Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Walt Cakebread]

He didn't need to lie Alan because Oswald never did watch the parade.
Can't you see that.
Oswald says as much on film.
There were 7 or 8 other people in the room with Kelley when he asked Oswald if he saw the parade.
Oswald said he never saw the parade in front of all these people.
You can't seriously be saying they were all in on this simple lie.
All 8 interrogators lying about this one little thing.

You're the one making the wild accusations you can never back up.
And what makes you think I'm pro-WC? Just because I think you're FoS?

Dan, Mr Ford is very much like Rob Caprio .....  He gets some wild idea in his head and even after it's proven that the idea is total nonsense and untrue ...he will not back up and listen to reason.....Instead he will accuse anybody who tries to show him the facts, as being supporters of the tale created by the Warren Commission.

[Rick Plant]

Keep in mind that none of the FBI reports or Fritz's report (or even Fritz's notes) were written during the interrogations.

Fritz wrote his notes several days up to a week later when all the important information escaped his mind. 

[Alan Ford]

Dan, Mr Ford is very much like Rob Caprio .....  He gets some wild idea in his head and even after it's proven that the idea is total nonsense and untrue ...he will not back up and listen to reason.....Instead he will accuse anybody who tries to show him the facts, as being supporters of the tale created by the Warren Commission.

I've never accused you of being a WC defender, have I, Mr Cakebread?

The most committed members of Team Keep LHO Away From Them Steps belong to two very different groups
------------------those obsessed with protecting the idea of Mr Oswald's guilt (Mr O'Meara is a member of this group)
------------------those CTs who have spent so many years clinging to the lunchroom story that they react with irrational hostility to anyone who tries to take their comfort blanket away from them (you belong to this group)

 

[Dan O'meara]

I've never accused you of being a WC defender, have I, Mr Cakebread?

The most committed members of Team Keep LHO Away From Them Steps belong to two very different groups
------------------those obsessed with protecting the idea of Mr Oswald's guilt (Mr O'Meara is a member of this group)
------------------those CTs who have spent so many years clinging to the lunchroom story that they react with irrational hostility to anyone who tries to take their comfort blanket away from them (you belong to this group)

 

The idea that your hero is a completely innocent bystander caught up in the assassination reflects a truly disturbed mentality.
This disturbed mentality is revealed when anyone challenges it in any way.
There is zero evidence that Oswald is on the steps. It's not a question of burying or ignoring evidence - there is not one scrap of evidence placing Oswald there.
Not one.
How can you defend that so zealously?

[Alan Ford]

The idea that your hero is a completely innocent bystander caught up in the assassination reflects a truly disturbed mentality.

Quote me saying anything of the sort, Mr O'Meara. You can't, can you?

This disturbed mentality is revealed when anyone challenges it in any way.
There is zero evidence that Oswald is on the steps.

Well, up to a couple of days ago you were loudly proclaiming that there was zero evidence Mr Oswald ever claimed to have been out front for the P. Parade. You're a rookie blowhard, and you make a fool of yourself every time you try to protect the official fairytale! 

[Walt Cakebread]

Fritz wrote his notes several days up to a week later when all the important information escaped his mind.

You are very gullible and naive if you truly believe that Fritz didn't take notes during the interrogation of Lee Oswald.

[Walt Cakebread]

The idea that your hero is a completely innocent bystander caught up in the assassination reflects a truly disturbed mentality.
This disturbed mentality is revealed when anyone challenges it in any way.
There is zero evidence that Oswald is on the steps. It's not a question of burying or ignoring evidence - there is not one scrap of evidence placing Oswald there.
Not one.
How can you defend that so zealously?

The idea that Lee Oswald , a hapless sucker, is a  completely innocent bystander caught up in the assassination reflects a truly disturbed mentality...... and one that is unwilling to accept that his beloved country with it's powerful government leaders could use a goofy sucker like Lee Oswald and then murder him.

Completely innocent bystander??   Yes, that's probably true....He wasn't a completely innocent bystander... But he wasn't guilty of being a willing and knowing accessory or an accomplice.  He allowed himself to be placed in a position where he could be made "the patsy".    He thought that he was a US intel agent whose mission it was to infiltrate Cuba. Just as he had infiltrated the USSR four years earlier.  He was a bit goofy in the fact that he imagined himself to be a budding James Bond. ( or Herb Philbrick)  One only has to examine the "attempt" to kill General Walker to see his dangerously goofy psyche.