Those Front Steps

[John Mytton]

Context for this latest Mytton Foray Into The Twilight Zone!

Mr Mytton has watched Mr Mitcham do what he himself knew better than to do---------------------namely, commit to actually putting Mr Lovelady on the vertical shadow line somewhere on the steps:



'Hmmmm,' said Mr Mytton to himself, still smarting from the total collapse of his center railing scam, 'that way fresh hell lies... No deuced way around the Lovelady-blocking-Prayer-Person problem if we put Lovelady anywhere on the steps'.

So! He takes a look at that shadow line (which he daren't query btw) and realises there's only one last scam left to try:

Put Mr Lovelady way back on the landing just in front of the door!



He knows it's a deranged idea, even by Mytton standards, but it just might fool the fools! 

Problem!

Mr Lovelady clearly steps downwards and forwards between the early and the later Lovelady-In-Wiegman frames:



The idea that Mr Lovelady @ lower elevation is way back on the landing, just in front of the door, is so patently absurd it must make even Mr Mytton blanch as he tries to screw his courage to the sticking place to launch his latest scam! But on he ploughs, doughty conman that he is...

Mytton Solution!

Gaslight people with the idea that "the Lovelady stepping down is a red herring"!  Suggest Mr Lovelady might be leaning forward to tie his shoelaces!  Claim that "total amount of frames of Lovelady is about half a second and is just a flash in time"! 

That sound you hear, friends, is the sound of a desperate Lone Nut scam artist scraping the bottom of a barrel that has become terrifyingly empty...

Of course, this latest scam is not going to go any better for Mr Mytton than his recent ones! 

Where to start?

How about here:

Mr Mytton cannot get away from the gap Wiegman shows from Mr Lovelady's head to the metal door frame:



Mr Hackerott--------whose meticulous 3D calcuations Mr Mytton daren't take on----------has already shown that this gap puts Mr Lovelady out at the edge of the landing:



The only solution for Mr Mytton here would be to make a new 'Educated Guess' and put Mr Lovelady further west back there in order to create fictional sidelong distance between Mr Lovelady and the frame. But that won't work because too much of Mr Lovelady's body would then be eaten up by shadow!



Poor Mr Mytton!

Alternatively, we could start here:

Mr Mytton has forgotten to factor in the horizontal lintel shadow!



He can't put Mr Lovelady back there and have his full face in direct sunlight! 

Or here:

Mr Mytton has forgotten to factor in Mr Frazier in Wiegman!  



Perhaps Mr Mytton can make a second 'Educated Guess', this time as to the respective positions of Messrs Lovelady and Frazier--------------and test his two 'Educated Guesses' against the respective heights of those two gentlemen?



Once Mr Mytton has addressed the above------------each of which is a deal-breaker on its own-------------we can talk about something else Mr Mytton has forgotten to factor in:



Get out the popcorn, friends!

Whenever you get flustered and unable to defend yourself the posts get longer and longer and longer, as if repeating the same uneducated words over and over is going to save you.
My sun plane evidence has not been refuted.
My 3D GIF places Lovelady no where near the railing.
My Lovelady "step down" GIF proves that Lovelady wasn't stepping down and was in fact leaning foward.

Unless Ford can explain how his "painting in a shadow" was done and how, then we're only left with scientific evidence and that will win every time.

Btw you presented a graphic with Oswald's head still behind Lovelady which kinda makes your own theory null and void, where can this very entertaining fantasy possibly go from here? I love it when you people attempt to create convulted solutions for problems that you yourselves invent.

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

Whenever you get flustered and unable to defend yourself the posts get longer and longer and longer, as if repeating the same uneducated words over and over is going to save you.
My sun plane evidence has not been refuted.
My 3D GIF places Lovelady no where near the railing.
My Lovelady "step down" GIF proves that Lovelady wasn't stepping down and was in fact leaning foward.

Unless Ford can explain how his "painting in a shadow" was done and how, then we're only left with scientific evidence and that will win every time.

Btw you presented a graphic with Oswald's head still behind Lovelady which kinda makes your own theory null and void, where can this very entertaining fantasy possibly go from here? I love it when you people attempt to create convulted solutions for problems that you yourselves invent.

JohnM

    That "Lovelady Step Down" GIF is an absolute joke. There is No Way somebody could be Leaning Forward from the waist/semi bowing and have their shirt flap Toward  Them/Their Chest. Whatever you have Constructed defies Gravity. If Lovelady were Leaning Forward at the waist, that shirt would be Flapping Away from him toward the ground. Whatever Lovelady might be doing he is NOT bending Forward at the waist in a semi bow.

[John Mytton]

    That "Lovelady Step Down" GIF is an absolute joke. There is No Way somebody could be Leaning Forward from the waist/semi bowing and have their shirt flap Toward  Them/Their Chest. Whatever you have Constructed defies Gravity. If Lovelady were Leaning Forward at the waist, that shirt would be Flapping Away from him toward the ground. Whatever Lovelady might be doing he is NOT bending Forward at the waist in a semi bow.

Your biased "cheerleader level" opinion has always been an absolute joke, so i win. Try again.
Btw EVERY kooky CT fakery theory that comes along you blindly embrace and every Technical refuation from a LNer is "an absolute joke", not just once but every single time and you wonder why the Forum treats you like a clown.

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

Your biased "cheerleader level" opinion has always been an absolute joke, so i win. Try again.
Btw EVERY kooky CT fakery theory that comes along you blindly embrace and every Technical refuation from a LNer is "an absolute joke", not just once but every single time and you wonder why the Forum treats you like a clown.

JohnM

   So explain how the Lovelady Shirt Flap DEFIES Gravity as seen in your GIF?

[John Mytton]

   So explain how the Lovelady Shirt Flap DEFIES Gravity as seen in your GIF?

What, the shirt flap that LOSES the shadow, where do YOU think the shadow went?

JohnM

[Royell Storing]

What, the shirt flap that LOSES the shadow, where do YOU think the shadow went?

JohnM

   Forget the shadow. Explain Why that Flap is defying Gravity?

[John Mytton]

   Forget the shadow.

Sorry, I can understand your reluctance but the whole point of this debate are the shadows on Lovelady and asking to forget this shadow only emphasizes your incompetence.
So lets try again shall we, what happened to the shadow under Lovelady's left lapel?

JohnM