Questions for our resident forensic graphic artist, James Hackerott

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Questions for our resident forensic graphic artist, James Hackerott  (Read 855 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3254
Like a drowning man, you are glomming onto whatever drifts by, including "IDENTICAL Shadow Pattern."   

Dear Royell,

I know you're desperate, but there's no need for you to lie and exaggerate.

I never said it was an IDENTICAL shadow pattern -- how could it be, given the fact that the sun had already moved a bit in the sky and Hughes had filmed it from a much closer position and different angle than Wiegman had?

D'oh!

Just admit that while Wiegman was filming, your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" was parked right next to the "island"  -- partly visible between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora Man" -- right where it still was in the Hughes clip several minutes later and with the same recognizable shadows on it.

-- Tom

PS At least you admit that shadows are being cast on something between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora Man," so there's a smidgen of hope for you yet.

Unless, of course, you think (sic) that that "something" is a car parked on the other side of Elm Street Extension, or the TSBD wall, or some such thing.

LOL!

-- Tom
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:55:36 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4752
Dear Royell,

The shadows that were cast on a large object that immediately next to the "island" between the "Purse Lady" and "Fedora Man" in Wiegman (which object you mistakenly believe was a car parked on the other side of Elm Street Extension) were sufficiently similar -- in spite of the fact that they were photographed at different times and from different distances and angles -- to those falling on your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" in Hughes as to prove that the large object between "Purse Lady" and "Fedora Man" was nothing other than the 1958 Pontiac Bonneville -- which you've already admitted was in exactly the same spot in Hughes.

In other words, IT WAS THERE ALL ALONG.

LOL!

-- Tom

    BUMP - What you are parroting above is the Hackerott Shadow Theory. Are you now trying to take credit for his theory? This would be like stealing a car up on blocks.   

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3254
What you are parroting above is the Hackerott Shadow Theory. Are you now trying to take credit for his theory? This would be like stealing a car up on blocks.   

Dear Royell Pain in the You-Know-What,

Do try to keep up, won't you?

I've already told you that James was right about the shadows being cast on your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" in Wiegman, and that you and I, for different reasons, stupidly talked him out of it.

The only "credit" I can take is motivating him to look for other photographic images of shadows being cast on said "Getaway Car."

Thank God he had the presence of mind to take a close look at the Hughes clip.

Case Closed on Royell Storing's mythological "Getaway Car," and the Shelley and Lovelady "look-alike" bad guys who had "bailed on it there."

LOL!

-- Tom

« Last Edit: Yesterday at 05:11:07 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4752

    The claimed "DNA" Shadow of a tree limb being scrutinized over the passage of time is laughable. On top of that, you have no idea how comic book funny this is. 

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3254
The claimed "DNA" shadow of a tree limb being scrutinized over the passage of time is laughable.

Dear Royell,

Take that up with James if you want to.

The fact remains that James has proved that your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" was there all along.

Bottom line: You're looking even more foolish than usual.

-- Tom

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4752
Dear Royell,

Take that up with James if you want to.

The fact remains that James has proved that your 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Getaway Car" was there all along.

Bottom line: You're looking even more foolish than usual.

-- Tom

   "Take that up with James"?  You mouth the Hackerott Theory, but are completely unable to defend it? This is what I mean by you're drowning and grabbing at whatever  BS: floats by. Your laziness would not be tolerated out of a, "The dog ate my homework", school kid. 
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 05:48:30 PM by Royell Storing »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3254