Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Dan O'meara]

Thanks for this, Mr. Mason, it's an interesting suggestion. Hughes shows Mr. Oswald's head go in and out of that shadow:

You both know it's Lovelady on the steps so give it a rest.

[Alan Ford]

You simply cannot escape the fact that the Lady in Black (#1) is clearly visible in Towner:

~Grin~

This one's up there with mad Mr. Doyle's You cannot escape the fact that Davidson's enhancement shows Sarah Stanton's face.

If the red area in Towner that you have rather bizarrely identified as Lady#1's black [sic.!] arm (despite the fact that she's in short sleeves!) were indeed Lady#1's black arm (despite the fact that she's in short sleeves!), then Bell would be showing what Towner is showing: the fluttering object going directly behind the head of khaki man.

But Bell doesn't show that in the synced frames. As in, at all:



You can keep pushing your geometry-defying hallucination to your heart's content, Mr. O'Meara, but your failure to explain away this simple circumstance means your 'analysis' remains DOA.

P.S. Wiegman does not show Lady#1 in the exact same spot as she's in in Bell/Towner. If it did, then she would show up in Bell very differently: with her face either fully or substantially blocked by khaki man's head. She moved position between Bell/Towner and Wiegman. But nice try! 

[Alan Ford]

You both know it's Lovelady on the steps so give it a rest.

'You're not still doing the Lovelady-On-A-Box routine, are you?'

 

[Zeon Mason]

Ok, I think I agree with Dan on this one because of the amazing coincidence of the waving in both Towner and Bell film relative to the black cowboy hat man in white shirt and pants.

But what’s the red element to the right side of the raised black armed waving flag lady, in the Towner film?

[Alan Ford]

Ok, I think I agree with Dan on this one because of the amazing coincidence of the waving in both Towner and Bell film relative to the black cowboy hat man in white shirt and pants.

What amazing coincidence? Lots of people are waving. It's a Presidential Parade.

The fluttering coming from the hand of the lady in black in Bell is, in the synced frames, at all times clearly east of khaki man's head. Therefore it cannot be what shows up right behind khaki man's head in Towner. A geometric impossibility.

And we see Red Shirt Man (Mr. Oswald) in the same spot he was in in Hughes just a couple of seconds ago, his body now moving in sync with the aggressive downward pumping of the flag:



Now that would be an amazing coincidence!

[Dan O'meara]

What amazing coincidence? Lots of people are waving. It's a Presidential Parade.

The fluttering coming from the hand of the lady in black in Bell is, in the synced frames, at all times clearly east of khaki man's head. Therefore it cannot be what shows up right behind khaki man's head in Towner. A geometric impossibility.

And we see Red Shirt Man (Mr. Oswald) in the same spot he was in in Hughes just a couple of seconds ago, his body now moving in sync with the aggressive downward pumping of the flag:



Now that would be an amazing coincidence!

"The fluttering coming from the hand of the lady in black in Bell is...at all times clearly east of khaki man's head"

[Alan Ford]

"The fluttering coming from the hand of the lady in black in Bell is...at all times clearly east of khaki man's head"

~Grin~

Your sly use of ellipses gives away that you know darn well what the problem is.

Here are the words you excised in quoting me: "in the synced frames"

So! Compare the frame you have just posted with ANY one of the synced frames. See the difference in the position of the Lady#1's hand? That difference right there is why your argument is bust.