Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Alan Ford]

Why highly unlikely???.....    Don't you believe that they would have a patsy ready to be the scapegoat?

If by 'they' you mean the assassination conspirators rather than the post-hoc 'investigators', then the evidence is they made no effort to set Mr Oswald up as a gunman, let alone a lone nut gunman. That was the impossible job of the 'investigation'. Which is why the Warren Report is such a joke!

[Walt Cakebread]

If by 'they' you mean the assassination conspirators rather than the post-hoc 'investigators', then the evidence is they made no effort to set Mr Oswald up as a gunman, let alone a lone nut gunman. That was the impossible job of the 'investigation'. Which is why the Warren Report is such a joke!

If by 'they' you mean the assassination conspirators rather than the post-hoc 'investigators',

"Conspirators" ----- "Investigators"    Is there a difference?      Some men wore both hats.....

[Alan Ford]

If by 'they' you mean the assassination conspirators rather than the post-hoc 'investigators',

"Conspirators" ----- "Investigators"    Is there a difference?      Some men wore both hats.....

As usual, Mr Cakebread, you start with a conclusion and take it merrily from there

[Dan O'meara]

If by 'they' you mean the assassination conspirators rather than the post-hoc 'investigators',

"Conspirators" ----- "Investigators"    Is there a difference?      Some men wore both hats.....

Other than Fritz, I can't really see anyone else who fits the bill.

[Walt Cakebread]

Other than Fritz, I can't really see anyone else who fits the bill.

Well one in a key position is enough ....But have you ever checked out Gerald Hill?

[Dan O'meara]

Well one in a key position is enough ....But have you ever checked out Gerald Hill?

My definition of "conspirator" is someone who knew what was going to happen that day,
Hill doesn't fit the bill for that.
But you are quite correct, one in a key position is enough.

[Donald Roberdeau]

I think someone needs to be getting in touch with Mr Roberdeau.

 .... Good Day Dan.... Perhaps someone was mis-identifying that the "Thornton" road sign on an 11-22-63 map was the "Stemmons" road sign. The closest edge of the "Thornton" sign, to the westernmost side of the TSBD front door entrance steps, was a bit over 126 feet, = 42 yards. (Elm Street was nearly exactly 40' wide)

Best Regards in Research, Don

[Dan O'meara]

.... Good Day Dan.... Perhaps someone was mis-identifying that the "Thornton" road sign on an 11-22-63 map was the "Stemmons" road sign. The closest edge of the "Thornton" sign, to the westernmost side of the TSBD front door entrance steps, was a bit over 126 feet, = 42 yards. (Elm Street was nearly exactly 40' wide)

Best Regards in Research, Don

Hi Don,

This was from quite a while ago.
As I remember I had a couple of schematic drawings of Dealey Plaza that agreed with each other in the scale they were using but disagreed with your map.
If I remember correctly it turned out these schematic drawings were wrong and your map was right.

Is there a latest update for your map and, out of interest, do you agree with the identification of the four ladies standing together wearing head scarves as Calvery, Hicks, Reed and Westbrook?