Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Martin Weidmann]

Oswald was asked if he was in the building at the time.  He responded yes.   There is no ambiguity about this.  Oswald puts himself "in the building".  Not standing outside.  Don't you think under the circumstances if Oswald had been standing outside in the presence of his coworkers - thus providing him with an airtight alibi for murder - that he would be screaming that to anyone who would listen?  Oswald knew that no one could place him outside the building because he was on the 6th floor shooting the president "at that time."  He tried to pawn off his presence in the building as the result of "working there."  Sound familiar?  He didn't work outside the building.  That was the best he could do since he was guilty and had no other option.

Oswald knew that no one could place him outside the building because he was on the 6th floor shooting the president "at that time." 

Another claim for which Richard can not produce a shred of evidence.

[Alan Ford]

I want to further help Mr. Organ by urging folks reading to pay NO attention to the BLACK man in BLUE just in front of Reddish-Shirted Man in Hughes:



At a merely cognitive level we can see that this must be Mr. Roy Edward Lewis. But at a deep metaphysical level we know it cannot be him, for he is at this time behind and up a few steps from Ms. Maddie Reese, wearing a powerful white button. For people to start trusting their cognitive faculties, without understanding either metaphysics or camera systems and processing methods, would be a danger to democracy itself

 

[Alan Ford]

I want to further help Mr. Organ by urging folks reading to pay NO attention to the BLACK man in BLUE just in front of Reddish-Shirted Man in Hughes:



At a merely cognitive level we can see that this must be Mr. Roy Edward Lewis. But at a deep metaphysical level we know it cannot be him, for he is at this time behind and up a few steps from Ms. Maddie Reese, wearing a powerful white button. For people to start trusting their cognitive faculties, without understanding either metaphysics or camera systems and processing methods, would be a danger to democracy itself

 

Given the variety of camera systems and processing methods, not to mention the stupendous bleaching effects of the sun, not to mention our post-cognitive metaphysical intuitions, I'd like to help Mr. Organ out further by offering an alternative solution.

1. The reason this looks just like Mr. Lovelady's shirt/tshirt is that it is in fact Mr. Lovelady's shirt/tshirt. (I know, wild, huh?)



2. Reddish Shirt Man in Hughes is neither Mr. Lovelady nor Mr. Oswald. He is Mr. Roy Edward Lewis:



The man in front of him is wearing a balaclava.

This is obviously a much more satisfactory solution than the identification of Reddish Shirt Man in Hughes as a slender white male wearing a reddish shirt over a white tshirt.

**

Take your pick, Mr. Organ. And---------------you're welcome! 

[Alan Ford]

Friends, let's keep this simple.

The case against Mr. Lee Harvey Oswald as the sixth floor shooter now requires the preposterous scenario that Mr. Roy Edward Lewis rather than Mr. Billy Lovelady is responsible for the upper garments we see here in Bell:




Another way of saying this is that the case against Mr. Oswald as the sixth floor shooter has just completely collapsed.

 

[Alan Ford]

I thought the shirt colors were supposed to match.

 

Mr. Organ, are you actually telling us with a straight face that you rule out this in Bell as Mr. Lovelady's shirt because you're not seeing enough plaid---------



---------but that you're seeing enough plaid here in Hughes to confidently identify this man as Mr. Lovelady?



Please tell me that isn't the very best you've got here.........

 

 

Thanks for comparing one non-foliage element in the background (Mr. Lovelady's white tshirt) with another (the raised forearm of Ms. Maddie Reese):



But please tell me you haven't just confused the white of Ms. Reese's forearm with foliage. Because that would be keeping things too stupid for words................

 

[Alan Ford]

Nice dodge, Mr. Organ! 

I'll ask again: where in the doorway do you believe Mr.-Lewis-in-Bell is?

Bumped for Mr. Organ! 

[Alan Ford]

Friends, let's continue to keep this simple.

The case against Mr. Lee Harvey Oswald as the sixth floor shooter now requires the preposterous double scenario:

a) that Mr. Lovelady's white tshirt, seen peeking out from behind foliage in Bell, is not Mr. Lovelady's white tshirt but in fact foliage:



b) that Mr. Lovelady's shirt, seen at a distance in Bell, cannot be Mr. Lovelady's shirt because it shows up so predominantly red



Another way of saying this is that the case against Mr. Oswald as the sixth floor shooter really has just completely collapsed.