Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
   You guys need to FOCUS on the 2nd film snippet down from the top. About halfway down that short wall, just down from the Pyracantha Bush, there is a WHITE OBJECT stretching over the short wall. There is Not supposed to be anything in this area behind the short wall. This WHITE OBJECT is shaped like a large zoom camera, or a telescope. It has a Black Circle around the end of it. Just like you see on a Zoom Camera. This WHITE OBJECT has always been extremely blurry on other assassination films, making it difficult to figure out what it might be. This snippet is the clearest I have seen this WHITE OBJECT to date. Whatever it is, it is pointed toward Elm St. It is either resting on that short wall or maybe attached to a tripod. It is barely taller than the short wall. What is that WHITE OBJECT?


It could very well be a spotter's scope...

However, the game-changing image that should not be overlooked, is Zapruder on a walkie talkie.
THAT is the one image that strongly suggests a coordinated ambush on the president... and then a deliberate cover-up...

Sooooo... all the crap about Zapruder having to be pressured to go back and get his camera... and then his expressing remorse over the assassination and crying CROCODILE TEARS... well... it's all crap... a pre-arranged story and drama for the public, to have us believe nothing was pre-arranged...


22
Mr. Brown,

With all due respect since you are one of the few LNs I have come to respect (not so much for your belief that Mr. Oswald is responsible for Mr. Tippett's demise as much as for your genuine passion for Justice). We have rarely agreed upon anything since my initial foray into researching this matter in May, 2014 but there's just something about you that inspires love of country and patriotism. I respect that in you sir.

Now, that said, let me remind you that Officer Hill identified the bullets that led to Mr. Tippitts' demise as coming from a semiautomatic weapon (not a revolver later planted on an innocent party). 

Look no further than a bunch of lying treasonous cowards who were and are responsible for hatching a hastily contrived script to frame an innocent man. The wrongly-accused--Mr. Oswald--did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

Last post for the Summer, best to you & yours Mr. Brown for a spectacular, happy, healthy and safe Summer sir.

Thanks Alan, I appreciate your words, that's very kind.  I wish the same for you.

As for the shell casings, if they were fired from an automatic weapon...

Why were two of the shell casings found about thirty feet from the patrol car and the other two found over one hundred feet from the patrol car?  Automatic shell casings would have been found right there at the patrol car where the shooter was standing as he fired off the shots.

Why did multiple eyewitnesses describe the man, as he fled, manually unloading the weapon?  Automatic casings would not require being unloaded manually; they would have been automatically ejected after each shot was fired.
23

Sorry, but this is total fiction. Again, no FMJ bullet in the known history of forensic science has deposited a fragment, much less multiple fragments, at/near the entry point when striking a skull.
You may want to review some actual tests.  Here is a video showing an FMJ bullet going though an iron plate:
Do you see all that lead on the entry side of the plate?  How did it get there?
see:

24
Mr. Brown,

With all due respect since you are one of the few LNs I have come to respect (not so much for your belief that Mr. Oswald is responsible for Mr. Tippett's demise as much as for your genuine passion for Justice). We have rarely agreed upon anything since my initial foray into researching this matter in May, 2014 but there's just something about you that inspires love of country and patriotism. I respect that in you sir.

Now, that said, let me remind you that Officer Hill identified the bullets that led to Mr. Tippitts' demise as coming from a semiautomatic weapon (not a revolver later planted on an innocent party). 

Look no further than a bunch of lying treasonous cowards who were and are responsible for hatching a hastily contrived script to frame an innocent man. The wrongly-accused--Mr. Oswald--did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

Last post for the Summer, best to you & yours Mr. Brown for a spectacular, happy, healthy and safe Summer sir.
25
Jackie is looking directly at him from the left as the shot blows out the right side of his head , yet her immediate reaction is to look straight back behind her. right
 You can tell before She ever gets on the trunk that she is sure every bit of material flew directly behind them to the left, over his head to the left ,opposite the direction of his wound on the right side of his head.

Howdy, Mr. Phillips

Welcome to the forum. That particular shot came from the front of the presidential limousine. No bullet being fired from behind the presidential limousine could veer off to the right-side in mid-flight, catch up to its intended target and then subsequently veer back to the left to impact the decisive wound upon President Kennedy.
Interestingly enough, even one of the motorcade motorcycle-officers--a Mr. Hargis (Bobby) I believe, riding to the rear left of the presidential limousine was actually hit by blood splatter & brain matter from that obvious shot from the front of the presidential limousine.

Please be wary of anyone trying to convince you that that particular shot came from behind the presidential limousine. It did not.

It's amazing what a bunch of lying treasonous cowards will do and say after ambushing an unarmed duly elected representative of the People. The wrongly-accused--Mr. Oswald--did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.
26
The first clip from the Mark Bell Film shows Zapruder walking from his perch and at the last second turning back toward the pergola... And we see Sitzman turned toward the pergola, and Charles Hester standing in the background, and his wife, Beatrice, still sitting on the ground where he left her...
 
The next clip from the Mark Bell Film shows Zapruder in the pergola with his back to the camera, Sitzman still turned looking around, and Charles Hester standing in the background...

The last clip shows Charles and Beatrice Hester in the pergola, with Zapruder who is most likely talking on a walkie-talkie...

Yeah... Very likely they were all part of the dirty deed...













   You guys need to FOCUS on the 2nd film snippet down from the top. About halfway down that short wall, just down from the Pyracantha Bush, there is a WHITE OBJECT stretching over the short wall. There is Not supposed to be anything in this area behind the short wall. This WHITE OBJECT is shaped like a large zoom camera, or a telescope. It has a Black Circle around the end of it. Just like you see on a Zoom Camera. This WHITE OBJECT has always been extremely blurry on other assassination films, making it difficult to figure out what it might be. This snippet is the clearest I have seen this WHITE OBJECT to date. Whatever it is, it is pointed toward Elm St. It is either resting on that short wall or maybe attached to a tripod. It is barely taller than the short wall. What is that WHITE OBJECT?
27
Litwin:  ... it comes together with Freddie fries and an extra McAdamsburger.

Dear Karl,

The important thing is that you, like all JFKA conspiracy theorists, are full of beans.

Tell Alan Dale at the so-called Education Forum to tell John Newman that KGB officer Sergey Papushin (IJDECANTER / FLASH RUN), the guy who said Oswald was an agent for the Belarussian KGB, was discredited as a source in the Aleksandr Zhomov (PROLOGUE) false-defector case by former Soviet/East European Division Chief Milton Bearden in his book, The Main Enemy, and by one of the CIA analysts who helped uncover Aldrich Ames, Sandra Grimes, in her book, Circle of Treason.

-- Tom
28
Litwin:
Quote
More Morley Nothingburgers on the way
... it comes together with Freddie fries and an extra McAdamsburger.
29
My handlers at the evil, evil you-know-where helped me figure it out.


ChatGPT gets it... and picks up on the implications of Zapruder on a walkie talkie... AND why LN'rs should be very, very disturbed about this:

If Abraham Zapruder were seen using a walkie-talkie inside the pergola minutes after JFK’s assassination, it would raise serious historical and conspiratorial implications, primarily because:
 Any account of Zapruder lingering near the pergola afterward would be new and conflicting.

1) It Suggests Potential Coordination
    •    A walkie-talkie implies communication with others. If true, this could be construed by conspiracy theorists as evidence Zapruder was part of an operational team, possibly coordinating or observing something more than just filming a presidential visit.
    •    That would undermine his role as an innocent bystander and turn him into a potential co-conspirator...

2) The Pergola Was Near the Grassy Knoll
    •    Seeing Zapruder in or behind the pergola could implicate him in logistical positioning or communication, perhaps supporting theories of multiple shooters or a coordinated ambush.

Summary:

If Zapruder was truly seen using a walkie-talkie inside the pergola right after JFK’s assassination, it would dramatically alter his perceived role and fuel deep conspiracy interpretations.







30
There you go, again!


Glad you got the humor in that... ha, ha! :D

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10