Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 407486 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #532 on: November 22, 2019, 09:36:47 PM »
    Exactly what is "nasty" about wanting you to be permitted to continue shooting yourself in the foot?

Support you claim, what number?



JohnM


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #533 on: November 22, 2019, 09:42:12 PM »
:D :D :D

No, it's Mr Hackerott's claim, which you have already stated you don't disagree with!


Sorry, but why do I have to prove your claim, that's nuts!

First prove that the shadow recreation shows an accurate shadow because if it doesn't then your theory ceases to be?
Second we will work on your "paint" theory?
Third we will discuss the railing?

JohnM

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #534 on: November 22, 2019, 09:44:30 PM »
Sorry, but why do I have to prove your claim, that's nuts!

 :D :D :D

Do you disagree with where Mr Hackerott has put the shadow line in Wiegman, Mr Mytton?



 Thumb1:

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #535 on: November 22, 2019, 09:47:33 PM »
:D :D :D

Do you disagree with where Mr Hackerott has put the shadow line in Wiegman, Mr Mytton?



 Thumb1:

 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

How would I know without your proof?

 Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1:

JohnM

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #536 on: November 22, 2019, 09:55:46 PM »
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

How would I know without your proof?

 Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1:

JohnM

Friends, I'm actually beginning to nearly feel a little sorry for poor Mr Mytton here. It can't be easy for him being exposed in real time as a scam artist in front of so many people. And to have his loudly trumpeted claim about the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady being a natural shadow collapse in such spectacular fashion must be traumatic indeed!  :D

Now Mr Mytton, I know you suddenly really really really don't want to talk about the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady you were so terribly interested in just a page or two back, and I understand how bruising the past couple of days have been for you. But... you have to see this thing through like a big boy, OK?  Thumb1:

So!

Do you disagree with where Mr Hackerott has put the shadow line in Wiegman?



 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: November 22, 2019, 09:56:31 PM by Alan Ford »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #537 on: November 22, 2019, 10:00:59 PM »

Do you disagree with where Mr Hackerott has put the shadow line in Wiegman?



 Thumb1:

Asking the same question over and over again won't solve your problem, prove that the graphic's shadow is where it was at 12:30 on the 22nd of November 1963, then and only then do I give you permission to move on.
Btw STOP asking me to prove your claim, it doesn't work like that, do your own work, you lazy sob.

JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #538 on: November 22, 2019, 10:02:56 PM »
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

How would I know without your proof?

 Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1:

JohnM

    JOHN - Focus on the Positive. You have made Alan Ford the forum Image Expert. Congrats