Author Topic: The Miracle On Elm Street  (Read 864 times)

0 Members are viewing this topic.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1454
Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Reply #14 on: Yesterday at 03:28:24 PM »
Just to have it clearly on the record, Jack - Do you believe Rowland invented seeing a man with a rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building?
It's a yes/no thing.

It is clearly on the record. You are trying to weasel word your way out of explaining Rowlands testimony. How about you man up and relate his sighting to reality. Here is BRW's answer on someone else up there to the west.

Mr. WILLIAMS. Yes, sir.
Mr. DULLES. And you were all alone?
Mr. WILLIAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. DULLES. How much of the room could you see as you finished your lunch there? Was your view obstructed by boxes of books, or could you see a good bit of the sixth floor?
Mr. WILLIAMS. Well, at the time I couldn't see too much of the sixth floor, because the books at the time were stacked so high. I could see only in the path that I was standing--as I remember, I could not possibly see anything to the east side of the building. But just one aisle, the aisle I was standing in I could see just about to the west side of the building. So far as seeing to the east and behind me, I could only see down the aisle behind me and the aisle to the west of me.






Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4090
Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Reply #15 on: Today at 05:49:46 PM »
It is clearly on the record. You are trying to weasel word your way out of explaining Rowlands testimony. How about you man up and relate his sighting to reality. Here is BRW's answer on someone else up there to the west.

Mr. WILLIAMS. Yes, sir.
Mr. DULLES. And you were all alone?
Mr. WILLIAMS. Yes, sir.

Mr. DULLES. How much of the room could you see as you finished your lunch there? Was your view obstructed by boxes of books, or could you see a good bit of the sixth floor?
Mr. WILLIAMS. Well, at the time I couldn't see too much of the sixth floor, because the books at the time were stacked so high. I could see only in the path that I was standing--as I remember, I could not possibly see anything to the east side of the building. But just one aisle, the aisle I was standing in I could see just about to the west side of the building. So far as seeing to the east and behind me, I could only see down the aisle behind me and the aisle to the west of me.

I will gladly debate you on any aspect of this case.
Watching you fall to pieces will never get boring.
Now, for the record - do you believe Rowland invented his sighting of the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building in the minutes leading up to the assassination?
Yes or No and we can move on to anything you would like to debate.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4090
Re: The Miracle On Elm Street
« Reply #16 on: Today at 06:06:03 PM »
He could have made that up from information that became public after the shooting. That doesn't establish he saw a gunman before the shooting and the fact he didn't alert a cop prior to the shooting makes his claim dubious.
No I don't for the reasons stated.
Your inability to think critically defies belief.
Your gullibility knows no bounds.

He could have made that up from information that became public after the shooting.

Oh, Brother...the nonsense you are forced to come up with is embarrassing.
He told his wife about the man on the 6th floor carrying a rifle way before the limo arrived in Dealey Plaza. She testifies to this.
Within minutes of the shooting he is telling Roger Craig about the man with the rifle on the 6th floor of the TSBD building.
It's not too long after this he is giving his affidavit in which we learn that he saw a man with a rifle through the one of the two adjoining windows that were open. The man " appeared to be a white man and appeared to have a light colored shirt on, open at the neck. He appeared to be of slender build and appeared to have dark hair.".

All this information was given long before it " became public after the shooting".
It's such a waste of time trying to debate with someone who knows so little about this case.
Every time you step outside what the Warren Commission has shoved down your throat you end up looking buffoonish.