldn't find out all those details about a so-called loser as quickly as that. It was like they already had a press kit at their disposal as soon as they arrested him.

The FBI had been tracking Oswald for years.  The FBI agent in Dallas knew plenty about him from the very first second his name was mentioned.  He had just visited his wife. No great mystery.  They didn't even need a "telephone to communicate long distance" LOL.  The agent was there.
76
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Dallas Police Station Press Conference
« Last post by Walt Cakebread on April 05, 2020, 04:55:29 PM »
The speed by which they had information about Oswald available for the media has always bothered me. This was 1963 when they had nothing more than a telephone to communicate long distance, yet IMO even now you couldn't find out all those details about a so-called loser as quickly as that. It was like they already had a press kit at their disposal as soon as they arrested him.

Excellent point, Martin...... 

My hearing is impaired so I have to strain to hear what is being said on those tapes....BUT.... Didn't a reporter alude to this very subject during the Q &A ....

I thought I heard a reporter say something like... "How have you solved this case so rapidly?   
77
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Did Oswald Go To Mexico City?
« Last post by Walt Cakebread on April 05, 2020, 04:47:30 PM »
“Oswald stated that he did not own any rifle. He advised that he saw a rifle day before yesterday at the Texas School Book Depository which Mr. Truly and two other gentlemen had in their possession and were looking at.“

He advised that he saw a rifle day before yesterday at the Texas School Book Depository which Mr. Truly and two other gentlemen had in their possession and were looking at.“  

N, that's not correct .......  We know for a FACT that Warren Caster testified that he had more than one rifle outside Mr Truly's office on the 1st floor of the TSBD.

And the very first entry in FBI agent James Hosty's scribbled notes which he took during the interrogation of Lee Oswald says :....
Day before yesterday Mr Truly had ( this) rifle and two other ( rifles)  outside of his office on he first floor of the building.
78
General Discussion & Debate / Re: In Search of the Childhood Lee
« Last post by John Iacoletti on April 05, 2020, 04:43:35 PM »
Colonavilus !!!!  Colonavilus!!   There no such ting, you are misconstrued, need bowl of noodles....... no, wait..... that ain't racist, is it, Tom?  Trump needs to suey Pelosi for defamation of calacter.....

Incredibly racist.
79
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Don't get bit.....
« Last post by John Iacoletti on April 05, 2020, 04:40:25 PM »
Response (B) is also a Walt Fabrication.
80
General Discussion & Debate / Proof Sarah Stanton Is Prayer Man
« Last post by Brian Doyle on April 05, 2020, 04:35:30 PM »
Stancak is ignoring what we already discussed and is re-posting his same pseudo-analysis BS with the help of clueless Gordon who seems to think his job is to keep the door open for endless time-wasting BS instead of moderating according to good evidence...

Stancak has posted a computer graphic on the Education Forum showing Pauline Sanders' face in between Lovelady and Shelley in Altgens and claiming it is Stanton...

We've been through this before and all Stancak's so called "work" is is wishful thinking cartoons where he forges what he wants to be in order to make Oswald Prayer Man and tries to pass it off as advanced computer graphic analysis...

Stancak has no skill what so ever at photo analysis and fails to realize that Pauline Sanders' face that appears between Lovelady and Shelley is actually behind Shelley and in the spot where Sanders is seen in Stancak's other images of Sanders...

Stancak is well aware that what he is posting is garbage because he includes the disclaimer "I know some others might disagree" etc...

In his misleading false graphics Stancak fails to tell the reader that at the exact time he is allegedly showing Stanton to Frazier's left in Altgens Lovelady is on record describing Stanton as being in the Prayer Man spot...In his combined Commission testimony and HSCA tape Lovelady described Shelley to his left (as we see in Altgens), and Frazier to his rear, which leaves the Prayer Man spot to his right the only place to place Stanton, whom he also describes...

In his 1964 FBI statement Lovelady clearly indicated that Stanton was over to the far right of the entranceway with him...Hughes shows Lovelady leaning against the west wall at the time Lovelady indicated (when the limousine passed)...So 9 seconds before Altgens Lovelady confirmed Stanton was in the Prayer Man spot...

9 seconds after Stanton was confirmed to be all the way to the right of the portal Davidson discovered the undeniable face of a woman on Prayer Man in Wiegman...

The JFK research community fails to inform Stancak that the compression factor on Altgen's lens was high and made objects appear closer to each other on the depth scale than they were...

The little eyes and forehead seen in between Lovelady and Shelley in Altgens are not in between Lovelady and Shelley as Stancak incompetently portrays...That little face is back behind Shelley in the exact spot that Stancak's other Darnell image places Pauline Sanders...So in effect Stancak is pointing-out Pauline Sanders as being Stanton and is ignoring all the other evidence that refutes it...

For anyone with common sense, as is usual, when the Prayer Man believers claims are competently analyzed they actually prove Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...

The wit and wisdom of one James Gordon sees fit to ban and censor those who possess the correct evidence and go out of his way to make sure this laughable garbage is protected and given a safe place to deceive...

We also have damning new evidence of Dougherty witnessing Oswald eating in the 2nd floor lunch room that is going undiscussed on that Prayer Man-pirated board that Gordon and the members are not ashamed of the delinquent lack of honest discussion over...

Still waiting for Stancak to do a computer graphic of Wiegman which will automatically show that Prayer Man could not have had his foot on the step (which is why Stancak avoided it)...

 



Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
Mobile View