Nothing seems to have changed

[Charles Collins]

Does it really matter which side of "the pole" Baker ran?

Isn't the important thing the fact that the Storing's Abandoned Getaway Car, a seventeen-and-a-half-foot-long 1958 Pontiac Bonneville -- with its distinctive rocket 'exhaust' delineated by two horizontal lines on the rear panel -- can be seen parked next to the island in several photographic images, including the Darnell clip and, about twenty-five seconds earlier in the Wiegman clip, and that in the latter it visually merges with a car parked the wrong way on the other side of Elm Street Extension?

It matters to me primarily because I like learning how to interpret the photographic record more accurately. But I agree it seems mostly irrelevant to the discussion we were having before this question arose.

[Tom Graves]

Tom Graves asked:

"Does it really matter which side of 'the pole' Baker ran? Isn't the important thing the fact that the Storing's Abandoned Getaway Car, a seventeen-and-a-half-foot-long 1958 Pontiac Bonneville -- with its distinctive rocket 'exhaust' delineated by two horizontal lines on the rear panel -- can be seen parked next to the island in several photographic images, including the Darnell clip and, about twenty-five seconds earlier, in the Wiegman clip, and that in the latter it visually merges with a car that may be parked the wrong way on the other side of Elm Street Extension?"

My reply:

It matters to me primarily because I like learning how to interpret the photographic record more accurately. But I agree it seems mostly irrelevant to the discussion we were having before this question arose.

I see.

[Royell Storing]

Hold everything! ( No pun intended).  I'M WRONG, and ROYELL IS CORRECT.  Baker does pass in *front* of the traffic signal pole!  I am working on making a GIF of Marrion Baker, as seen in my copy of the Darnell film.  It's unmistakable that he is between Darnell's camera and the light signal pole.

   STEVE - Knowing the quality of the JFK Assassination images that you posses and have access to, your observations and opinions hold great value. I wish you would come around here more often and raise the level of discourse with your observations and opinions. Your long experience with the JFK Assassination is invaluable.

[John Corbett]

  I totally disagree. I have discovered a car moving down the Elm St Ext at the same time that shots were being fired at JFK. This car is NOT on the Wiegman Film. Roughly 20 seconds later this car IS on the Couch and Darnell Films. This is NOT "minutia". It is Brand New!
  I have also proven that the Darnell and Martin Films do Not show Officer Haygood inside the Railroad Yard. The DPD motorcycle cop filmed with DPD Officer Harkness on the Darnell film is not Officer Haygood. The time stamping of these 2 DPD Cops being filmed together is alleged to be Before 12:35. Officer Haygood made a documented 12:35 police radio transmission from his motorcycle parked at the Elm St curb. DPD Officer Harkness made a documented 12:36 police radio transmission that he was transporting eyewitness Amos Euins to the TSBD. The timelines of Officer Haygood and Officer Harkness make it impossible for them to be filmed together on the Darnell film before 12:35. This is not "minutia". It is Brand New!

Even if all of this is true, what do you think it proves?

[Royell Storing]

Even if all of this is true, what do you think it proves?

   It makes obvious the ability or inability to interpret JFK Assassination images. And a big part of interpreting an image is knowing the foundation/back story. It also displays the animus toward new JFK Assassination concepts.

[Tom Graves]

Even if all of this is true, what do you think it proves?

He thinks it proves that oodles and gobs of bad guys and bad gals were involved in the planning, the patsy-ing, the planting of false evidence, the shooting, the getting-away, the alteration of all of the photos, films and X-rays, and the obviously ongoing, all-important cover up.

[John Corbett]

If you think this photo and the films you have referenced prove anything, you need to establish EXACT times each of them was taken. Approximations won't cut it. As for the photo just posted, I have no idea when it was taken but it obviously was not taken during the shooting. I have no idea where you are going with this.