Amazing. Exactly the long winded response one would expect from John Mytton. Go figure that the two of you are so alike. Same writing style, the same stupid laughing about your own remarks. You really could be twins.... But you really aren't, are you now, Johnny?
Yeah, yeah!
I think we're probably more laughing at you than at our own remarks.
You sound quite irked though, Weidmann. Anyone would think you'd been caught doing something really pathetic and foolish on a forum by the way you're acting
Wiedmann: "I figured it some time ago..." it's just you only decided to mention it for the first time after it came to light that you and Otto are the same person?
First of all, nothing of that kind ever "came to light". You just made it up. And the message I posted by Peter Goth was from a PM he wrote me, which should tell you that back in 2019 we had already figured out who Vincent Baxter really was.
So you even PM yourself from these fake accounts too? This is bonkers!
The reason that I did not mention it is a simple one.
Was it because you only thought of it after it came to light that you were using multiple accounts to back your arguments?
It would play straight into John Mytton's hands because he would use it as another diversion. And besides, I couldn't care less. I already knew what to expect from Mytton is this most certainly wasn't beyond him. For years now he has been accussing people of being somebody else. This would be just another one of those pointless discussions.
Ermm, yeah. That makes perfect sense. How would Mytton have used it as a diversion? A diversion from what?
by being exposed as someone who created an alter-ego solely to back him up in forum debates.
Care to back up that accusation?
Do I get the offer of $100,000 too?
I can tell you now that apart from me occasionally applauding Mytton's comments in private from behind my computer screen, there has been very little onscreen interaction between us. Therefore making the notion that we're the same person pretty invalid.
Another typical "Mytton" remark. Boy it's scary just how much the two of you are alike.
If by a "typical 'Mytton' remark" you're referring to me stating that Mytton and I have barely interacted on this forum before then I can I just point out that telling the truth and alerting people to facts isn't exactly a unique trait possessed only by John Mytton, quite a few other people do that too so it's not exactly a killer blow.
Where was Mytton, or any other LNer on this forum, to join in and back me up during those discussions, eh?
Wrong argument. I said that whenever Mytton disappears for a while some other character pops up, with a similar writing style and the same old BS arguments as him. That's exactly what happened here!
And the purpose of doing this being?
What I do find interesting here is how you replied to everything else in my post but chose, not only to ignore, but completely delete the section I wrote about Otto Beck being the only other forum member who commented on the long winded and massively off topic thread we were both discussing a month or so back. The subject matter was so far removed from the original subject topic of reliable witnesses and each of our posts was of considerable length that even I was getting bored with the discussion.
However, Otto Beck seemed to take great interest in the subject and in reading the lengthy posts that weren't relevant or of interest to any other independent member of the forum and frequently posted comments backing up your side of the argument.
Strange that isn't it?
