Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 04:21:38 AM »
Itek isn't deliberately spreading falsehoods, you are.
Do you agree that JFK was clear of the tree branches when he was between the lamp post and the Thornton Freeway sign?

If yes, what zframe does that correspond to? If it is not between z186 and z200, tell us what is wrong with the Itek analysis.

If no, what is wrong with the Secret Service December 1963 reenactment?

Simple questions.
2
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Dan O'meara on Today at 02:51:35 AM »
I showed you the position of JFK when clear of the foliage.  I showed you the map and Itek’s positions of JFK at the time of Betzner, z188 and Willis #5 (z202).  Are you suggesting that Itek was deliberately spreading falsehoods?

Itek isn't deliberately spreading falsehoods, you are.
You do little else as it's the only way you can peddle your demented theory.
Your methodology for determining when JFK was clear of the foliage is a joke, which keeps it perfectly aligned with everything else about your "theory".

Quote
We don’t know what Oswald was thinking.  He would have been able to track the car while it passed under the tree branches. So he could easily have shot just as JFK was clear of the tree.  It is conceivable that he could have fired before. 

I am not sure what you base z207 as the time JFK was clear of the tree branches as seen from the SN.  Are you using the flawed FBI recreation?

In any event there is certainly a change in JFK’s hand and head between z188 and z198 and we have evidence that the first shot was after z186 and before z202.

We don’t know what Oswald was thinking.

It doesn't matter what Oswald was thinking as he never took the shots.
But we do have very strong evidence that the shooter was visualising the kill zone moments before the motorcade entered Dealy Plaza:
This is from Ronald Fischer's WC testimony:

"And I looked up and I watched the man for, oh, I'd say, 10 or 15 seconds. It was until the first car came around the corner of Houston and Main. And, then, when that car did come around the corner, I took my attention off of the man in the window and started watching the parade. The man held my attention for 10 or 15 seconds, because he appeared uncomfortable for one, and, secondly, he wasn't watching-uh---he didn't look like he was watching for the parade. He looked like he was looking down toward the Trinity River and the triple underpass down at the end-toward the end of Ell Street. And--uh--all the time I watched him, he never moved his head, he never-he never moved anything. Just was there transfixed."

While everyone was looking for the motorcade entering Dealey Plaza, the shooter was "transfixed" on the kill zone. This is what he would have been looking at:



Above is the view from the SN window the assassin was staring at, "transfixed".
As far as the assassin is concerned there is only one feature of interest - the open stretch of road beyond the oak tree.
It makes perfect sense that the assassin has already made up his mind regarding his plan of action.
The idea that he starts taking random potshots as the limo passes the TSBD won't fly. The idea that he is rushing so much he needs to fire through the oak tree won't fly.
Look at the picture above, if you were the assassin, when would you pull the trigger?


In any event there is certainly a change in JFK’s hand and head between z188 and z198 and we have evidence that the first shot was after z186 and before z202

Of course there's a change, he's waving his hand and turning his head from looking to his right to looking forward. His interaction with Mary Woodward and her colleagues has passed and he is resuming his normal position. Why on earth would he stay frozen in the same position? Your desperation to try and grab on to anything you think might prop up your demented theory is astonishing.
THERE IS NOTHING in the Z-film to indicate JFK has been shot before he passes behind the Stemmons sign.
Not a single thing other than people projecting their own delusions onto what a head turn might mean. JFK's first noticeable, visual reaction begins after he has emerged from behind the Stemmons sign.

And the single piece of evidence that exists for a shot before z202 comes from Phil Willis' discredited money-making scam.
3
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Andrew Mason on Today at 02:00:13 AM »
JFK wasn't clear of the foliage until z207.  To state otherwise is a deliberate falsehood.
I showed you the position of JFK when clear of the foliage.  I showed you the map and Itek’s positions of JFK at the time of Betzner, z188 and Willis #5 (z202).  Are you suggesting that Itek was deliberately spreading falsehoods?

Quote
The idea that the assassin would shoot through the oak tree is utterly ridiculous. Any shot before z207 would have been through the branches of the oak tree.
We don’t know what Oswald was thinking.  He would have been able to track the car while it passed under the tree branches. So he could easily have shot just as JFK was clear of the tree.  It is conceivable that he could have fired before. 

I am not sure what you base z207 as the time JFK was clear of the tree branches as seen from the SN.  Are you using the flawed FBI recreation?

In any event there is certainly a change in JFK’s hand and head between z188 and z198 and we have evidence that the first shot was after z186 and before z202.
4
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Dan O'meara on May 27, 2024, 07:23:11 PM »
JFK wasn't clear of the foliage until z207.
To state otherwise is a deliberate falsehood.
The idea that the assassin would shoot through the oak tree is utterly ridiculous. Any shot before z207 would have been through the branches of the oak tree.
It is slightly insane that it has to be pointed out that the assassin knew in advance where the "kill zone" was to be.
He would have been fully aware of the oak tree.
He would never have dreamed of shooting while the limo was anywhere near the oak tree.
He would have waited until JFK was out in the open.
To suggest otherwise is demented.
5
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: When Was JBC Hit?
« Last post by Dan O'meara on May 27, 2024, 07:18:01 PM »
Her estimate was based on a review of still frames after watching the film.  Her view is inconsistent with her testimony.  We can see her looking back at JFK as he is grasping for his upper chest/throat well after z250.  She was adamant that she did not look back after the second shot. She was never asked when she thought JBC turned right after the first shot or when she thought JBC uttered “no, no , no” which she said was before the second shot. We can see JBC saying this in the z240s.

So, now Nellie's testimony is "inconsistent".
 :D  It didn't take you much to throw your star witness under the bus! You really are a piece of work.
Now you have deemed Nellie to be unreliable you have undermined almost half of your baloney evidence for why you completely ignore Connally selecting z234 as the moment he felt he was shot.

Quote
According to Altgens his no. 6 photo at z255 was taken after the first and before any other shots. So with JBC estimating that he was hit on the second shot at z234, there is a conflict with Altgens (as well as several dozen others as to the 1…...2...3 shot pattern).

There is absolutely no conflict with Altgens 6 when it is realised that Connally's estimate of when he was shot is an estimation of WHEN HE BECAME AWARE HE'D BEEN SHOT.
This point has been made over and over and over again so it's time to pin you down on it so you can't squirm out of it.
Here are a few questions I would like you to answer:

1] Do you agree with the following science?:

"Human thought takes time to form, and so the “right now” that we’re experiencing inside our skulls is always a little later than what’s going on in the outside world. It takes 500 milliseconds, or half a second, for sensory information from the outside world to be incorporated into conscious experience."

[ https://nymag.com/speed/2016/12/what-is-the-speed-of-thought.html#:~:text=Human%20thought%20takes%20time%20to,be%20incorporated%20into%20conscious%20experience. ]

2] Do you agree that in Z-frames z231 to z234 Connally is looking a little bit to the left of centre?

3] From Connally's statement below, would you agree he picked z234 as the frame he was shot because this was when he was looking "a little bit to the left of center"?

"I was turning to look back over my left shoulder into the back seat, but I never got that far in my turn. I got about in the position I am in now facing you, looking a little bit to the left of center, and then I felt like someone had hit me in the back."


6
Exposing the Backyard Photos by Herbert Blenner
https://jfk.boards.net/post/661/thread

7
Backyard Photos Authenticated By RIT Professor Andrew Davidhazy

8
How Fast Could Lee Harvey Oswalds Rifle Be Fired An Interesting 1960's Analysis

9
JFK Assassination The Dealey Plaza Storm Drain Sewer Theory 1992

10
JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate / Re: 4K Zapruder film
« Last post by Royell Storing on May 26, 2024, 01:48:23 AM »

  The 4K post of the Zapruder Film is exceptional. (Between the sprocket holes included). That other motion picture "thing" is pure baloney and does nothing but cast doubt on the 4K Zapruder Film.  Stay away from that garbage and stick with what you know is legit.   
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10