Who needs evidence when you just make things up?
You got me. I just made up all this evidence and concocted all the fake sources (you can click on the cites to see how realistic those fake sources look):
"I would say to me it seemed like 3 or 4 seconds between the first and the second, and between the second and third, well, I guess 2 seconds, they were very close together. It could have been more time between the first and second. I really can't be sure." Pulitizer Prize winning photographer Robert Jackson
2 H 160.
"Yes, I heard one. Then there was a little bit of time, and then there were two real fast bullets together. " Linda Willis
7 H 498"The second and third shot was pretty close together, but there was a short lapse there between the first and second shot." Luke Mooney,
3 H 282"Mr. BELIN. And what about between the second and third?
Mr. CRAIG. Not more than 2 seconds. It was—they were real rapid." Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig,
6 H 263"After what I took to be about three seconds, another shot boomed out, and after what I took to be one-half the time between the first and second shots (calculated now, this would have put the third shot about one and one-half seconds after the second shot--by my estimate--to me there seemed to be a long time between the first and second shots, a much shorter time between the second and third shots--these were my impressions that day), a third shot was fired." U.S. Senator Ralph Yarborough, affidavit)
7 H 440“There was to me about twice as much time between the first and second shots as there was between the second and third shots.” Forrest Sorrels
7 H 345.
“The Presidential vehicle was approximately 200 feet from the underpass when the first shot was fired, followed in quick succession by two more.I would estimate that all three shots were fired within 5 seconds. SA Wm. McIntyre
18 H 747 “I heard a shot and about 7 seconds later another shot and approximately 2 or 3 seconds later a third shot”. Sheriff's Deputy Allan Sweatt
19 H 531.
“I heard three shots. One, then a slight pause, then two very close together”. Lee Bowers
6 H 287.
“The last two were closer than the first. In other words, it was the first, and then a pause, and then the other two were real close.” Haygood
6 H 298.
“The second shot followed some seconds, a little time elapsed after the first one, and followed very quickly by the third one”. Crawford
6 H 172. (He also confirms that the VP security car had completed the turn when the first shot was heard.)
"Q How much time elapsed from the time you heard the second noise until your heard the third noise?
A When I heard the second noise, the third was followed nearly just right back to back. It was fired in rapid succession." Buell Wesley Frazier, in his 1969 testimony at the Clay Shaw trial (Transcript, State of Louisiana v. Clay L. Shaw Trial, Feb 13, 1969, afternoon, page 27-28, part of the
HSCA JFK Collection, Ex. RG 233).
and that's not all. I made up many more.
