Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Alan Ford]

Mr. Roy Edward Lewis (in front of Mr. Oswald) raising his left arm to wave at Pres. Kennedy as he comes onto Elm St.:


[Credit for source GIF: Mr. Jerry Organ]

 

Well!

The double fact that-----------------

a) we now know that Mr. Oswald is back on the fourth step up

b) we can see Mr. Lewis in Hughes raise his left arm to wave at the motorcade

----------------invites us to reconsider just what it is we're seeing in the version of the Altgens photograph shown to the American public by Mr. Walter Cronkite the evening of the assassination:



Could it be that what I have been seeing as Mr. Oswald's raised right arm holding a Coke is in fact Mr. Lewis' raised left arm, and the 'Coke' is part of the flapping object we see in Towner?

[Alan Ford]

Could it be that what I have been seeing as Mr. Oswald's raised right arm holding a Coke is in fact Mr. Lewis' raised left arm, and the 'Coke' is part of the flapping object we see in Towner?

Now!

For many, many years folks have asked the question, 'Where the heck is Lovelady's left shoulder in Altgens???'



Well!

The flapping object in Towner, whatever it is, appears to be two-toned---------darker towards the (our) left and lighter towards the (our) right:



Could BOTH areas marked in red here belong to this flapping object, which the person continued to wave at the Parade even after the limousine had passed?



It would certainly explain the missing Lovelady shoulder!

If this is the correct solution, then the 'investigating' authorities panicked when they saw the original Altgens because they thought it showed Mr. Oswald's Coke bottle................

 

[Alan Ford]

Could BOTH areas marked in red here belong to this flapping object, which the person continued to wave at the Parade even after the limousine had passed?

And the raised arm need not even belong to Mr. Lewis-----------it could simply be the raised RIGHT arm of the person holding and waving the object:



 

[Alan Ford]

Anyone who thinks that

a) the Altgens photograph wasn't monkeyed with------------



b) the ridiculous shadow down Mr. Lovelady's right side in Weigman isn't fake-------------



------------is in serious reality-denial mode!

 

[Tom Scully]

And there we have it. The jealous little narcissist can't generate enough attention with his trademark zero-stakes info dumps, so he comes onto a genuinely important thread and spams it with off-topic self-obsessed garbage. Sad!

You're engaged in a 285 page, "spam thread" a record volume on this forum, a "conversation" primarily with yourself.
Your intent is to maintain this thread as the first page thread with the most recent post.

That is it... the extent, at this point and for several years, of your effort here.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2639.msg93357.html#msg93357

Re: Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )
Alan Ford « Reply #7 on: July 10, 2020,

How are you different than Gerry Campeau in this example? You both shovel BS against the tide, IOW, against the facts... the sincerity behind your individual efforts amounting to no excuse for either of you.

https://jfkfacts.org/rewinding-the-zapruder-film/#comment-843418
GERRY CAMPEAU
DECEMBER 28, 2015 AT 10:46 AM
"Tom S
It’s quit oveous that your news paper story on Col Robert E Jones is cover story to cover up Truth about Col Jones its a charade to think there is more then one Col Robert E Jones at Fort Campbell KY
http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2011/10/26/fort-campbell-held-dedication-for-the-new-col-robert-e-jones-training-support-center/
According to Larry Hancock’s research on the 112th, Jones was lying. He was never the 112th’s operations officer. And the committee didn’t know this? How did Jones know it would be safe to lie about it? And if he lied under oath about something as basic as his own position with the 112th, why should we believe anything else that he said?
 
http://www.maryferre…bsPageId=223377 .."

[Alan Ford]

You're engaged in a 285 page, "spam thread" a record volume on this forum, a "conversation" primarily with yourself.
Your intent is to maintain this thread as the first page thread with the most recent post.

That is it... the extent, at this point and for several years, of your effort here.

~Grin~

Ok, genius. Pick any item of photographic/film evidence at issue in this thread and debate me on it. I'll incinerate you in seconds.

 

[Alan Ford]

Friends, the 'investigating' authorities were freaking out about the fact that Mr. Oswald was in the doorway. If my proposal above re. the flapping object in Altgens is correct, then we can say that this panic led them to make two telltale errors in their alteration of Altgens that would be comical were it not for the ungodly awfulness of what they were doing to the patsy:

1. They mistook Mr. Roy Edward Lewis (the man standing directly in front of Mr. Oswald in Wiegman) for Mr. Carl Edward Jones

2. The mistook part of the flapping object being waved (which we see so graphically in Towner) for Mr. Oswald's Coke bottle.

There was no actual need for them to alter Altgens!

Good people may of course disagree as to the exact interpretation of the Cronkite version of Altgens, which is the only time the unaltered image was shown to the American people. Wherever the truth of what we are seeing there lies, we now know----from comparative analysis of Hughes, Towner, Bell and Wiegman-----that the man in the reddish long-sleeved shirt standing behind Mr. Lewis in the Hughes film is not Mr. Billy Lovelady but Mr. Lee Oswald


[Credit for GIF: Mr. Jerry Organ]