Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Richard Smith]

So, no answer

How expected !

You know the answer.  It is in in the film clip.  This is just contrarian rabbit hole nonsense.  I'll play along, though. Oswald was asked if he shot the president.  He responds that he works in the building.  Then he is asked if he was in the building "at the time." The only "time" being referenced is the shooting.  Oswald responds "naturally" and "yes, sir."  What other "time" would the press be asking him about being in the building under the circumstances?  The only thing they knew about him was that he had been arrested in connection with the crime.   

[John Iacoletti]

So, no answer

How expected !

"Richard" is caught making assumptions yet again.  "At the time" means what "Richard" wants it to mean. No more, no less.

[John Iacoletti]

You know the answer.  It is in in the film clip.  This is just contrarian rabbit hole nonsense.  I'll play along, though. Oswald was asked if he shot the president.  He responds that he works in the building.

 , "Richard".  He's responding to questions asked by somebody else.  "I work in the building" is not an answer to "did you shoot the president?".

[Richard Smith]

What other time would the press be asking Oswald about under the circumstances when they asked him if he was in the building "at the time" while also shouting questions asking if he shot the president?  They knew only one thing about him.  He was the suspect in the assassination.  There is no "assumption" about what is being asked or his answer which is on film.  Unreal kookery.  These are the self-proclaimed "unbiased" arbiters who have no agenda.  This is just more rabbit hole nonsense.  Like when Marina makes dozens of references to the "rifle" or questions about the "rifle" but in one instance refers to seeing the "wooden stock" of "the rifle."  Magically, the object becomes just something made of "wood" in the contrarian fantasy. Which, of course, a rifle is made of.

[Alan Ford]

What other time would the press be asking Oswald about under the circumstances when they asked him if he was in the building "at the time" while also shouting questions asking if he shot the president?  They knew only one thing about him.  He was the suspect in the assassination.  There is no "assumption" about what is being asked or his answer which is on film.  Unreal kookery.  These are the self-proclaimed "unbiased" arbiters who have no agenda.  This is just more rabbit hole nonsense.  Like when Marina makes dozens of references to the "rifle" or questions about the "rifle" but in one instance refers to seeing the "wooden stock" of "the rifle."  Magically, the object becomes just something made of "wood" in the contrarian fantasy. Which, of course, a rifle is made of.

'I still can't explain how Mr. Redshirt in Hughes can be Billy Lovelady, so I'm going to wave my hands around some more'

 

[Richard Smith]

'I still can't explain how Mr. Redshirt in Hughes can be Billy Lovelady, so I'm going to wave my hands around some more'

 

Take it up with Oswald.  He confirmed he was in the building "at the time."

[Alan Ford]

Friends, it is to laugh. The poor Warren Gullibles are having to scramble together their bewildered thoughts about this man whom they are now suddenly having to call "Anybody-But-Lovelady"------------



But while they hunker down in their foxhole, let those of us who are unafraid of the truth go back to the far from tangential question of the black man just in front of Redshirt Man (a.k.a. Mr. Lee Harvey Oswald) in Hughes:



Question!

Why is what we know to be Mr. Carl Edward Jones' cream-colored clothing showing up blue in Hughes?



Answer!

It's showing up blue because it is blue, because he's not Mr. Carl Edward Jones, because he's Mr. Roy Edward Lewis---------with cardigan off!