Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 05:23:20 AM »
Dan made a good point about JBCs own estimate of Z234 as the approx point at which JC felt the effect of a bullet hitting him.

It’s only 0.5 sec approx after the Z 224 abrupt forward motion of JCs right shoulder.

It’s certainly without doubt well before Z270.

There do not seem to be any other forum members who agree with Andrew that JCs reaction at Z224 was merely just from hearing a shot fired at Z195 approx.

Yet  the Willis girl stopping approx Z195 and the Betzner 186 photo and Willis Z205 photo are valid reasons to consider that the 1st  loud shot heard was at Z195-200 approx.

Is there any way to reconcile a Z195 loud shot with  a Z224 loud shot?
Zeon, if the first shot was around z195 how long do you think it would take for JBC to recognze it was a rifle shot, realize that an assassination was unfolding, complete his turn around to check on JFK and then turn back to be facing forward at z222? JBC could not have heard a shot at z195 and done all that in less than a 1.5 seconds.  So a first shot at z195 means that JBC is beginning his turn to check JFK after he emerges from behind the sign.
2
I still think the main problem is the insistence on keeping the Mcwatters bus ride part of the WC theory valid.

Imo that’s in serious question because of Bledsoe on the bus , claiming to have seen a hole  in the sleeve of a brown shirt Oswald was not wearing until AFTER he left the boarding house.

Are we CTs mistaken that Oswald was Wearing the reddish brown shirt at the TSBD and did not change out of that shirt to the other brown shirt with hole in sleeve until after he got to his boarding room?

And Mcwatters did not.actually ID Oswald imo.

The bus transfer ticket had no prints of either Oswald or Mcwatters on it which it should have had especially being paper. Given the pressure the FBI and Fritz were under from LBJ to make sure Oswald was their man, it’s not that unreasonable to suggest the transfer ticket may have been embellishment”.

So why not  just discard this part of the WC theory of Oswald as “unconfirmed” and just go with the more substantial witness Whaley the Taxi driver and his manifest which had Oswald entering his cab somewhere  between 12:30 and not later than 12:45?

In that scenario, Oswald had left TSBD by 3 minutes post shots ( presuming DPD officer Barnett locked the doors as he claimed ) and then 7 minutes later after traveling the 7 blocks to go directly to the taxi , Oswald could easily have entered Whaleys taxi as early as 12:40. That makes then easy for Oswald to have been at 10th and Patton by 1:07-1:08 and then all witness clocks and estimates match up and the 1:15 DOA document makes sense.



3
Fair points, Richard.  In addition to that, this particular conspiracy advocate has misrepresented my position time and time again.  He's doing it in this very thread.  Once they begin doing that, I lose interest in discussing anything with them.

In addition to that, this particular conspiracy advocate has misrepresented my position time and time again.  He's doing it in this very thread.

And yet, when asked to explain in detail what that so-called misrepresentation is, you never answer.... Go figure!

Btw, can you please point to any of my posts in which I have actually advocated a conspiracy of any kind?
4
Hi Zeon.  Obviously there is no way to know what that wretched waif was thinking.  One thing is for sure, though.  He was making his way (whether purposeful or not) in the general direction of the bus stop at Jefferson and Marsalis.  He had a transfer for that bus which was good until 1:15.

One thing is for sure, though.  He was making his way (whether purposeful or not) in the general direction of the bus stop at Jefferson and Marsalis.  He had a transfer for that bus which was good until 1:15.

How is that something you think is "for sure"?

If he was there at all, how is walking east on 10th street the same as walking "in the general direction of the bus stop at Jefferson and Marsalis".

Instead of making meaningless statements, why don't you try, for once, to say something that's actually based on real facts rather than your usual speculation?
5
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Zeon Mason on May 28, 2024, 11:52:49 PM »
Dan made a good point about JBCs own estimate of Z234 as the approx point at which JC felt the effect of a bullet hitting him.

It’s only 0.5 sec approx after the Z 224 abrupt forward motion of JCs right shoulder.

It’s certainly without doubt well before Z270.

There do not seem to be any other forum members who agree with Andrew that JCs reaction at Z224 was merely just from hearing a shot fired at Z195 approx.

Yet  the Willis girl stopping approx Z195 and the Betzner 186 photo and Willis Z205 photo are valid reasons to consider that the 1st  loud shot heard was at Z195-200 approx.

Is there any way to reconcile a Z195 loud shot with  a Z224 loud shot?

I don’t think so because of these reasons:

1. Altgens did not hear but one shot fired prior to his Z255 photo.
2. The gap of time between Z195 and Z224 is only approx 1.5 secs which rules out a solitary gunman using an MC rifle.

So I propose a synthesis that preserves Z224 hit theory while retaining part of Andrews Z195 theory.  It is the 2 gunman theory revisited except one gunman had a suppressed rifle. Both gunman fire from locations behind the JFK limo.

gunman  no.1 was located at the TSBD  6th floor SE window

gunman no.2 was located behind JFK limo also and possibly on the same 6th floor of TSBD but at the SW window ( observed by Rowland at 12:15, this gunman had to retreat temporarily due to presence of BRW on the floor until 12:24, but after BRW left, gunman no.2 returned to the SW window by 12:26

The sequence of shots:

1. Gunman no.1 with either the MC rifle or similar loud sounding bolt action rifle fired the 1st loud shot at z195 which missed JFK, deflected by tree foliage.

Altgens, Betzer, Willis, JC , Euins , Norman heard this shot.

2. Gunman no.2 fired the 2nd shot, a suppressed shot at Z224 which hit both JFK and JC causing the reactions of both men to appear simultaneous.

Notes here:
A. Euins may have heard this suppressed shot being as close to the TSBD as he was , but few other people did. It may explain why Euins said he heard FOUR shots!)
B. The bullet fired by gunman no.2 was perhaps not an MC bullet but was a pointed shaped bullet found on stretcher by witness. The bullet was replaced with CE 399 and a fake report attributed to FBI agent Odum claimed the witness had IDd CE 399, when In fact witness had not!
C. The suppressed shot may explain late reactions of SS agents to a loud shot at Z 195 uncertain where that shot came from, thus not looking back yet to TSBD even as late as Z 207
D. Because Z195 was a miss , actions from DC man and umbrella man just before Z224 , may have been signaling this.

3. Gunman no.1 at the TSBD 6th floor SE window had reloaded his bolt action rifle since firing 3.5 secs earlier at Z195 , he fired the 3rd shot, (which is the 2nd loud shot heard ) at Z260-Z270  which is after Z 255 thus the 2nd shot heard by Altgens only after taking his Z255 photo.
(This shot missed just high of JFK s head and struck curb near Tague.)

Notes here:

C. Harold Norman on the 5th floor TSBD just beneath gunman no.1, heard this shot as the 2nd loud shot and then Norman looked at the JFK limo and saw  that JFK had slumped to his left.
4. Gunman no.1 reloads again in approx 2.7 secs and because the limo had slowed to 8mph gunman no.1 was able to score the Z313 head shot.

Final note: the above sequence also preserves the majority heard 1……2..3 shots pattern.
6
Bill-
It's hopeless.  That is why I no longer respond to our resident contrarian.  Every interaction goes down the same rabbit hole.  An amazing pattern repeated on every thread on this forum.  Here he has taken issue with why Oswald would "end up on a go nowhere suburban street" if he were fleeing from the assassination.  A false and misleading premise, but we are left in a sense of wonderment as to how the contrarian would answer his own question when Oswald he was supposed to be at his place of employment at this time.  What would Oswald be doing if he had just assassinated the president and was on the run is obvious.  Trying to escape.  What do we know about his circumstances?  We know that he didn't own or have access to a car.  We know that he did ride the bus.  We know that he had a bus transfer in his pocket.  We know that he must have been familiar with the local bus routes as his primary means of transportation.  We know that he had recently taken a bus to Mexico City and was familiar with the drill.  None of that matters to the flat Earthers who suggest that no conclusion can ever be reached that they don't want to accept absent a time machine or Ouija board.  Any manner of reasoned logic supported by the facts and evidence is rejected for that reason without providing any alternative explanation.  It is a tortured exercise to suggest doubt by any means.  No effort to shed light on what happened or even attempt to explain the consequences of their own objections having validity. The discussion stops and ends with taking issue as to the evidence of Oswald's guilt.

Fair points, Richard.  In addition to that, this particular conspiracy advocate has misrepresented my position time and time again.  He's doing it in this very thread.  Once they begin doing that, I lose interest in discussing anything with them.
7
The only theory I ever read to try to explain why Oswald was going SE was that Patton st leads to the Marsalles Zoo, and that Oswald was intending to hide out at the Zoo and then jump on board at night on an empty box car on the railroad that passes nearby the Zoo.

Hi Zeon.  Obviously there is no way to know what that wretched waif was thinking.  One thing is for sure, though.  He was making his way (whether purposeful or not) in the general direction of the bus stop at Jefferson and Marsalis.  He had a transfer for that bus which was good until 1:15.
8
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on May 28, 2024, 07:07:57 PM »
You can tell old Mason got all excited when he found the Itek Map, with its confirmation bias for his Looney Tunes Theory. He jumped all over it without one bit of scrutiny.

My comparison of the Itek Map with the Cutler Plat and Topo Map showed everything was off with the Itek Map. For example, they have the limousine centered in the roadway, but it was more towards the south of the center lane. If you draw a sight-line from Itek's location for Betzner through Itek's location for the lamppost, it is not where the lamppost dissects the pergola in the photograph. To Mason's perspective-addled eye, though, it would have been a match because he needs the Itek Map for his Theory.

I agree with you that the placement of Betzner is wrong. (Itek has Betzner where Willis was.  But they have Willis on the grass off the pavement where Croft was. It appears to me that they mistook Willis for Betzner and Croft for Willis). 

One can see in z186 that Betzner is much closer to the curb than to the north pool retaining wall  I agree with your placement.  When you plot the sightline from Betzner through the lamppost it fits perfectly to what we see in Betzner's z186 photo.



So the lamp post is in the right location on the Itek map (as we would expect since they used a surveyed map). 

The Itek map plots the position of JFK.  Since the car left tire was a foot or so inside the south lane marker and since the lanes were 12 feet wide, JFK would be about 6 feet from that lane marker ie in the middle of the middle lane, which is where he is shown. So there is nothing wrong with the placement of JFK.

I have plotted the position of JFK being in line with Zapruder and Betzner at z180.  We can see that z180 is just before JFK passes by the lamp post (red line and dark blue intersection).

Betzner’s z186 photo shows JFK in line with the middle of the Stemmons sign.  Plotting that sight line on the map, we can see that JFK was opposite the lamp post at z186 (pink line).

So at z193, JFK was 7 frames (7 feet at 1 foot/frame) past the lamp post.  At that point we can see in the Secret Service frames that he was completely in the clear from the SN 7 feet past the lamp post (z193).
Quote
Nothing wrong with the Secret Service footage. But a lot wrong with how you use a muddy copy and the whiteness of the limousine to claim the foliage didn't block the view from the SN.
Where do you put JFK when he is clear of the oak tree?  What zframe do you say that corresponds to?
9
News - Off Topic - Weird & Wacky / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Richard Smith on May 28, 2024, 05:26:46 PM »
After months of denying that the trials against Trump are politically motivated, the Biden campaign staged a phony press event right in front of the courthouse.  They rolled out crazy Robert De Niro who tried to read the speech they wrote for him with almost no success.  As an actor, you might think he could get his lines right but no go.  Among other things, he argued that New Yorkers welcome crazy people on their streets.  It is part of their "culture" according to De Niro (perhaps he is right since he was on the street).  Next he argued that Trump will "never" leave if elected.  What does this mean?  That Trump is immortal?  Trump left after the 2020 election.  De Niro seemed shocked when the people of NYC who he was praising started to question him.  He flees in his limo back into his woke bubble.  Finally, they rolled out the only two Capitol Police officers who apparently are willing to tow the leftist line.  These are the same two police officers that you ever see from that day at these leftist events.  Where are the dozens or hundreds of other such police officers who were there that day?  Never see any of them except these two publicity seeking guys.  What a disgrace.  At least the facade is off.  Trump's success in turning the Stalinist-show trial to his advantage forced Grandpa Joe's hand.  He is now fully embracing his role as someone trying to imprison his political opponent as a means of winning the election. Another new low for Biden's Americans.
10
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Jerry Organ on May 28, 2024, 04:21:53 PM »
Do you agree that JFK was clear of the tree branches when he was between the lamp post and the Thornton Freeway sign?

If yes, what zframe does that correspond to? If it is not between z186 and z200, tell us what is wrong with the Itek analysis.

You can tell old Mason got all excited when he found the Itek Map, with its confirmation bias for his Looney Tunes Theory. He jumped all over it without one bit of scrutiny.



My comparison of the Itek Map with the Cutler Plat and Topo Map showed everything was off with the Itek Map. For example, they have the limousine centered in the roadway, but it was more towards the south of the center lane. If you draw a sight-line from Itek's location for Betzner through Itek's location for the lamppost, it is not where the lamppost dissects the pergola in the photograph. To Mason's perspective-addled eye, though, it would have been a match because he needs the Itek Map for his Theory.

If no, what is wrong with the Secret Service December 1963 reenactment?

Simple questions.




Nothing wrong with the Secret Service footage. But a lot wrong with how you use a muddy copy and the whiteness of the limousine to claim the foliage didn't block the view from the SN.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10