Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1

The queen mary was behind the JFK limo. From the angle of the photo from the sniper’s nest we can clearly see the oak tree has just been cleared from the sniper’s view. In order for your ridiculous idea to be true, the running board agents would have to be taller than the branches of the oak tree. That clearly is not the case. You have shown once again that you are clueless.

   Come on Charles. You do Not know that the Back Shot was fired at the moment we are seeing the cross hairs on that STILL FRAME. The image you posted is actually 1 Film Frame removed from a Motion Picture. And again, Elm St was on a Downgrade. That puts the SS Agents on that (R) running board at a Higher Elevation/Above the JFK Limo/JFK.
2
   Thanks for providing the visual aid to prove my point. You put the Queen Mary with 2 Large SS Agents standing atop the (R) Running Board and those 2 Agents would be close to dead center on the cross hairs. Beautiful work.


The queen mary was behind the JFK limo. From the angle of the photo from the sniper’s nest we can clearly see the oak tree has just been cleared from the sniper’s view. In order for your ridiculous idea to be true, the running board agents would have to be taller than the branches of the oak tree. That clearly is not the case. You have shown once again that you are clueless.
3
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Ruby in Dealey Plaza?
« Last post by Fergus O'Brien on Today at 05:13:17 PM »
New to the forum so unsure if this has been discussed before

At the extreme left of the Altgens 6 and cropped out of most copies is the side view of a man in a grey hat who looks very similar to the photo of Ruby in the basement before shooting Oswald Both this man and the construction worker in the hard hat are not looking at the motorcade

I have some photos but cannot work out how to insert them in the post if someone can advise

there are photos of a man wearing sun glasses who bore resemblance to Ruby and who some have said was Ruby , the man (i dont know if he has been named ) was near the depository . i dont know if its the same man you refer to .but the man i speak of was not Ruby .i am in agreement with other posts here regarding his whereabouts . i will say that his whereabouts for me atleast cast doubt on his supposed devotion to his beloved president . i mean JFK his beloved president is passing by him very near to him , and yet he makes zero effort to go and see him . surely what business he had could have waited 10 or 20 minutes while he went and saw jfk ? .
4



   Thanks for providing the visual aid to prove my point. You put the Queen Mary with 2 Large SS Agents standing atop the (R) Running Board and those 2 Agents would be close to dead center on the cross hairs. Beautiful work.
5
From the Escalante book on the Cuban investigation into the Mexico City issue:



6
From former Cuban counterintelligence officer Fabian Escalante's book "The Cuba Files", pg. 130-132.

"Guillermo Ruiz was the translator in the conversation between Azcue and Oswald. He told Fabian Escalante that although he was not an expert in physiognomy, it was his opinion that the Oswald he saw on Mexican television was the one he saw in the consulate that day. Antonio Garcia Lara [who worked in the trade office at the Consulate] saw Oswald as he was leaving, and he had the same impression as Ruiz. Both of them disagreed with Azcue."

So we have two additional witnesses saying that they believed the man who visited the Cuban consulate *was* Oswald. Four in all: Mirabal, Duran, Ruiz and Garcia Lara. A problem with these later accounts, of course, is that Azcue never mentioned the two men, particularly Ruiz who supposedly helped translate for him. And Duran never mentioned them either. Very odd.

Again, the Cubans concluded it *was* Oswald who visited their consulate but they argue he was sent there by someone or some group - CIA or anti-Castro groups - to connect the assassination through him to Havana. Conspiracy believers gonna' conspiracy argue no matter what is presented.

More on the Cuban investigation can be read here: https://www.cuban-exile.com/doc_026-050/doc0027.html

So we have the Soviets saying it was Oswald, the Cubans saying it was Oswald and all sorts of other evidence but conspiracists ignore all of this and say it wasn't. Because of course.



7
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Ruby in Dealey Plaza?
« Last post by Richard Smith on Today at 01:34:37 PM »
It's difficult to recognize anyone in those grainy b&w films and photos.  It's not Ruby, though, because he was in the presence of several witnesses several blocks away.

WC:

Jack Ruby learned of the shooting of President Kennedy while in the second-floor advertising offices of the Dallas Morning News, five blocks from the Texas School Book Depository, where he had come Friday morning to place regular weekend advertisements for his two nightclubs.849 On arriving at the newspaper building at about 11 or 11:30 a.m., he talked briefly with two newspaper employees concerning some diet pills he had recommended to them.850 Ruby then went to the office of Morning News columnist, Tony Zoppi, where he states he obtained a brochure on his new master of ceremonies that he wanted to use in preparing copy for his advertisements. 851 Proceeding to the advertising department, he spoke with advertising employee Don Campbell from about noon until 12:25 p.m. when Campbell left the office.852 In addition to the business at hand, much of the conversation concerned Ruby's unhappiness over the financial condition of his clubs and his professed ability to handle the physical fights which arose in connection with the clubs.583 According to Campbell, Ruby did not mention the Presidential motorcade nor did he display any unusual behavior.854

About 10 minutes after the President had been shot but before word had spread to the second floor, John Newnam, an advertising department employee, observed Ruby sitting at the same spot where Campbell had left him.
8
News - Off Topic - Weird & Wacky / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Richard Smith on Today at 01:26:54 PM »
Old Joe is lagging in the polls with African Americans.  Particularly males.  So he goes to Morehouse to tell them that democracy doesn't work for them.  Huh?  These are graduates of a prestigious university who will go on to great careers.  But according to Sleepy Joe they are living in a racist society with no hope. 
9
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Charles Collins on Today at 12:17:18 PM »
Your theory would also have to explain why he reversed the order of the two events that he distinctly recalled: hearing a rifle shot then feeling the hit.  It would also help if there was evidence to support the theory.
I said that in many cases bullets are often not felt.    In this case, we have JBC describing the moment of impact because he felt it. Not pain. He felt impact.   I suggest that he felt it because it was a pristine 2000 fps 10 gram bullet hitting bone.  But that doesn't matter.   The evidence from JBC is that he felt it and the evidence from Nellie is that he recoiled from it and that it was the second shot.  The thigh wound was an oblique wound caused by a tumbling lower speed bullet striking the thigh butt-first and not interfering with any bodily function and which JBC said he never felt.  I am just suggesting that the trajectory from the SN through JFK's throat exit wound at around z190-195 goes to JBC's left side and the only wound on his left side was his left thigh AND the wound characteristics of the thigh wound fit being hit butt-first by a tumbling partially spent bullet.
Yes. The second bullet, although he said he would never believe that happened.  He never said that it was possible he was hit in the back by the first bullet - the one he heard, which is what Dan is arguing.


Your theory would also have to explain why he reversed the order of the two events that he distinctly recalled: hearing a rifle shot then feeling the hit.  It would also help if there was evidence to support the theory.

Technically, it is just an idea, like yours. A theory requires some testing, peer reviews, etc like the SBT has had over the past 60-plus years. We have been explaining the time distortion phenomenon. You just don’t appear to be listening. If I had not experienced it for myself during the snake strike encounter I might not be so adamant about this. I will try to explain what I experienced again and relate some of it to JBC’s recollections.
My instinctive reaction of jumping backwards (amygdala controlled) happened so fast and so automatic that is was already over with before I even “knew” what was going on. I was hiking alone and was not scanning the trail ahead of me like I should have been. Apparently the snake was camouflaged and blended into the terrain (looked like other tree roots in the area). The amygdala portion of my brain must have seen some movement of the snake (out of the corner of my eye) preparing to strike. But I do not have a memory of actually seeing this movement, only a vague sense of it. It was only after I had instinctively jumped backwards that I realized what was happening. This delay between the instinctive reaction and being cognizant of what was happening is the time it normally takes our brains to form thoughts. Thus it was shown to me that the amygdala can react much faster than the rest of our brains in life threatening situations. Research and read up on this if you want to know more.
Once I actually saw the snake and realized what was happening, everything was magnified and slowed way down. The reason I know that time was distorted in my memory is that gravity does not allow for objects such as striking snakes to just hang in mid air and fall very slowly (what seemed like 2 to 3 seconds) to the ground. I know from experience and schooling that it happens much faster than my memory tells me it happened. My senses (including my hearing) were “supercharged” by the amygdala portion of my brain. The thud that sounded when the snake finally did hit the ground seemed much louder than it possibly could have actually been.
JBC did not have a reference (like I did with gravity and the rate of acceleration of falling objects) to tell him that time in his memory had been distorted. JBC does say that he instinctively turned toward where he sensed the shot came from. I relate JBC’s instinctive turn to my instinctive jump backwards. Since JBC was already turned partially to his right, I think this instinctive reaction could have been simply a very quick head turn (much like Rosemary’s instinctive reaction that we can see on the Z-film). JBC said he realized that he didn’t see JFK out of the corner of his eye as he would have expected, so THEN he decided to turn to his left. It was during his turn that he felt the hit. My idea is that time was distorted for JBC during this (much like the snake strike was in my experience). It does take time for our brains to form thoughts and thus for us realize what is happening (my experience is a good example). If time was distorted for JBC during this thought forming period (similar to my experience with the slow motion snake strike), he could have a distorted memory (that there was more time between when he reacted to the sound and when he felt the impact than there actually was). However, in JBC’s case, he had no way of know about the time distortion (like I did with the snake encounter and gravity reference). I hope that some of this makes sense. It is not an easy thing to try to describe.
10
There are other photos of what appears to be that same man near the entrance to the TSBD. I don’t remember off the top of my head which photos they are. But I believe that in one of them the clarity is clear enough so that it does indicate that he is not Jack Ruby. Maybe someone will respond with the other photos. Also, there is credible evidence that Ruby was in the newspaper offices at the time. It is interesting that both this man and the construction worker appear to be looking toward the TSBD (where the shots originated). I would assume that would be their reaction to the sound of the shot(s).
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10