I understand the HOW but not the WHY

[Michael Capasse]

"...I scored in the 99.7th percentile on the Law School Admissions Test, and I graduated from law school magna cum laude, law review, Order of the Coif, blah blah blah. Ditto for college - magna cum laude, Phi Kappa Phi, blah blah blah. Insofar as my law school credentials go, they are a matter of public record. I have no false humility about my analytical abilities.

  Yet, you only have to prove Lee Oswald killed John Kennedy.

[John Iacoletti]

At the risk of being accused of strutting my stuff

And then he proceeds to do exactly that. 

Am I supremely knowledgeable about the JFKA? Hell, no.

Thanks for the admission.  So you're just here to troll the forum with your ridiculous and tedious "please explain why" challenges.

Do I know how to fix the transmission in my car? Hell, no. But I do know how to think clearly and rationally and am able to recognize those who don't. My posts here are worth whatever others think they are worth, nothing more and nothing less.

Which isn't much.  Do you also go on auto mechanic forums and brag out your IQ there?

If this were my forum, people like you would be gone.

Sure, because that's a lot easier than bothering to learn anything or to respond to anything with facts and evidence.