So, you are thinking if LHO had been in a slightly different location, then the different bullet’s trajectory through JFK’s neck would have placed the bullet striking JBC in a different location and resulting in striking a much thicker rib bone than the thin fifth rib and changing the resulting damage to the bullet?
No bullet exited JFK's throat. We know that because there was no hole through JFK's tie. No bullet exiting the shirt slits could have missed tearing through the middle of the bottom part of the tie knot, and no bullet could have magically weaved around the body of the knot to nick the top of the knot near the knot's left edge. That is Alice in Wonderland material.
We also know that no bullet exited the slits. Three Parkland doctors confirmed that the throat wound was above the collar/tie, so the slits could not have been the exit point in the shirt for a bullet exiting the throat wound. Also, no fabric was missing from the slits, and no metallic traces were found them. One of the Parkland nurses confirmed that the nurses made the slits, which explains why the jagged edges of a sharp scalpel can be seen in the slits under high magnification, as confirmed by Weisberg and then by Mantik.
The 2023 Knott Laboratory SBT trajectory analysis, the most sophisticated SBT analysis ever done, proves the SBT is impossible.
Are you familiar with any of the considerable evidence, including new evidence developed by Barry Ernest, that Oswald was not on the sixth floor during the shooting but was downstairs eating lunch and watching the motorcade, just as he told the police?
The bullet exiting JBC’s chest relatively intact is not your issue? Your thinking a jacketed metal bullet should have the identifying marks wiped clean while sliding along soft bone? The bullet then proceeded to the wrist at a much-reduced speed. It still had enough momentum to pass through the wrist again at an angle or even backwards and then barely embedded itself in his thigh. You have a problem with this why? How should the bullet have looked?
Did you simply forget the facts I've pointed out in my previous four replies when you wrote this? Every single SBT wound ballistics test has failed to duplicate the SBT, either because they failed to simulate key parts of the bullet's alleged journey or because the bullets emerged much more deformed than CE 399. Furthermore, no one has yet produced a single documented forensic case where a bullet did the damage attributed to CE 399 and emerged in the same condition.
Your only issue with this is how the bullet looked, even though it is obviously deformed?
Seriously? Please re-read my previous four replies. CE 399 is only slightly deformed at its base. Its nose is pristine. Its lands and grooves are intact. It is missing only 3-4 grains of its substance. Deep down, somewhere in your mind, you must know that no bullet could emerge in this condition after penetrating seven layers of skin, smashing 5 inches of rib bone, and shattering a radius bone.
The biggest problem with this whole train of thought is when conducting tests how do you fire a bullet out of a barrel of a rifle at a reduced velocity and also sideways or various angles to boot to be able to duplicate the deformation of the bullet along with the various injuries sustained?
Again, did you simply forget the facts I've presented in my previous replies when you wrote your response? You simply refuse to consider cold hard facts that destroy your SBT fantasy.