Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim  (Read 850 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4454
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2025, 02:35:28 PM »
Brugioni did not claim that the version of the Zapruder film we have now shows a much shorter headshot sequence than the version he saw. He claimed that the version of the Zapruder film that he saw on the weekend of the assassination showed the headshot "explosion" in more than one frame. In extant Zapruder film, the headshot "explosion", including the red mist, is visible in 3 frames. Brugioni was not shown the extant film or any of the first or second generation copies by Horne or Janney.

   The important part of that "red mist" is that it goes UPWARD. We do Not see anything blowing out of that massive hole in JFK's (R) Temple region. Based on what the Zapruder Film shows, that massive hole should have had blood/brain matter blowing out of it like a whale's blow hole. AND, the (R) side of the JFK Limo should have been massively blood splattered too. A mere shaving cut produces far more blood than what the Zapruder Film shows coming from that alleged massive hole in JFK's (R) temple area. The stuff on the Z Film flies in the face of what many of us experience in day-to-day life.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2025, 02:35:28 PM »


Online Jarrett Smith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2025, 09:04:09 PM »
   The important part of that "red mist" is that it goes UPWARD. We do Not see anything blowing out of that massive hole in JFK's (R) Temple region. Based on what the Zapruder Film shows, that massive hole should have had blood/brain matter blowing out of it like a whale's blow hole. AND, the (R) side of the JFK Limo should have been massively blood splattered too. A mere shaving cut produces far more blood than what the Zapruder Film shows coming from that alleged massive hole in JFK's (R) temple area. The stuff on the Z Film flies in the face of what many of us experience in day-to-day life.

Here is a clearer version you can see a large area of debris pelting the Connally's.


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4454
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2025, 09:20:36 PM »
Here is a clearer version you can see a large area of debris pelting the Connally's.



   Go to YOU TUBE.   Search - "Zapruder Film JFK Assassination Best Quality HD 1080p"   by - windvale   (0:28) 
   This is a far more detailed copy than the above Z Film snippet you have posted above. Including between the sprocket holes. Let me know what you see/don't see.   

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2025, 09:20:36 PM »


Offline Louis Earl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #19 on: Yesterday at 01:36:29 AM »
"SA Clint Hill was able to run the car down and then scale the trunk."  There are copious photos taken that day, all the way from Love Field to Elm Street that all show that the SS follow up car was almost touching the limo.  There was no "run the car down" involved at all.  That's a fairy tale the same as Greer gunning the engine and the limo lurching forward. 

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4454
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 02:23:14 AM »
"SA Clint Hill was able to run the car down and then scale the trunk."  There are copious photos taken that day, all the way from Love Field to Elm Street that all show that the SS follow up car was almost touching the limo.  There was no "run the car down" involved at all.  That's a fairy tale the same as Greer gunning the engine and the limo lurching forward.
 
 Have you viewed the Bell Film showing the JFK Limo and the Queen Mary approaching/going under the Triple Underpass? Or how about the Paschall Film? There's a GAP between the 2 vehicles on both of those films.  How did that GAP happen? The real issue surrounding this GAP is there being a JFK Limo "rolling stop" or possibly a flat-out STOP! You gotta ask yourself how Wiegman filmed the JFK Limo going under the Triple Underpass if there was no Rolling Stop or a flat-out STOP of the JFK Limo. Tick/Tock issue being front and center. The rolling stop or the Stop itself, does back up the WC Testimony of ASAIC Kellerman claiming the JFK Limo, "...jumped out of the god damned street", when SA Greer did finally put the peddle to the metal.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 02:25:13 AM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 02:23:14 AM »


Offline Louis Earl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #21 on: Yesterday at 07:59:23 PM »
Nice red herring.  Have you seen the Zapruder film?  It shows the 2 cars almost touching when they came down Elm.   What does their spacing at the underpass have to do with it?

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4454
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 11:39:34 PM »
Nice red herring.  Have you seen the Zapruder film?  It shows the 2 cars almost touching when they came down Elm.   What does their spacing at the underpass have to do with it?

   The "spacing" has to do with: (1) Missing Time, (2) JFK Limo "rolling stop" or a flat-out "stop", and (3) there being even more missing from the Z Film than the JFK Limo turning onto Elm St.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 11:39:34 PM »