He could have made that up from information that became public after the shooting. That doesn't establish he saw a gunman before the shooting and the fact he didn't alert a cop prior to the shooting makes his claim dubious.
No I don't for the reasons stated.
Your inability to think critically defies belief.
Your gullibility knows no bounds.
He could have made that up from information that became public after the shooting.Oh, Brother...the nonsense you are forced to come up with is embarrassing.
He told his wife about the man on the 6th floor carrying a rifle way before the limo arrived in Dealey Plaza. She testifies to this.
Within minutes of the shooting he is telling Roger Craig about the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building.
It's not too long after this he is giving his affidavit in which we learn that he saw a man with a rifle through the one of the two adjoining windows that were open. The man " appeared to be a white man and appeared to have a light colored shirt on, open at the neck. He appeared to be of slender build and appeared to have dark hair.".
All this information was given long before it " became public after the shooting".
It's such a waste of time trying to debate with someone who knows so little about this case.
Every time you step outside what the Warren Commission has shoved down your throat you end up looking buffoonish.