The Miracle On Elm Street

[Jack Nessan]

Just to have it clearly on the record, Jack - Do you believe Rowland invented seeing a man with a rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building?
It's a yes/no thing.

It is clearly on the record. You are trying to weasel word your way out of explaining Rowlands testimony. How about you man up and relate his sighting to reality. Here is BRW's answer on someone else up there to the west.

Mr. WILLIAMS. Yes, sir.
Mr. DULLES. And you were all alone?
Mr. WILLIAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. DULLES. How much of the room could you see as you finished your lunch there? Was your view obstructed by boxes of books, or could you see a good bit of the sixth floor?
Mr. WILLIAMS. Well, at the time I couldn't see too much of the sixth floor, because the books at the time were stacked so high. I could see only in the path that I was standing--as I remember, I could not possibly see anything to the east side of the building. But just one aisle, the aisle I was standing in I could see just about to the west side of the building. So far as seeing to the east and behind me, I could only see down the aisle behind me and the aisle to the west of me.

[Dan O'meara]

It is clearly on the record. You are trying to weasel word your way out of explaining Rowlands testimony. How about you man up and relate his sighting to reality. Here is BRW's answer on someone else up there to the west.

Mr. WILLIAMS. Yes, sir.
Mr. DULLES. And you were all alone?
Mr. WILLIAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. DULLES. How much of the room could you see as you finished your lunch there? Was your view obstructed by boxes of books, or could you see a good bit of the sixth floor?
Mr. WILLIAMS. Well, at the time I couldn't see too much of the sixth floor, because the books at the time were stacked so high. I could see only in the path that I was standing--as I remember, I could not possibly see anything to the east side of the building. But just one aisle, the aisle I was standing in I could see just about to the west side of the building. So far as seeing to the east and behind me, I could only see down the aisle behind me and the aisle to the west of me.

I will gladly debate you on any aspect of this case.
Watching you fall to pieces will never get boring.
Now, for the record - do you believe Rowland invented his sighting of the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building in the minutes leading up to the assassination?
Yes or No and we can move on to anything you would like to debate.

[Dan O'meara]

He could have made that up from information that became public after the shooting. That doesn't establish he saw a gunman before the shooting and the fact he didn't alert a cop prior to the shooting makes his claim dubious.
No I don't for the reasons stated.
Your inability to think critically defies belief.
Your gullibility knows no bounds.

He could have made that up from information that became public after the shooting.

Oh, Brother...the nonsense you are forced to come up with is embarrassing.
He told his wife about the man on the 6th floor carrying a rifle way before the limo arrived in Dealey Plaza. She testifies to this.
Within minutes of the shooting he is telling Roger Craig about the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building.
It's not too long after this he is giving his affidavit in which we learn that he saw a man with a rifle through the one of the two adjoining windows that were open. The man " appeared to be a white man and appeared to have a light colored shirt on, open at the neck. He appeared to be of slender build and appeared to have dark hair.".

All this information was given long before it " became public after the shooting".
It's such a waste of time trying to debate with someone who knows so little about this case.
Every time you step outside what the Warren Commission has shoved down your throat you end up looking buffoonish.

[Jack Nessan]

I will gladly debate you on any aspect of this case.
Watching you fall to pieces will never get boring.
Now, for the record - do you believe Rowland invented his sighting of the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building in the minutes leading up to the assassination?
Yes or No and we can move on to anything you would like to debate.

Debate, is this your new battle cry? Other threads you brought up debate with other posters. Your story is so weak you now have to pretend there is something to debate? How about explain Rowland answers to Specter that is what is being discussed.

Typical CT nonsense, ask some ridiculous meaningless question instead of provide an answer. What I think is immaterial.

This is all you need to concern yourself with:

You are trying to weasel word your way out of explaining Rowlands testimony. How about you man up and relate his sighting to reality.

[Dan O'meara]

Debate, is this your new battle cry? Other threads you brought up debate with other posters. Your story is so weak you now have to pretend there is something to debate? How about explain Rowland answers to Specter that is what is being discussed.

Typical CT nonsense, ask some ridiculous meaningless question instead of provide an answer. What I think is immaterial.

This is all you need to concern yourself with:

You are trying to weasel word your way out of explaining Rowlands testimony. How about you man up and relate his sighting to reality.

As I suspected...you lack the backbone to answer the incredibly simple yes/no question that forms the basis of this thread. The thread specifically created to deal with this subject - the ridiculous claims of those who believe Rowland invented a man with a rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building and, by some miracle, happened to be right.

I understand why you won't just come out and answer a simple yes or no.
You won't do it because of how ridiculous it would make you look...and even you have your limits.

And I will debate you about any aspect of this anytime. As I say, watching you fall apart never gets old.

What I think is immaterial.

This is the truest thing you have ever posted.

[Jack Nessan]

As I suspected...you lack the backbone to answer the incredibly simple yes/no question that forms the basis of this thread. The thread specifically created to deal with this subject - the ridiculous claims of those who believe Rowland invented a man with a rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building and, by some miracle, happened to be right.

I understand why you won't just come out and answer a simple yes or no.
You won't do it because of how ridiculous it would make you look...and even you have your limits.

And I will debate you about any aspect of this anytime. As I say, watching you fall apart never gets old.

What I think is immaterial.

This is the truest thing you have ever posted.

Dan O’Meara:
I had to start this thread in response to something a Nutter posted on another thread insinuating that Arnold Rowland made up seeing the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building.
Of all the crazy things the Warren Commission has forced Nutters to believe this has to be right up there.

Who posted it? Why so vague?

Every thread subject is a debate. You do not seem to know that. It is in the heading. Maybe that is why you do so poorly at it. You don't realize where you are at.

You are currently posting on this site.

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate


Here I will read it to you. ...AND DEBATE.

[Dan O'meara]

Dan O’Meara:
I had to start this thread in response to something a Nutter posted on another thread insinuating that Arnold Rowland made up seeing the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building.
Of all the crazy things the Warren Commission has forced Nutters to believe this has to be right up there.

Who posted it? Why so vague?

Every thread subject is a debate. You do not seem to know that. It is in the heading. Maybe that is why you do so poorly at it. You don't realize where you are at.

You are currently posting on this site.

JFK Assassination Discussion & Debate


Here I will read it to you. ...AND DEBATE.

Firstly, Jack...YOU are the Nutter who inspired this thread.
You were posting your idiocy on another one of my threads that was off-topic, so I created this thread to move the subject here where anyone who believed in the Miracle On Elm Street could come and justify their silliness.

And I'm so glad you are ready to debate.
Let's go.
Firstly, just confirm that you believe Rowland invented seeing the man with the scoped, high-powered rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building. I know it's the fourth time I've asked you to answer this most simple yes/no question but you seem to lack the courage to just come out and state it plainly (and I don't really blame you).

And I'm so glad you are up for a debate.
You can kick this debate off with any piece of evidence or argument you would like.
Ask any question and I will endeavour to answer it as fully as I can.
But don't forget to answer the yes/no question.