When are the CTs here going to tell us who, specifically, killed JFK?

[Martin Weidmann]

When are the CTs here going to tell us who, specifically, killed JFK?

"All we can say for sure is that it had to be the evil, evil, Deep State!"

LOL!

When are the CTs here going to tell us who, specifically, killed JFK?

Perhaps, when all the evidence that was surpressed and/or manipulated becomes available. Could that be the answer?

[Jarrett Smith]

The Secret Service killed him through inaction.

[Benjamin Cole]

MW--

Indeed, if the Warren Commission, and the FBI, suppressed evidence regarding the JFKA, in accordance with President LBJ's instructions that nothing be found that could trigger a nuke war with Russia...

Then, without that suppressed evidence, it is difficult to reconstruct and positively identify LHO confederates.

If LHO's confederates were G2, and made it back to Cuba, they may have been eliminated for acting without authority.

Whether by chance or design, LHO was dead soon enough too.

If the G2'ers acted without supervision, there are no paper records on the JFKA in Cuba.

And what are the odds the Cuban government would ever admit, "Oh yeah, it was a couple of our guys, double-agents, that perped the JFKA, along with LHO."

[John Corbett]

MW--

Indeed, if the Warren Commission, and the FBI, suppressed evidence regarding the JFKA, in accordance with President LBJ's instructions that nothing be found that could trigger a nuke war with Russia...

Then, without that suppressed evidence, it is difficult to reconstruct and positively identify LHO confederates.

If LHO's confederates were G2, and made it back to Cuba, they may have been eliminated for acting without authority.

Whether by chance or design, LHO was dead soon enough too.

If the G2'ers acted without supervision, there are no paper records on the JFKA in Cuba.

And what are the odds the Cuban government would ever admit, "Oh yeah, it was a couple of our guys, double-agents, that perped the JFKA, along with LHO."

Still using the all-the-evidence-has-been-suppressed excuse for why you guys can't make the case for your imagined conspiracies. You guys START was a conspiracy and then go looking for the evidence to support your premise. When you can't find any, you convince yourself all the good stuff has been hidden. Your entire premise is based on what-ifs. I count 3 in your latest post.

I remember back in the early 1990s when I was still a neophyte when it came to the internet and the JFK conspiracy debate. Shortly after Oliver Stone's movie came out, the ARRB was formed. The CTs were telling the LNs that the proof of conspiracy was just around the corner. When the bulk of the files were released, it turned out to be a big nothing burger. Ever since, the CTs have been whining that they are still holding on to the good stuff. As more and more of the files were gradually released and there was still no smoking gun, the CTs insisted that the few remaining sealed documents would have the proof they needed. When Trump finally released everything, it was still a big nothing burger. The CTs still insist evidence is being held from them. It's a matter of faith with them that there was a conspiracy and they would be able to prove that if only the government wasn't hiding the evidence. They never consider the possibility that their long-held beliefs could be wrong.