Nice trolling, danny Boy o'meara.
High praise indeed from this forum's #1 troll
If Lovelady and Shelley lied about their movements, who made them do it?
The evil, evil "sham" Warren Commission, the evil, evil CIA, or the evil, evil [fill in the blank]?
I don't understand the question.
Why do you think they were "made" to do it?
Why don't
you explain why they lied about their movements after the assassination?
All I've done is demonstrate, beyond any reasonable doubt, that they did indeed lie about their movements after the assassination.
The only possible reason they had for doing this (as far as I can see) is to cover up the fact that immediately after the assassination both men made their way toward the back of the first floor where they were seen by Adams and Baker seconds after the assassination.
The question then becomes - why would they want to cover up their presence near the first floor elevators about 60 seconds after the assassination?
Regaardless, do you still think the balding guy who's pivoting out of Baker's way about 25 seconds after the final shot in Darnell is William Shelley?
I'm not like you, thomas. I don't change my opinion just to try and 'score a point'. My opinion is based on, what I regard to be, the most reasonable interpretation of the evidence.
At no point have I changed my mind about the identification of Shelley in Darnell. It fits perfectly with the identification of Lovelady on the steps.
Your ability to see bald spots and receding hairlines in such poor images is as laughable as everything else you've offered up in this thread. Almost every single piece of evidence related to this aspect of the case points away from your 'it looks like Lovelady to me' approach to the evidence. But here you are, still trollin' along
