Those Front Steps

[Thomas Graves]

Who’s “we”? You haven’t proven jack.

John,

"Baby with the bathwater," STILL?

How ... gasp ... irrational!

--  MWT 

[Paul May]

   I'll take Sworn Testimony vs Your Reliance on the morphing memory of "Fuzzy" Frazier 50+ years after the assassination.

So, you claim you’ll accept sworn testimony. Interesting. How about the sworn testimony in 1973 U.S. Government versus Fred Trump, father and Donald Trump, son and Trump Management, Inc. in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Charge: Racial discrimination in renting practices to minority Americans. The Trumps were defended by mob lawyer and Trump confidante Roy Cohn. The case was settled two years later after Trump, in typical fashion tried to counter sue the Justice Dept for $100 million for making false statements. Those allegations were dismissed by the court. The case was ultimately settled when Trump management agreed to run ads in NY newspapers welcoming blacks and other minorities. Like to hear the sworn testimony of witnesses against YOUR racist POS POTUS? It’s sworn testimony which you prefer, right genius?

[Paul May]

Storing, running away again. That’s is lack of character. Again.

[Paul May]

So, you claim you’ll accept sworn testimony. Interesting. How about the sworn testimony in 1973 U.S. Government versus Fred Trump, father and Donald Trump, son and Trump Management, Inc. in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Charge: Racial discrimination in renting practices to minority Americans. The Trumps were defended by mob lawyer and Trump confidante Roy Cohn. The case was settled two years later after Trump, in typical fashion tried to counter sue the Justice Dept for $100 million for making false statements. Those allegations were dismissed by the court. The case was ultimately settled when Trump management agreed to run ads in NY newspapers welcoming blacks and other minorities. Like to hear the sworn testimony of witnesses against YOUR racist POS POTUS? It’s sworn testimony which you prefer, right genius?

bump

[Royell Storing]

  So let's see Your Proof regarding those 2 guys moving Up the Elm Ext being Lovelady & Shelley. Waiting.............................

[Paul May]

So, you claim you’ll accept sworn testimony. Interesting. How about the sworn testimony in 1973 U.S. Government versus Fred Trump, father and Donald Trump, son and Trump Management, Inc. in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Charge: Racial discrimination in renting practices to minority Americans. The Trumps were defended by mob lawyer and Trump confidante Roy Cohn. The case was settled two years later after Trump, in typical fashion tried to counter sue the Justice Dept for $100 million for making false statements. Those allegations were dismissed by the court. The case was ultimately settled when Trump management agreed to run ads in NY newspapers welcoming blacks and other minorities. Like to hear the sworn testimony of witnesses against YOUR racist POS POTUS? It’s sworn testimony which you prefer, right genius?

Running again from your own comment? You have as much credibility as Trump. Is that even possible?

[Royell Storing]

  Ask for Proof and what do I get?  NOTHING!