There are certain facts that most can agree on:
1) Shots were fired at 12:30 from the 6th floor. That means that someone was on that floor at that moment.
2) Oswald's rifle was left on that floor and was used to fire the shots (some of the more fringe CTers might take issue with this but it appears conclusive even to many CTers). You don't even have to accept that, however, in this context.
3) The 6th floor shooter escaped that floor unnoticed regardless of any pedantic fraction of a second attempted reconstruction of witness movements in the building.
4) The only apparent way for anyone on the 6th floor to get off that floor after the shots were fired is - wait for it - DOWN THE STAIRS. The elevators were not in a position to be used.
5) No one was noticed going down the stairs.
6) Oswald was seen on the 2nd floor a couple of minutes later.
All of this tells us that whoever fired the shots at 12:30 - whether Oswald or someone else - managed to escape unnoticed by going down the stairs. We know this is possible without engaging in a pedantic down to the second analysis of witness statements because the facts demonstrate it must have happened. The only quibble is whether the evidence puts Oswald on the 6th floor as the shooter. Not whether anyone could get down those stairs unnoticed. Someone did.
1) Shots were fired at 12:30 from the 6th floor. That means that someone was on that floor at that moment.Really? Are you sure that everybody agrees with that? Or even just "most"?
2) Oswald's rifle was left on that floor and was used to fire the shots (some of the more fringe CTers might take issue with this but it appears conclusive even to many CTers). You don't even have to accept that, however, in this context. There was a rifle left on the 6th floor, that much is true. And it may well be that it was used to fire shots. There is, however, nothing conclusive about your claim that the rifle belonged to Oswald or that it was fired on 11/22/63.
3) The 6th floor shooter escaped that floor unnoticed regardless of any pedantic fraction of a second attempted reconstruction of witness movements in the building.Well, it is certainly true that a 6th floor shooter (if he was there) did escape from that floor, but how that was done has never been explained or examined. The claim that the shooter went down the stairs directly after the shots is, if you think about, something rather stupid. Why would such a shooter risk running into people coming up on those narrow stairs? Sometimes the best strategy is to hide in plain sight. The 6th floor is big enough to hide for a while behind some boxes and reappear, pretending to be law enforcement officer searching like the others, when a bunch of people have arrived on the 6th floor. It's easy to slip away in chaos. Just a theory, mind you, but then the same goes for the shooter running down the stairs just after the shots. Obviously, you are free to dismiss this possibility, but if you do, please tell us why you dismiss it?
4) The only apparent way for anyone on the 6th floor to get off that floor after the shots were fired is - wait for it - DOWN THE STAIRS. The elevators were not in a position to be used. True... the question that you need to answer is
when did that person (shooter if you like) actually go down the stairs?
5) No one was noticed going down the stairs.Exactly my point. People had other things to do to notice just one more guy going up or down the stairs.
6) Oswald was seen on the 2nd floor a couple of minutes later. True, if Truly and Baker are to be believed, but he could have been there for some time. Carolyn Arnold said she saw him there minutes prior to the assassination. But I'm sure you feel she lied, right?
All of this tells us that whoever fired the shots at 12:30 - whether Oswald or someone else - managed to escape unnoticed by going down the stairs. We know this is possible without engaging in a pedantic down to the second analysis of witness statements because the facts demonstrate it must have happened. The only quibble is whether the evidence puts Oswald on the 6th floor as the shooter. Not whether anyone could get down those stairs unnoticed. Someone did. So, you just want us to assume that "someone" was in fact Oswald? Just as I thought, no actual evidence, just assumptions!