Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
So censorship is the answer. You think the discussion has gone off the rails, and so the only answer is to delete it?

fred
62
   "Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck". This written change was made knowing that the JFK Autopsy Photos were sealed. And the guy making this change then eventually gets appointed VP and politically ascends to POTUS? With respect to your claim of "stupidity" being responsible for everything, there does come a straw that breaks the camel's back.

Conspiracy hobbyists have been waiting for that straw for 62 years and are still grasping.

I have no idea why Gerald Ford wanted that change. It made no sense. The geometry of the wounds caused by the single bullet worked perfectly fine with an entry wound on the upper back. IOW, it was an act of stupidity.
63
Dear Dr. William Niederhut,

You're full of high-fructose beans.

-- Tom

Tom,

       Beans are not a significant source of fructose.   Did you hear that one from Grok?
64
but did AI not give you a link to the ADL stuff on Niederhut?

fred

Fred,
 
       The thread in question had gone off the rails, with false, defamatory accusations about Anti-Semitism and Holocaust Denial.

       And I see that Ben Cole is still repeating this libelous nonsense here.
 
       Calling someone, like Prouty, an "Anti-Semitic crackpot" is an effective way to smear them, eh?

       Do Ben Cole, Michael Griffith, James Wilkinson, et.al., also consider Bernie Sanders to be an "Anti-Semitic crackpot," for criticizing Netanyahu?

       I have been a Bernie Sanders supporter for the past decade.
65

  I am not making anything up. Witt testified that he was sitting on the knoll. He was surprised when he saw the JFK Limo coming down Elm St. He got up, and then walked directly toward Elm St while simultaneously struggling to open his umbrella. This is in contrast to the Bronson Film showing Umbrella Man standing dead still near the Stemmons sign as the JFK Limo travels down Elm St. The kicker here is that the Bronson Film was not public knowledge at the time of Witt's HSCA testimony. This is why Witt was able to spin his yarn with the added Kabuki Theater/Collapsing Umbrella, and not be challenged. If Witt's story is true, then the Bronson Film is Bogus. If the Bronson Film is legit, then Witt is a fraud. This is clear. 
66
Why did you delete the thread rather than move it?

fred
67
   Witt's HSCA testimony does not come close to matching the 11/22/63 Umbrella Man image evidence. 15 yrs later, anyone would remember their walking down the Knoll directly toward Elm St vs standing still, pumping an umbrella, and facing the oncoming JFK Limo.

Just because you think "anyone would remember" how they walked down a street 15 years earlier doesn't make it true. Once again you're just making things up.
68
Hi, Fred.

John Simkin has asked us to not discuss 9/11 on the JFKA board.

Wilkinson raised the subject in the context of the false accusations that I am an Anti-Semite.

I did go to the trouble today of starting a new thread on our 9/11 board for people-- including Wilkinson, Ben Cole, and Michael Griffith-- who still don't understand the 9/11 science data.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/32001-911-science-101-for-beginners/

I should point out that these Anti-Truthers (above) have not studied physics or chemistry at a collegiate or post-graduate level. 

In Griffith's case, disinformation is a job.

As for Grok-- it's merely regurgitating the ubiquitous government disinformation on the internet.

It's a GIGO model.  Garbage-In-Garbage-Out.

Cheers.

Oh I get it.. everybody is wrong besides you, the master intellectual Dr. Niederhut.. yet you come over here and imply that people on another forum post "disinformation" as part of a "job." Nobody believes your 9/11 controlled demolition spiel anyway. Buzz off.
69
Dear Sonderführer Storing,

How many years after that tragic day in Dallas did Witt testify?

Fifteen?

-- Tom

   Witt's HSCA testimony does not come close to matching the 11/22/63 Umbrella Man image evidence. 15 yrs later, anyone would remember their walking down the Knoll directly toward Elm St vs standing still, pumping an umbrella, and facing the oncoming JFK Limo. I find it strange that people believe Witt claiming to be the Umbrella Man, yet they heave brickbats at Beverly Oliver claiming to be the Babushka Lady.   
70
Hi, Fred.

John Simkin has asked us to not discuss 9/11 on the JFKA board.

Wilkinson raised the subject in the context of the false accusations that I am an Anti-Semite.

I did go to the trouble today of starting a new thread on our 9/11 board for people-- including Wilkinson, Ben Cole, and Michael Griffith-- who still don't understand the 9/11 science data.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/32001-911-science-101-for-beginners/

I should point out that these Anti-Truthers (above) have not studied physics or chemistry at a collegiate or post-graduate level. 

In Griffith's case, disinformation is a job.

As for Grok-- it's merely regurgitating the ubiquitous government disinformation on the internet.

It's a GIGO model.  Garbage-In-Garbage-Out.

Cheers.

Dear Dr. William Niederhut,

You're full of high-fructose beans.

-- Tom
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10