Those Front Steps

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 348821 times)

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #518 on: November 22, 2019, 09:46:19 AM »
The lady in the black top appears twice in the above gif. Look at the version of her on the left: it's her in Wiegman and she too is standing east of the center railing in Wiegman, yet Mr Mytton has that railing way over to the east of her. All because of his scam artist desire to add fictional distance between that center railing and Mr Lovelady. Too funny!  :D

Just how dense are you, I already spelled out why you perceive a problem. The following two dimensional comparison shows that the lady in black is to the West and to the East of the door frame and when I made the GIF I could either match up the PERMANENT architecture or rely on a woman who could have MOVED so the answer is easy, you stick with what is PERMANENT and this comparison to Lovelady was the entire point of the exercise. The only way to match the lady in black is to ignore the architecture which as explained above is worthless.



Anyway, this three dimensional GIF has the top of the railing at about 4 or 5 and guess what, Lovelady is all the way back there in the shadow, which makes sense and matches the 3D computer recreations and doesn't rely on some extensive touch up work, which somehow spilt onto Lovelady to hide Oswald who was standing behind, how stoopid.



Finish what you started, what number?



JohnM

« Last Edit: November 22, 2019, 10:47:35 AM by John Mytton »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #519 on: November 22, 2019, 04:30:46 PM »
Just how dense are you, I already spelled out why you perceive a problem. The following two dimensional comparison shows that the lady in black is to the West and to the East of the door frame and when I made the GIF I could either match up the PERMANENT architecture or rely on a woman who could have MOVED so the answer is easy, you stick with what is PERMANENT and this comparison to Lovelady was the entire point of the exercise. The only way to match the lady in black is to ignore the architecture which as explained above is worthless.



Anyway, this three dimensional GIF has the top of the railing at about 4 or 5 and guess what, Lovelady is all the way back there in the shadow, which makes sense and matches the 3D computer recreations and doesn't rely on some extensive touch up work, which somehow spilt onto Lovelady to hide Oswald who was standing behind, how stoopid.



Finish what you started, what number?



JohnM

    You used to absolutely rag Paul Ernst for drawing Lines and Squiggles on his visual aids and here You are Now doing the same.  STOP with your Guess work and the Etch-A-Sketch debauchery.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #520 on: November 22, 2019, 04:37:37 PM »
That’s nothing new. “Mytton” has been doing “proof” by squiggle for a long time. Remember his yellow squiggles on the backyard photo?

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #521 on: November 22, 2019, 04:44:54 PM »
    You used to absolutely rag Paul Ernst for drawing Lines and Squiggles on his visual aids and here You are Now doing the same.  STOP with your Guess work and the Etch-A-Sketch debauchery.

Sorry, you said that my railing was the wrong length but its now obvious you never had a clue, why am I not surprised.

JohnM

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #522 on: November 22, 2019, 04:46:07 PM »
Remember his yellow squiggles on the backyard photo?

Thanks for remembering my posts, i'm flattered.

JohnM

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5015
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #523 on: November 22, 2019, 04:57:41 PM »
That’s nothing new. “Mytton” has been doing “proof” by squiggle for a long time. Remember his yellow squiggles on the backyard photo?

     The Importance of Contrasting film footage focusing on the TSBD Steps is that it is Obvious that there is a serious Time Gap between the films. The People we see standing on the steps/landing is a changing cast of characters and/or radical position alterations. We have always been led to believe eyewitnesses were Stunned in place or meandering within their current space. Throw in the fact this was a Friday = the employees of the TSBD being in No Hurry to hussle back inside the building. The ever changing personnel we see on the TSBD Steps in Wiegman vs Darnell/Couch makes this time gap between the films crystal clear. The false narrative of these films capturing images at close to the same point in time is also the primary reason for roughly 40 years that we were fed the baloney that Wiegman ran his camera Continuously. The intentional FALSE Time Stamping of films, photos, and the images captured therein continues dogging this case.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2019, 05:01:27 PM by Royell Storing »

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5129
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #524 on: November 22, 2019, 05:14:52 PM »
     The Importance of Contrasting film footage focusing on the TSBD Steps is that it is Obvious that there is a serious Time Gap between the films. The People we see standing on the steps/landing is a changing cast of characters and/or radical position alterations. We have always been led to believe eyewitnesses were Stunned in place or meandering within their current space. Throw in the fact this was a Friday = the employees of the TSBD being in No Hurry to hussle back inside the building. The ever changing personnel we see on the TSBD Steps in Wiegman vs Darnell/Couch makes this time gap between the films crystal clear. The false narrative of these films capturing images at close to the same point in time is also the primary reason for roughly 40 years that we were fed the baloney that Wiegman ran his camera Continuously. The intentional FALSE Time Stamping of films, photos, and the images captured therein continues dogging this case.

Instead of this constant bitching, how about YOU fix the timeline of the visual record. Make a thread and enlighten us.

JohnM