You do Not find it significant that: (1) while JFK is under fire on Elm St, (2) a car is simultaneously traveling down the Elm St Ext, (3) this same car then parks in a "NO PARKING At Any Time" zone, (4) sitting directly across from the TSBD "wide open" Huge Gates, (5) is swarmed by the DPD, and (6) then sits in this same spot for 3+ Hrs?
No, I do not. After the shooting, traffic on Houston and Elm came to a standstill. I do not find it at all suspicious that the occupant(s) of that car would realize they weren't going to be able to get out any time soon.
There is nothing "wild", "imaginative", or "speculative" about this.
Of course it is. You have leapt to a conclusion without considering other mundane explanations.
These are FACTS! And the FACTS continue to mount.
It is a fact a car was there. You've offered nothing that connects it to the assassination. That is all assumption on your part.
The DPD "swarming" of this car is a recent Image Evidence Brick added to the "Wall Of Evidence" proving this car was an intended "getaway" car.
You have a very strange concept of what constitutes proof. Assumptions are not proof and all you ever offer are your assumptions.
And, at 45-60 minutes after the kill shot, the DPD were thinking the very same thing.
I have no idea what the DPD was thinking at any given time but there is no evidence they connected the car to the assassination. Your "discoveries" are not the least bit significant if all you can offer are your assumptions.