Nothing seems to have changed

[Charles Collins]

           Baker parks his motorcycle close to the Elm St curb. He then runs up the sidewalk. This puts him on a path to be on the (R) side of the signal light pole. Look at the Darnell Film (:02). Look low to the ground. You can see the lower portion of Baker's leg trailing behind him. His BOOT Glistens in the sun. That shiny boot is clearly on the (R) side of the traffic signal pole.   

I disagree. The shadow of the traffic light pole indicates Baker is on the other side of it. Plus it appears to me that his helmet disappears behind the traffic light pole. I do believe the no parking sign pole is on the other side of Baker.

[Louis Earl]

"ALL the forensic evidence points to Lee Harvery Oswald as the assassin and there isn't a scrap of credible evidence that he had any co-conspirators."

This is because you are ignoring ALL evidence that does NOT point to LHO.

[Tom Graves]

"ALL the forensic evidence points to Lee Harvery Oswald as the assassin and there isn't a scrap of credible evidence that he had any co-conspirators."

This is because you are ignoring ALL evidence that does NOT point to LHO.

Were all of the photos, films and X-rays altered and/or faked, or just a few?

(LOL)

[Steve Barber]

I disagree. The shadow of the traffic light pole indicates Baker is on the other side of it. Plus it appears to me that his helmet disappears behind the traffic light pole. I do believe the no parking sign pole is on the other side of Baker.

As I said in my previous post, Baker is running between the traffic signal pole and the tree of highway signs-also on a pole.  He's clearly on the western side of the traffic signal pole, not the eastern side of it.

[Tom Graves]

I have discovered a car [the 1958 Pontiac Bonneville "Abandoned Getaway Car"] moving down Elm Street Extension at the same time that shots were being fired at JFK. This car is NOT on the Wiegman Film. Roughly 20 seconds later, this car IS on [sic]the Couch and Darnell Films. This is NOT "minutia". It is Brand New!

Dear Storing,

Charles Collins, Gerry Down, Steve Barber and I have proved you wrong.

Don't feel bad, though, because even The Great James Hackerott was fooled by your "the circular object in Wiegman is the taillight / brake light on another car on the other side of the street" explanation.

(LOL)

-- Tom

[Charles Collins]

As I said in my previous post, Baker is running between the traffic signal pole and the tree of highway signs-also on a pole.  He's clearly on the western side of the traffic signal pole, not the eastern side of it.

Thanks Steve, there is also a third pole that isn’t apparent from this angle but shows up in the William Allen photo of the tramps crossing the street. It is reportedly a parking sign and is inline with and behind the traffic signal pole from the angle in Weigman’s and Darnell’s films. It appears to me that Baker also runs between the traffic signal pole and that parking sign pole.

[Tom Graves]

Thanks Steve, there is also a third pole that isn’t apparent from this angle but shows up in the William Allen photo of the tramps crossing the street. It is reportedly a parking sign and is in line with and behind the traffic signal pole from the angle in Weigman’s and Darnell’s films. It appears to me that Baker also runs between the traffic signal pole and that parking sign pole.

How many feet of "island" did Baker run across?

[Charles Collins]

How many feet of "island" did Baker run across?

My guesstimate: