Oswald: No power lunch

[Martin Weidmann]

Re 'gaslighting', directed at you.. by we know who

_'What is really concerning is that somebody can loose grip on reality as much as you seem to have done'.
_'Try real hard and think again'
_'The riddle is in your confused mind. Nobody has a clue what you are rambling on about'

Oh, and these:
_'Your evasiveness tells me all I need to know'.
_'You don't bring anything of substance or value to the discussion'.
_'Play your silly games with somebody else'.
_'I'm done wasting my time on your nonsense'.

You and Nessan make a lovely couple 

Got anything of significance to say or will you keep it, as per usual, to superficial drivel about anything but the case?

[Bill Chapman]

You and Nessan make a lovely couple 

Got anything of significance to say or will you keep it, as per usual, to superficial drivel about anything but the case?

You and Nessan make a lovely couple
_Keep me out of your fantasies, creep

Got anything of significance to say or will you keep it, as per usual, to superficial drivel about anything but the case?
_ There's that gaslighting again. I'd say you're the superficial one. Not one post w/o an attempted insult from you. Which means you are frustrated b/c your b/s does not gain traction amongst LNers

Now lets see what people who were actually on scene re Tippit, for example, had to say

 
   billchapman
   William Whaley

   
   billchapman
   What Earlene Roberts witnessed around 1:00pm
   at Oswald's safe house 11.22.63   

   -------------------------------
   WITNESSES_GROUP OF 12+
   ------------------------------


   billchapman
   Helen Markham_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Ted Callaway_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Barbara Davis_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Victoria Davis_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Sam Guinyard_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Warren Reynolds_Group of 12

   More to come

[Martin Weidmann]

You and Nessan make a lovely couple
_Keep me out of your fantasies, creep

Got anything of significance to say or will you keep it, as per usual, to superficial drivel about anything but the case?
_ There's that gaslighting again. I'd say you're the superficial one. Not one post w/o an attempted insult from you. Which means you are frustrated b/c your b/s does not gain traction amongst LNers

Now lets see what people who were actually on scene re Tippit, for example, had to say

   More to come

I'd say you're the superficial one.

Who cares what you say? 

does not gain traction amongst LNers

Fool. Nothing will ever gain traction with a LN, unless it is preordained by the WC bible. That's a given.... In that respect LNs are  not much different than Trump followers.

What is most amusing is that LNs, like you and Nessan, can never ever enter into any kind of substantive discussion above a superficial level, nor can you actually explain any of the multitude of discrepancies in the evidence you so much like to ignore. The desperation to defend the undefenable is obvious in ever shallow reply, just like the one you just posted.

As for you, you're a one trick pony and your act is getting beyond boring.

[Bill Chapman]

I'd say you're the superficial one.

Who cares what you say? 

does not gain traction amongst LNers

Fool. Nothing will ever gain traction with a LN, unless it is preordained by the WC bible. That's a given.... In that respect LNs are  not much different than Trump followers.

What is most amusing is that LNs, like you and Nessan, can never ever enter into any kind of substantive discussion above a superficial level, nor can you actually explain any of the multitude of discrepancies in the evidence you so much like to ignore. You're a one trick pony and your act is getting beyond boring.

Who cares what you say? 
_You do: You just responded

Fool. Nothing will ever gain traction with a LN, unless it is preordained by the WC bible. That's a given.... In that respect LNs are  not much different than Trump followers.
_Again with the gaslighting 

What is most amusing is that LNs, like you and Nessan, can never ever enter into any kind of substantive discussion above a superficial level, nor can you actually explain any of the multitude of discrepancies in the evidence you so much like to ignore. You're a one trick pony and your act is getting beyond boring.
_Nothing more boring than the word salads that continue to ooze out of CT personal rabbit holes lo these many decades
_The 10tn & Patton witnesses rule the day no matter how hard & often you lot kiss Oswalds arse

[Martin Weidmann]

Who cares what you say? 
_You do: You just responded

Fool. Nothing will ever gain traction with a LN, unless it is preordained by the WC bible. That's a given.... In that respect LNs are  not much different than Trump followers.
_Again with the gaslighting 

What is most amusing is that LNs, like you and Nessan, can never ever enter into any kind of substantive discussion above a superficial level, nor can you actually explain any of the multitude of discrepancies in the evidence you so much like to ignore. You're a one trick pony and your act is getting beyond boring.
_Nothing more boring than the word salads that continue to ooze out of CT personal rabbit holes lo these many decades
_The 10tn & Patton witnesses rule the day no matter how hard & often you lot kiss Oswalds arse

_Again with the gaslighting 

And again, the voice of the insecure.....

Am I making you question your own reality or are you simply afraid that someday I might get you to do exactly that?

[Bill Chapman]

_Again with the gaslighting 

And again, the voice of the insecure.....

Am I making you question your own reality or are you simply afraid that someday I might get you to do exactly that?

My reality rests on what the Gang of 12+ witnesses saw, Slick

To wit:

 
   billchapman
   William Whaley

   
   billchapman
   What Earlene Roberts witnessed around 1:00pm
   at Oswald's safe house 11.22.63   

   -------------------------------
   WITNESSES_GROUP OF 12+
   ------------------------------


   billchapman
   Helen Markham_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Ted Callaway_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Barbara Davis_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Victoria Davis_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Sam Guinyard_Group of 12


   billchapman
   Warren Reynolds_Group of 12

   More to come

[Jack Nessan]

Your evasiveness tells me all I need to know. You don't bring anything of substance or value to the discussion.
Play your silly games with somebody else. I'm done wasting my time on your nonsense.

What evasive. You know what it is.

What riddle? Now we are seeing evasive.

[Jack Nessan]

Re 'gaslighting', directed at you.. by we know who

_'What is really concerning is that somebody can loose grip on reality as much as you seem to have done'.
_'Try real hard and think again'
_'The riddle is in your confused mind. Nobody has a clue what you are rambling on about'

Oh, and these:
_'Your evasiveness tells me all I need to know'.
_'You don't bring anything of substance or value to the discussion'.
_'Play your silly games with somebody else'.
_'I'm done wasting my time on your nonsense'.

His whole theory evaporated with the testimonies of Sgt Harkness and Det Sawyer. It was the end of the whole question of the timeline of Adams and Styles. He is just having a hard time with it. He will have to find something new to harp on.