Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 405482 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5681
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #833 on: December 05, 2019, 12:25:03 AM »
Thanks for the higher res graphic.
1, The shadow is not Jet Black.
2. The shadow line is not a curtain.
3. The shadow naturally follows Lovelady's shirt.
4. The detail and associated highlighting in the entire shadow is consistent with Lovelady's shadow.
5. The level of artistry on display in the photo realistic Lovelady shadow is really a sight to behold and to think they did this not once but a dozen times with jerky, motion blurred, hand held film? Far out man, far out!



JohnM

     (1) You claim we are Not seeing a Curtain, and then manage to enclose it inside a Box. Thank you. (2) You claim the Curtain is Not Jet Black. What in that pic is darker than this Jet Black Curtain? Thanks again.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2019, 12:26:05 AM by Royell Storing »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2137
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #834 on: December 05, 2019, 01:46:58 AM »
Happy to, Mr Nickerson!

Mr Lee Harvey Oswald was standing just behind Mr Billy Lovelady at the time of the assassination:



 Thumb1:

WOW! There he is. Our man Oswald. Smirk and all. You da man Al.  Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #835 on: December 05, 2019, 02:16:03 AM »
No worries, I have already stated on numerous occasions that the landing is deeper today

 :D :D :D

Here's what actually happened, Mr Mytton. It's a real hoot!

1. I posted this photo from Mr Pat Speer:



2. You, rubbing your hands in glee as you saw the shadow reaching almost the perfect midpoint of the doorway, posted this claim that all my claims were refuted by what you had noticed:



3. I gently pointed out to you that the landing depth today is different to the landing depth in 1963, and you came back with this:





So the landing was "a little deeper", "a bit deeper (from memory a couple of feet) in 2019", was it?

Let's look at the facts, shall we?  Thumb1:

Depth of landing in 1963: less than 4 feet



(Credit: Mr Gary Murr!  Thumb1: )

Depth of landing now: 9 feet.



The landing has been extended to well over twice its original depth!

This is what you call "a little deeper"!

Keep up the good work, Mr Mytton!  :D
« Last Edit: December 05, 2019, 02:42:04 AM by Alan Ford »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #836 on: December 05, 2019, 02:22:15 AM »
The right hand line of the shadow exactly follows the right hand line in the original photo.
Please point out where I added fake shadow ..outside (i.e to the right of) the line of the shadow of the west Column.

P.U.O.S U

Kindly stop with this nonsense, Mr Mitcham!


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #837 on: December 05, 2019, 02:27:14 AM »
Thanks for the higher res graphic.
1, The shadow is not Jet Black.
2. The shadow line is not a curtain.
3. The shadow naturally follows Lovelady's shirt.
4. The detail and associated highlighting in the entire shadow is consistent with Lovelady's shadow.
5. The level of artistry on display in the photo realistic Lovelady shadow is really a sight to behold and to think they did this not once but a dozen times with jerky, motion blurred, hand held film? Far out man, far out!



JohnM

 :D

The scam was to make people think this was a natural shadow. But it can't be a natural shadow, because there ain't no shadow there. Each and every one of your increasingly frantic attempts to place Mr Lovelady somewhere the natural shadow line actually was, Mr Mytton, has come an absolute cropper. Sorry!  Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #838 on: December 05, 2019, 02:38:09 AM »
Now!

It has been claimed that, if the Wiegman film was doctored to put Mr Lovelady in 'shadow', then the timeline for this would have been impossibly tight. The only evidence put forward for this claim has been an NBC TV broadcast from 1988 which purported to show the 'original' footage from Wiegman that went out to the American public on the afternoon of the assassination!  :D

Here's what the late Mr Gary Mack told Mr Darren Hastings in March 2015 (emphases added):

NBC owns the original Wiegman film but when producers of JFK: Death in Dealey Plaza asked them for it 12 years ago (at my request), NBC could only locate a 1960s-era video tape of it. We wound up using, I think, a 1963/1964 theatrical newsreel version held by UCLA.
NBC took the original Wiegman and Darnell films from the Dallas NBC affiliate to New York following the assassination weekend.


So much for 'they only had a couple of hours to do this'!  Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #839 on: December 05, 2019, 02:40:10 AM »
WOW! There he is. Our man Oswald. Smirk and all. You da man Al.  Thumb1:

Do let us know if you wish to offer anything substantial by way of challenging this exoneration of Mr Oswald, Mr Nickerson. So far your pal Mr Mytton has gotten absolutely nowhere!  Thumb1: