Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

Author Topic: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer  (Read 921962 times)

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #656 on: June 18, 2018, 02:45:35 AM »
Advertisement
What are you looking for Matt?

 It sounds like the reports of four or six addresses of the location caused confusion Wouldn't a call from the officers car take some precedent over the others and clear up the situation?
« Last Edit: June 18, 2018, 02:55:29 AM by Matt Grantham »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #656 on: June 18, 2018, 02:45:35 AM »


Offline Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #657 on: June 18, 2018, 02:52:40 AM »
So the fact that the shells in evidence CANNOT be shown to have been found at the crime scene doesn't bother you at all. This says all that we need to know about you.

If the shells were switched, why would the switcher throw them in the front yard of a house further down the street? You could hardly throw them that far when standing in the spot where Tippet's killer fired. It doesn't make sense that the shells were picked up (every last one of them) and furled down the street away from the scene. Anyone who believes that has lost the plot.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #658 on: June 18, 2018, 02:55:58 AM »
Martin, I pointed out that evidence is not admitted into court without first being authenticated.

Nope, that?s what you turned it into later. You began by basically claiming that the admittance of a piece of evidence somehow automatically certifies it?s probative value to such an extend that the defense could do nothing more about it. And that is simply not true.

Quote from: Tim Nickerson on June 17, 2018, 04:38:09 AM
Evidence is not admitted into court without first being authenticated.

Quote from: Martin Weidmann on June 17, 2018, 05:14:35 AM
No... this comment alone shows that you have no idea how the admittance of evidence works..



Quote
Having OJ try the gloves on was not the Defense challenging the chain of custody.

I never said anything about OJ trying on the gloves. And the defense did in fact challenge the chain of custody when they questioned the credibility of Mark Furman who claimed to have found one of the gloves behind OJ?s house.

Provide the transcript that has them challenging the chain of custody of the gloves.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #658 on: June 18, 2018, 02:55:58 AM »


Offline Michael Chambers

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #659 on: June 18, 2018, 02:59:54 AM »
I don't recall him having a little box on the screen. Whatever it was , it was not the actual original Police radio broadcast tape.


Whatever it was , it was not the actual original Police radio broadcast tape.


Why not?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #660 on: June 18, 2018, 03:07:04 AM »

Whatever it was , it was not the actual original Police radio broadcast tape.

Why not?

How would Herbert Blenner have been permitted to obtain and hold the actual original Police radio dictabelt? Think about that.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #660 on: June 18, 2018, 03:07:04 AM »


Offline Michael Chambers

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #661 on: June 18, 2018, 03:10:07 AM »
How would Herbert Blenner have been permitted to obtain and hold the actual original Police radio dictabelt? Think about that.

Well Ok but I only meant a copy of the original.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #662 on: June 18, 2018, 03:13:02 AM »
Well Ok but I only meant a copy of the original.

 Thumb1:

Offline Michael Chambers

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #663 on: June 18, 2018, 03:21:12 AM »
Anyone familiar with the evidence in the case (the addresses relevant to the witnesses) would understand perfectly why there were different addresses.

For example, L.J. Lewis, Pat Patterson, Harold Russell and Warren Reynolds were at the Reynolds Motor Company when they heard the shots.  They looked up Patton towards the sound of the shots and saw a man running down Patton (towards them) with a gun in his hands.  Harold Russell went up to Tenth Street.  Warren Reynolds and Pat Patterson followed the killer.  However, Lewis went inside the offices of the car lot and called the police.  The address of the car lot, where Lewis was calling from, was 510 E. Jefferson Boulevard.

510 E. Jefferson Blvd. was one of the addresses mentioned in the police tapes.

ALSO Tim I found this from Herberts posting on another forum.
Herbert Blenner
Advanced Member
Members
 52 posts

"See the following link for the audio segment used in this article.
 
http://hdblenner.com/temps/tippit.wav
 
The transcripts of radio traffic on Channel-I and an audio file reportedly originating from the dictabelt show that the authorities altered the sequence of recorded events surrounding the murder of Officer Tippit."
 
Part One - Activity on the Primary Police Channel-I
 
When police initially arrived at the scene of the Tippit shooting, the dictabelt had recorded six addresses for the location of the crime scene. This situation is particularly difficult to dismiss since a citizen reported the shooting to the police over the two-way radio of Tippit?s patrol car.

Herb used to make a lot of oddball claims. That the dictabelt recorded numerous different addresses for the location of the crime scene doesn't mean that it was altered in any way. It just shows that there was a lot of confusion at the time.

And just to clarify further in relation to Bill and Tims point of the 6 addresses - neither me or Herbert is saying that meant in itself that the authorities altered the sequence of recorded events surrounding the murder of Officer Tippit."


But that the times on of all concerned don't match meaning mainly the police and ambulance documented data is falsified.

If anyone is interested the tag of that whole Herbert Blenner posting is -
http://forum.assassinationofjfk.net/index.php/topic/810-hello-police-operator/

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #663 on: June 18, 2018, 03:21:12 AM »