Does Connally's wrist wound disprove the SBT?

[Dan O'meara]

   DAN -  Go to YOU TUBE.   Search -  " Zapruder Film JFK Assassination Best Quality HD 1080p"   by - windvale  (0:28)

       That's a far better Z Film Copy than the one you have posted above.

I'm already aware of Windvale's site - https://www.youtube.com/@windvale/videos

Although it's a great resource, nothing he has posted is that much better in quality.

[Royell Storing]

I'm already aware of Windvale's site - https://www.youtube.com/@windvale/videos

Although it's a great resource, nothing he has posted is that much better in quality.

   Your call on the research material you want to hang your hat on.
   With respect to the Z Film snippet you have posted, that snippet is a perfect example of why anything taken out of context can then be interpreted in many different ways. If you had presented the Z Film Frames Immediately following the end of your posted snippet, everyone would see that Gov Connally then turned all the way around and went face-to-face with JFK. Your claim that Connally had already suffered rib damage, a punctured lung, and a fractured (R) wrist prior to his "turn around" point, is hard to believe. If you examine a better Z Film Copy, you will see that Connally has his mouth wide open when he is in the process of completing that "turn around" toward JFK. This is the portion of the Z Film that I believe Dan Rather was referencing with respect to his reporting seeing Gov Connally get shot in the chest when facing the TSBD. (paraphrasing). The Hi Definition JFK Assassination Images that we are now being permitted to examine, are answering many 62+ yr old questions that have previously hindered the solving of this case. Rather viewing an even better copy of the Z Film than we have now, makes his Z Film Reporting the weekend of the assassination increasingly credible.   

[Dan O'meara]

   Your call on the research material you want to hang your hat on.
   With respect to the Z Film snippet you have posted, that snippet is a perfect example of why anything taken out of context can then be interpreted in many different ways. If you had presented the Z Film Frames Immediately following the end of your posted snippet, everyone would see that Gov Connally then turned all the way around and went face-to-face with JFK. Your claim that Connally had already suffered rib damage, a punctured lung, and a fractured (R) wrist prior to his "turn around" point, is hard to believe. If you examine a better Z Film Copy, you will see that Connally has his mouth wide open when he is in the process of completing that "turn around" toward JFK. This is the portion of the Z Film that I believe Dan Rather was referencing with respect to his reporting seeing Gov Connally get shot in the chest when facing the TSBD. (paraphrasing). The Hi Definition JFK Assassination Images that we are now being permitted to examine, are answering many 62+ yr old questions that have previously hindered the solving of this case. Rather viewing an even better copy of the Z Film than we have now, makes his Z Film Reporting the weekend of the assassination increasingly credible.   

The stills and clip I have posted perfectly demonstrate the exact moment the bullet passed through both men.
Just because you find it "hard to believe" doesn't mean anything.
You provide no counter-argument or counter-evidence.
We have versions of the Z-film many times better than the shaky, blurry home movie Dan Rather based his disastrously incorrect impressions on. After a single, hurried view, he got almost everything wrong about it.
That you would take his incoherent ramblings over the actual film says it all about what you are willing to hang your hat on.

[Royell Storing]

The stills and clip I have posted perfectly demonstrate the exact moment the bullet passed through both men.
Just because you find it "hard to believe" doesn't mean anything.
You provide no counter-argument or counter-evidence.
We have versions of the Z-film many times better than the shaky, blurry home movie Dan Rather based his disastrously incorrect impressions on. After a single, hurried view, he got almost everything wrong about it.
That you would take his incoherent ramblings over the actual film says it all about what you are willing to hang your hat on.

    (1) Why do you believe that Rather was viewing a Z Film copy that was "shaky, blurry, home movie..." quality?  (2) How many "...shaky, blurry, home movie..." Z Film "copies" do you believe were already floating around on the weekend of the assassination? 
   
     I would have far less respect for Rather's LIVE World Wide Z Film observations if CBS had then assigned him to Hoboken, New Jersey. Instead, his LIVE Z Film "incoherent ramblings" were rewarded with Rather being selected to replace Walter Cronkite as the CBS Anchor Man. I believe this was Rather being rewarded for his Z Film silence going forward. NBC to this day has Not released its' Original Wiegman Film. NBC to this day has Not released its' Original Darnell Film. Rather's Z Film silence going forward is right in line with this continuing "cooperation" by the "News" Media. 

[Andrew Mason]

Could a bullet have passed through the wrist holding the cowboy hat, and then entered his left thigh? The wrist seems too close to the right side of JBC.

How did the bullet pass through JBC's wrist from the dorsal (wristwatch side)?

At Z-227, JBC appears to holding his cowboy hat in front of himself, although the image is blurry.

https://assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/

JBC and his wife both said the shot pattern was: JFK struck by the first audible shot, JBC by the second, and JFK by the third.

Something doesn't add up about the SBT.

The SBT was concocted by Arlen Specter to explain where the bullet that passed through JFK’s neck went. No one considered the possibility that Connally was struck by two separate bullets, although some members of the WC (McCloy and possibly Russell) thought that Connally could have been hit in the back and not felt it.

To see where the bullet went after passing through JFK’s midline one has to first determine when it occurred and then recreate the trajectory from the SN through JFK and see what it could have hit. It appears to have occurred between z190 and z200 and a right to left shot through JFK at that time would have gone to the left of Connally’s spine.

There is a simple explanation that vindicates the Connally’s adamant position that the SBT is wrong and is perfectly consistent with a single shooter.

[Benjamin Cole]

RS--

That is correct.

I didn't want to go through the whole song-and-dance, but in fact Gov. JBC makes a 180-degree turn in his seat after Z-223, then begins to again face forward, and then is struck and pushed forward violently ~Z-295.

Exactly as he testified to the WC and HSCA.

Those who posit that JBC was shot at ~Z-223, are also positing JBC makes a 180-degree run in his seat to check on JFK---after JBC had been shot through the chest, had a section of rib expelled through a large exit wound in his chest, then had his wrist fractured and then had a bullet penetrate his thigh.

That just does seem to hold water.

In fact, the only reason I believe there was a JFKA conspiracy is the cadence of shots. A single-shot per bolt-action rifle could not strike JBC and JFK within one second.

That leads to a second gunsel. The GK smoke-and-bang show is also suspicious, and possibly a diversion.

I suspect there was a small plot to perp the JFKA, although if G2 was involved, who knows how high up it went.

[Royell Storing]

The SBT was concocted by Arlen Specter to explain where the bullet that passed through JFK’s neck went. No one considered the possibility that Connally was struck by two separate bullets, although some members of the WC (McCloy and possibly Russell) thought that Connally could have been hit in the back and not felt it.

To see where the bullet went after passing through JFK’s midline one has to first determine when it occurred and then recreate the trajectory from the SN through JFK and see what it could have hit. It appears to have occurred between z190 and z200 and a right to left shot through JFK at that time would have gone to the left of Connally’s spine.

There is a simple explanation that vindicates the Connally’s adamant position that the SBT is wrong and is perfectly consistent with a single shooter.

   The assumption You are making is that the JFK Back Wound connected to the JFK Throat Wound. We all know that Dr Humes jammed his finger into that back wound and the depth of that wound stopped at the 1st knuckle of Humes finger. This shallow back wound being the result of the bullet that SA Paul Landis has admitted to finding in the back seat of the JFK Limo at Parkland Hospital. The importance of somehow connecting those 2 wounds is why Specter handled the Q/A of Tomlinson. Tomlinson found the Magic Bullet that SA Landis placed on a gurney at Parkland Hospital. Then, Gerald Ford moved the Warren Report written description of the JFK BACK Wound up to the base of JFK's neck. Total