Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Charles Collins on Today at 12:17:18 PM »
Your theory would also have to explain why he reversed the order of the two events that he distinctly recalled: hearing a rifle shot then feeling the hit.  It would also help if there was evidence to support the theory.
I said that in many cases bullets are often not felt.    In this case, we have JBC describing the moment of impact because he felt it. Not pain. He felt impact.   I suggest that he felt it because it was a pristine 2000 fps 10 gram bullet hitting bone.  But that doesn't matter.   The evidence from JBC is that he felt it and the evidence from Nellie is that he recoiled from it and that it was the second shot.  The thigh wound was an oblique wound caused by a tumbling lower speed bullet striking the thigh butt-first and not interfering with any bodily function and which JBC said he never felt.  I am just suggesting that the trajectory from the SN through JFK's throat exit wound at around z190-195 goes to JBC's left side and the only wound on his left side was his left thigh AND the wound characteristics of the thigh wound fit being hit butt-first by a tumbling partially spent bullet.
Yes. The second bullet, although he said he would never believe that happened.  He never said that it was possible he was hit in the back by the first bullet - the one he heard, which is what Dan is arguing.


Your theory would also have to explain why he reversed the order of the two events that he distinctly recalled: hearing a rifle shot then feeling the hit.  It would also help if there was evidence to support the theory.

Technically, it is just an idea, like yours. A theory requires some testing, peer reviews, etc like the SBT has had over the past 60-plus years. We have been explaining the time distortion phenomenon. You just don’t appear to be listening. If I had not experienced it for myself during the snake strike encounter I might not be so adamant about this. I will try to explain what I experienced again and relate some of it to JBC’s recollections.
My instinctive reaction of jumping backwards (amygdala controlled) happened so fast and so automatic that is was already over with before I even “knew” what was going on. I was hiking alone and was not scanning the trail ahead of me like I should have been. Apparently the snake was camouflaged and blended into the terrain (looked like other tree roots in the area). The amygdala portion of my brain must have seen some movement of the snake (out of the corner of my eye) preparing to strike. But I do not have a memory of actually seeing this movement, only a vague sense of it. It was only after I had instinctively jumped backwards that I realized what was happening. This delay between the instinctive reaction and being cognizant of what was happening is the time it normally takes our brains to form thoughts. Thus it was shown to me that the amygdala can react much faster than the rest of our brains in life threatening situations. Research and read up on this if you want to know more.
Once I actually saw the snake and realized what was happening, everything was magnified and slowed way down. The reason I know that time was distorted in my memory is that gravity does not allow for objects such as striking snakes to just hang in mid air and fall very slowly (what seemed like 2 to 3 seconds) to the ground. I know from experience and schooling that it happens much faster than my memory tells me it happened. My senses (including my hearing) were “supercharged” by the amygdala portion of my brain. The thud that sounded when the snake finally did hit the ground seemed much louder than it possibly could have actually been.
JBC did not have a reference (like I did with gravity and the rate of acceleration of falling objects) to tell him that time in his memory had been distorted. JBC does say that he instinctively turned toward where he sensed the shot came from. I relate JBC’s instinctive turn to my instinctive jump backwards. Since JBC was already turned partially to his right, I think this instinctive reaction could have been simply a very quick head turn (much like Rosemary’s instinctive reaction that we can see on the Z-film). JBC said he realized that he didn’t see JFK out of the corner of his eye as he would have expected, so THEN he decided to turn to his left. It was during his turn that he felt the hit. My idea is that time was distorted for JBC during this (much like the snake strike was in my experience). It does take time for our brains to form thoughts and thus for us realize what is happening (my experience is a good example). If time was distorted for JBC during this thought forming period (similar to my experience with the slow motion snake strike), he could have a distorted memory (that there was more time between when he reacted to the sound and when he felt the impact than there actually was). However, in JBC’s case, he had no way of know about the time distortion (like I did with the snake encounter and gravity reference). I hope that some of this makes sense. It is not an easy thing to try to describe.
2
There are other photos of what appears to be that same man near the entrance to the TSBD. I don’t remember off the top of my head which photos they are. But I believe that in one of them the clarity is clear enough so that it does indicate that he is not Jack Ruby. Maybe someone will respond with the other photos. Also, there is credible evidence that Ruby was in the newspaper offices at the time. It is interesting that both this man and the construction worker appear to be looking toward the TSBD (where the shots originated). I would assume that would be their reaction to the sound of the shot(s).
3

Goofy.  I didn't speculate.  I stated a fact.


I have news for you, Jackass... IF Oswald wanted to get to Jefferson and Marsalis, he was walking pretty much the most direct line to that point from the rooming house and that most direct line included taking Tenth Street from Crawford to the area of Marsalis and Jefferson.  That was my point and it is not speculation, it is a fact.  Look at a damn map.

Goofy.  I didn't speculate.  I stated a fact.

Really? So, now it's suddenly a fact that Oswald was walking to the Marsalis line bus stop on Jefferson?

I have news for you, Jackass... IF Oswald wanted to get to Jefferson and Marsalis, he was walking pretty much the most direct line to that point from the rooming house and that most direct line included taking Tenth Street from Crawford to the area of Marsalis and Jefferson.  That was my point and it is not speculation, it is a fact.  Look at a damn map.

pretty much the most direct line? It's pretty amazing what you consider to be a fact.


First you claim to have stated as fact that Oswald was walking to the Marsalis bus stop on Jefferson only to follow it up with "If Oswald wanted to get to Jefferson and Marsalis"

Could you please make up your mind?

Is it really a fact that Oswald was walking to the Marsalis bus stop (and if so, what is your evidence for that?) or are you just speculating that he may have walked that way?
4
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Ruby in Dealey Plaza?
« Last post by Warren Cox on Today at 09:38:50 AM »
       

   



5
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: Ruby in Dealey Plaza?
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 08:52:06 AM »
Use Postimages site.
After uploading the photo to this site there is an option to save it for a forum. Hit that then paste in the Post Reply box
6
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Ruby in Dealey Plaza?
« Last post by Warren Cox on Today at 05:31:10 AM »
New to the forum so unsure if this has been discussed before

At the extreme left of the Altgens 6 and cropped out of most copies is the side view of a man in a grey hat who looks very similar to the photo of Ruby in the basement before shooting Oswald Both this man and the construction worker in the hard hat are not looking at the motorcade

I have some photos but cannot work out how to insert them in the post if someone can advise
7
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 02:09:10 AM »


At the distance involved, it takes less than 1/10 of one second difference in time for the bullet to reach the target vs the time for the sound of the muzzle blast to reach the target. A blink of an eye takes about three times that amount of time.

I am trying to describe the perceived amount of time between when he heard the shot (so what if it was less than 1/10 of a second after it actually hit him) and the time that he actually FELT the hit in his back. His perception of that amount of time might also have been distorted due to his instinctual reaction (the amygdala in his brain taking control) as Dan and myself have been describing earlier in this thread.
Your theory would also have to explain why he reversed the order of the two events that he distinctly recalled: hearing a rifle shot then feeling the hit.  It would also help if there was evidence to support the theory.

Quote
Isn’t it you that claims he wouldn’t (if your idea were true) have felt a shot to his leg for over 4-seconds? Why would less than 1/10 of a second make a difference in your way of thinking?
I said that in many cases bullets are often not felt.    In this case, we have JBC describing the moment of impact because he felt it. Not pain. He felt impact.   I suggest that he felt it because it was a pristine 2000 fps 10 gram bullet hitting bone.  But that doesn't matter.   The evidence from JBC is that he felt it and the evidence from Nellie is that he recoiled from it and that it was the second shot.  The thigh wound was an oblique wound caused by a tumbling lower speed bullet striking the thigh butt-first and not interfering with any bodily function and which JBC said he never felt.  I am just suggesting that the trajectory from the SN through JFK's throat exit wound at around z190-195 goes to JBC's left side and the only wound on his left side was his left thigh AND the wound characteristics of the thigh wound fit being hit butt-first by a tumbling partially spent bullet.

Quote
The fact is that JBC himself later said it is possible that they were hit by the same bullet.
Yes. The second bullet, although he said he would never believe that happened.  He never said that it was possible he was hit in the back by the first bullet - the one he heard, which is what Dan is arguing.
8
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 01:13:58 AM »
My point is that it is not necessary to have Connally tell us how long it was between shots #1 and#2.

Mason Untruth #1
This was not your point at all. The false point you were making was that Connally put the two events over four seconds apart. You were saying that he wasn't the only witness who spaced the shots that far apart. You were not telling the truth.

What I should have said, just so you would not be confused, is that it is not just up to Connally to put that much time between the shots.

Connally is not consistent in his estimate of the time between shots. That’s not surprising. He was thinking about other things than counting the seconds.

 I have previously pointed out that JBC said the first two were 2 seconds apart and NOT literally a split second apart.  He also said on yet another occasion that all three took 10 to 12 seconds. He always said that heard the first shot and, after turning around to check on JFK, decided to turn back to the left.  How long does that take? 4 seconds. I don’t know. Maybe.

So we look at other witnesses who are consistent.

But your point, if I understand your theory correctly, is that there was no time between the shot he heard and the shot that hit him in the back ie. they were the same shot.  But JBC never said anything close to that. He always insisted they were separate shots.  You cannot use an argument to change his evidence to mean the opposite of what he meant.
9
News - Off Topic - Weird & Wacky / Re: U.S. Politics
« Last post by Richard Smith on Today at 12:59:03 AM »
Cohen admitted to stealing $60K from Trump today.  What else does he have to admit to having done to have this case dismissed?  Murder?  It's a travesty.  Even Old Joe in the midst of a paranoid dementia delusion should be able to comprehend that this is awful.
10
Actually, RFK Jr. does have a chance. Even though we're only in May and even though he's run only a fraction of the campaign ads that Trump and Biden have run, he's polling in the 15% range nationally and hovering around 20% in some states. So he most certainly has a chance.

RFK has no chance.  Zero.  Waste your vote but don't be delusional.  I can sympathize with a desire to rid the country of the old, corrupt, incompetent establishment that Old Joe represents, but a vote for RFK is wasted.  Trump is the last chance to do that.  He has a realistic chance of winning even with the "early" voting.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10