Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim  (Read 5458 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2109
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2025, 11:24:02 AM »
Dino Brugioni claimed that he had seen a different version of the Zapruder film which included a large red mist over JFKs head, which lasted 2 to 3 frames, at the time of the fatal head shot. The Zapruder film as it stands only shows a red mist for 1 frame which is frame 313. Brugioni claimed that the version of the Zapruder film we have now shows a much shorter headshot sequence than the version he saw.

However Abraham Zapruder disproves such a claim. When Zapruder sold the rights of the  Zapruder film to LIFE magazine, he stipulated that frame 313 must never be published, a stipulation that LIFE honored. The fact that Zapruder stipulated that only 1 frame must not be published, and not 2-3 frames, is prima facia evidence that the gore of the headshot did not last longer than 1 frame.

Brugioni did not claim that the version of the Zapruder film we have now shows a much shorter headshot sequence than the version he saw. He claimed that the version of the Zapruder film that he saw on the weekend of the assassination showed the headshot "explosion" in more than one frame. In extant Zapruder film, the headshot "explosion", including the red mist, is visible in 3 frames. Brugioni was not shown the extant film or any of the first or second generation copies by Horne or Janney.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2025, 02:27:02 PM »
CBS probably didn't realize that he'd screwed up on so many things until several years later.

Regardless, at least he got the "money shot" (pardon the pun): JFK had been shot in the head, JBC had been shot somewhere, and that Jackie had tried to jump out of the car or some-such thing.

Oh yeah, and that it happened in Dallas, Texas.

On Elm Street.

    CBS, NBC, ABC ALL knew what was on the Zapruder film. Rather also said on World Wide TV that he could see Gov Connally being shot in the chest as he turned around toward JFK.
    And for the record, NBC still refuses to release their Original Darnell and Wiegman Films. The Wiegman Film being vital as he did film the JFK Limo going under the Triple Underpass. The Tick/Tock of Wiegman capturing the JFK Limo is relative to a JFK Limo "Rolling Stop" or a flat-out "Stop". And of course, my discovery of Wiegman NOT Filming the "getaway" car being parked alongside the Island. That "getaway" car was traveling down the Elm St Ext while Wiegman was filming the Island.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2025, 02:35:28 PM »
Brugioni did not claim that the version of the Zapruder film we have now shows a much shorter headshot sequence than the version he saw. He claimed that the version of the Zapruder film that he saw on the weekend of the assassination showed the headshot "explosion" in more than one frame. In extant Zapruder film, the headshot "explosion", including the red mist, is visible in 3 frames. Brugioni was not shown the extant film or any of the first or second generation copies by Horne or Janney.

   The important part of that "red mist" is that it goes UPWARD. We do Not see anything blowing out of that massive hole in JFK's (R) Temple region. Based on what the Zapruder Film shows, that massive hole should have had blood/brain matter blowing out of it like a whale's blow hole. AND, the (R) side of the JFK Limo should have been massively blood splattered too. A mere shaving cut produces far more blood than what the Zapruder Film shows coming from that alleged massive hole in JFK's (R) temple area. The stuff on the Z Film flies in the face of what many of us experience in day-to-day life.

Online Jarrett Smith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2025, 09:04:09 PM »
   The important part of that "red mist" is that it goes UPWARD. We do Not see anything blowing out of that massive hole in JFK's (R) Temple region. Based on what the Zapruder Film shows, that massive hole should have had blood/brain matter blowing out of it like a whale's blow hole. AND, the (R) side of the JFK Limo should have been massively blood splattered too. A mere shaving cut produces far more blood than what the Zapruder Film shows coming from that alleged massive hole in JFK's (R) temple area. The stuff on the Z Film flies in the face of what many of us experience in day-to-day life.

Here is a clearer version you can see a large area of debris pelting the Connally's.


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2025, 09:20:36 PM »
Here is a clearer version you can see a large area of debris pelting the Connally's.



   Go to YOU TUBE.   Search - "Zapruder Film JFK Assassination Best Quality HD 1080p"   by - windvale   (0:28) 
   This is a far more detailed copy than the above Z Film snippet you have posted above. Including between the sprocket holes. Let me know what you see/don't see.   

Offline Louis Earl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #19 on: January 01, 2026, 01:36:29 AM »
"SA Clint Hill was able to run the car down and then scale the trunk."  There are copious photos taken that day, all the way from Love Field to Elm Street that all show that the SS follow up car was almost touching the limo.  There was no "run the car down" involved at all.  That's a fairy tale the same as Greer gunning the engine and the limo lurching forward. 

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Zapruder disproves Brugionis 2-3 frame headshot claim
« Reply #20 on: January 01, 2026, 02:23:14 AM »
"SA Clint Hill was able to run the car down and then scale the trunk."  There are copious photos taken that day, all the way from Love Field to Elm Street that all show that the SS follow up car was almost touching the limo.  There was no "run the car down" involved at all.  That's a fairy tale the same as Greer gunning the engine and the limo lurching forward.
 
 Have you viewed the Bell Film showing the JFK Limo and the Queen Mary approaching/going under the Triple Underpass? Or how about the Paschall Film? There's a GAP between the 2 vehicles on both of those films.  How did that GAP happen? The real issue surrounding this GAP is there being a JFK Limo "rolling stop" or possibly a flat-out STOP! You gotta ask yourself how Wiegman filmed the JFK Limo going under the Triple Underpass if there was no Rolling Stop or a flat-out STOP of the JFK Limo. Tick/Tock issue being front and center. The rolling stop or the Stop itself, does back up the WC Testimony of ASAIC Kellerman claiming the JFK Limo, "...jumped out of the god damned street", when SA Greer did finally put the peddle to the metal.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2026, 02:25:13 AM by Royell Storing »