Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
.....
Thanks for baiting him and exposing the outrageous double standards. Hilarious!

JohnM

Double standards, or no actual standards? Virginia Davis misrepresented her age to DPD and in her Warren Commission sworn testimony but her credibility is NOT to be questioned, despite unique details she "recounted".

William Whaley created the legend of the LN fleeing the scene of the crime with curious lack of urgency, (ice water in Oswald's veins, cold blooded, reptilian killer, scrambled egg for a brain, per "reporter" Breslin, echoed by Nellie Connally) offering Whaley's
cab to a woman who seemed to Whaley to communicate a greater air of urgency than the LN assassin. Remarkably consistent records into the mid 1940s, including the date of his parents' 1907 marriage, Whaley's 1908 birth year, 1910, '20, '30, and '40 US census records, Whaley's son's birth certificate, and Whaley's 1942 military draft record all indicate he was born in 1908.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


News reporters, including the highly regarded (by LNs...) Hugh Aynesworth, reported that Whaley served as a "Navy gunner" in the 1945 invasion of Iwo Jima, earning a Navy Cross for his combat related actions. No proof of this high award for his combat service has ever emerged and LNs are remarkably incurious. Whaley's son (and namesake) born in 1931, went to live with Whaley's wife's sister after her 1934, TB related death. Whaley Jr. considered his aunt and her husband to be his parents.

The lack of interest in any of these issues which would predictably influence any reasonable person (the sort sought via voir dire jury pool questioning by both defense and prosecuting attorneys) to discount the general credibility of both Ms. Davis and Mr. Whaley, since their deceptions were ongoing as they testified, are judged less troubling, or of no concern whatsoever, compared to the disqualification of 1865 Lincoln Assassination witness, Maj. Rathbone, because he murdered his wife 18 years after his Lincoln testimony?

If Booth lived long enough to be tried...."Maj. Rathbone, have you ever contemplated murdering your fiance?"
VS
"Ms. Davis, (or Mr. Whaley), why do defense investigators inform our Oswald defense team of d.o.b. dates of your background records different from the age you have represnted yourself to be to inquiring officials or to the press?"

Isn't the core deficiency, (for the inquiring, open minded) the deprivation of a criminal trial, owing to lax DPD security, indifference by Sheriff Bill Decker and
Ruby's murderous act, resulted in no defense attorney raising some of the issues (and similarly, about other prosecution witnesses) to a trial jury, which I present in this post?

UPDATE:

.....

most extraordinary, tom.  thanks for your time+
42
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Prayer Woman
« Last post by John Iacoletti on August 22, 2019, 06:02:32 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Denny Zartman wrote:

Nothing about Doyle or endorsing Doyle.
43
General Discussion & Debate / Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Last post by John Iacoletti on August 22, 2019, 05:59:14 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
So you don't think I'm an LN then...

How did you come to that conclusion?  The post that you screenshotted makes no mention of LNs.

Quote
after all, you sent your rant directly to me.

You have a strange notion of what constitutes "sent directly".

P.S. what rant?
44
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Your species seems overjoyed with Whaley's observation and have practically declared the little snot innocent.

Evidence of this "overjoyment"?  Or this "practical declaration"?
45
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No, and I don't think that CE399 was fired a couple of seconds later at about Zapruder frame 202 either, so what's your point?

How do you know if or how the jacket was bunched when JFK was struck in the back?
46
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Book
« Last post by Charles Collins on August 22, 2019, 05:31:41 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The goal is to use as much as possible known facts and fill up the gaps with fiction. But not fiction like aliens, demons, vampires but plausible fiction.
Also, the goal is not to offer documented, solid evidence since I do not have access to them but to open a new direction of research which would lead to new evidence.

Here is one paragraph from Reclaiming History, page 976, that you might find interesting:

In his book The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays, Richard Hofstadter writes that "the typical procedure of the higher paranoid scholarship is to start with defensible assumptions." He goes on to say, in an observation tailor-made for the conspiracy theorists in the Kennedy case, that "the paranoid mentality is far more coherent than the real world, since it leaves no room for mistakes, failures or ambiguities... It believes it is up against an enemy who is as infallibly rational as he is totally evil, and it seeks to match his imputed total competence with its own, leaving nothing unexplained and comprehending all of reality in one overreaching , consistent theory." Hofstadter says the "qualities" of the paranoid style are "heated exaggeration, suspiciousness, and conspiratorial fantasy," and a "heroic striving for 'evidence' to prove that the unbelievable is the only thing that can be believed."
47
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've never had that experience
Tell us what it feels like

In clueless Martin's case, maybe you should direct that question to Roger Collins.
48
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Don't you ever get tired of being you?
Has chronic trolliosis [incurable]
49
General Discussion & Debate / Re: Prayer Woman
« Last post by Mark A. Oblazney on August 22, 2019, 11:43:30 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
So, because people disagree with your assumption that Sarah Stanton is not "Prayer Woman", you believe that is criminal harassment and cyber bullying? I just have to laugh at what you're trying to claim. Seems to me, that you managed to derail this thread with your personal beef with people on other sites not taking you seriously enough to believe your claims. You've offered no proof to officially declare who the figure in the photo is, and it's not Sarah Stanton.  I'm sorry, that is not cyber bullying, that's just people not believing in your claims in which they have every right to do. All I see from you, is you attacking other people on other sites in this thread for not taking you seriously which makes you angry. How about you provide some actual proof and we keep this thread on track for what it's intended for?

Why don't you do what the man asks, Albert?  Provide us some proof.  Real proof.  Not poof.
50
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've never had that experience
Tell us what it feels like

How in the world could I ever know what it is like being tired of being you?
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
Mobile View