Those Front Steps

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 348752 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5127
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #532 on: November 22, 2019, 09:33:15 PM »
So you agree that this is indeed the shadow line in the entranceway?

Blah blah blah


It's your claim, prove it with the actual Depository shadow and then we can move on?

JohnM


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #533 on: November 22, 2019, 09:36:05 PM »
It's your claim, prove it with the actual Depository shadow and then we can move on?

JohnM

 :D :D :D

No, it's Mr Hackerott's claim, which you have already stated you don't disagree with!

So! Let's try again, shall we?

Show us, using Mr Hackerott's reconstruction---------which includes what we both agree is the correct shadow line!---------where you believe Mr Lovelady is in this Wiegman frame:



A simple 'X' will do!



(But remember: you can't put him on the landing for this Wiegman frame, otherwise he would have to have been levitating in the earlier frames!)

Good luck, Mr Mytton!  Thumb1:

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5127
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #534 on: November 22, 2019, 09:36:47 PM »
    Exactly what is "nasty" about wanting you to be permitted to continue shooting yourself in the foot?

Support you claim, what number?



JohnM


Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5127
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #535 on: November 22, 2019, 09:42:12 PM »
:D :D :D

No, it's Mr Hackerott's claim, which you have already stated you don't disagree with!


Sorry, but why do I have to prove your claim, that's nuts!

First prove that the shadow recreation shows an accurate shadow because if it doesn't then your theory ceases to be?
Second we will work on your "paint" theory?
Third we will discuss the railing?

JohnM

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #536 on: November 22, 2019, 09:44:30 PM »
Sorry, but why do I have to prove your claim, that's nuts!

 :D :D :D

Do you disagree with where Mr Hackerott has put the shadow line in Wiegman, Mr Mytton?



 Thumb1:

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5127
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #537 on: November 22, 2019, 09:47:33 PM »
:D :D :D

Do you disagree with where Mr Hackerott has put the shadow line in Wiegman, Mr Mytton?



 Thumb1:

 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

How would I know without your proof?

 Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1:

JohnM

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #538 on: November 22, 2019, 09:55:46 PM »
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

How would I know without your proof?

 Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1: Thumb1:

JohnM

Friends, I'm actually beginning to nearly feel a little sorry for poor Mr Mytton here. It can't be easy for him being exposed in real time as a scam artist in front of so many people. And to have his loudly trumpeted claim about the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady being a natural shadow collapse in such spectacular fashion must be traumatic indeed!  :D

Now Mr Mytton, I know you suddenly really really really don't want to talk about the dark vertical strip down Mr Lovelady you were so terribly interested in just a page or two back, and I understand how bruising the past couple of days have been for you. But... you have to see this thing through like a big boy, OK?  Thumb1:

So!

Do you disagree with where Mr Hackerott has put the shadow line in Wiegman?



 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: November 22, 2019, 09:56:31 PM by Alan Ford »