When-oh-when did Clint Hill leap from the Secret Service follow-up car?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Marjan Rynkiewicz

Author Topic: When-oh-when did Clint Hill leap from the Secret Service follow-up car?  (Read 370 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
Advertisement
Dear World-Famous Comrade Storing,

Why are you obsessed with Holland's probably incorrect theory when, in fact, Oswald's first, missing-everything shot was more likely at "Z-124," i.e., a second later than Holland's "Z-107"?

-- Tom

   What bothers me is the general acceptance by the JFK Assassination Research Community of the Holland "Theory" without any serious push back. A major part of this is due to it being broadcast world wide by National Geographic. This is the same thing we saw transpire with CBS, NBC, ABC, and PBS doing likewise with the WC Whitewash during the 60's and 70's. Anybody bucking this "rip tide" gets their appearances/opinions Black Balled. And that translates into $$. What we are seeing with Holland's half baked theories is the JFK Assassination Research Community simply "going with the flow". Anybody doing the deep dive research and revealing the Holland Baloney for what it is, is soon preaching to a congregation of 1. And this media generated riptide includes the famed Sixth Floor Museum too. 
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 03:18:59 PM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2584
   What bothers me is the general acceptance by the JFK Assassination Research Community of the Holland "Theory" without any serious push back. A major part of this is due to it being broadcast world wide by National Geographic. This is the same thing we saw transpire with CBS, NBC, ABC, and PBS doing likewise with the WC Whitewash during the 60's and 70's. Anybody bucking this "rip tide" gets their appearances/opinions Black Balled. And that translates into $$. What we are seeing with Holland's half baked theories is the JFK Assassination Research Community simply "going with the flow". Anybody doing the deep dive research and revealing the Holland Baloney for what it is, is soon preaching to a congregation of 1. And this media generated riptide includes the famed Sixth Floor Museum too.

Holland arrived at his partially right* theory in 2007 or so.

It's 2025, going on 2026 now.

Things change.

It's known as progress.

*That the first shot occurred before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.


Offline Jake Maxwell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 757
   What bothers me is the general acceptance by the JFK Assassination Research Community of the Holland "Theory" without any serious push back. A major part of this is due to it being broadcast world wide by National Geographic. This is the same thing we saw transpire with CBS, NBC, ABC, and PBS doing likewise with the WC Whitewash during the 60's and 70's. Anybody bucking this "rip tide" gets their appearances/opinions Black Balled. And that translates into $$. What we are seeing with Holland's half baked theories is the JFK Assassination Research Community simply "going with the flow". Anybody doing the deep dive research and revealing the Holland Baloney for what it is, is soon preaching to a congregation of 1. And this media generated riptide includes the famed Sixth Floor Museum too.

A lot of folks are eating Holland Baloney sandwiches...

Assuming a sixth floor lone gunman's first shot hit the traffic signal pole... then a second shot hit Kennedy in the back, and a third shot blew off his head... How does Holland's theory account for the bullet hitting the curb and a fragment hitting James Tague on the cheek?



JFK Assassination Forum


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
Holland arrived at his partially right* theory in 2007 or so.

It's 2025, going on 2026 now.

Things change.

It's known as progress.

*That the first shot occurred before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.

   "Progress"? Based on what EVIDENCE?  We have: (1) a shot that is alleged to have been fired when Zapruder just happened to Not be filming, and (2) this same shot also then transforming into a "Lost Bullet". And you label this as, "Progress"? The Brothers Grimm also composed several drafts of their fairy tales before deciding on their final draft. 

Online Jarrett Smith

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Holland arrived at his partially right* theory in 2007 or so.

It's 2025, going on 2026 now.

Things change.

It's known as progress.

*That the first shot occurred before Zapruder resumed filming at Z-133.

There is zero proof of a shot that early Comrade.

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2584
There is zero proof of a shot that early [at "Z-124"].

"Proof"?

What's your definition of "proof" in this context?

I would say the fact that eight prime witnesses, including JFK, moved their heads rapidly and consciously within half-a-second of each other about a second after the first, missing everything, shot was fired comes pretty darn close (pardon the pun).

« Last Edit: Today at 08:38:40 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
"Proof"?

What's your definition of "proof" in this context?

I would say that the fact that seven prime witnesses, including JFK, moved their heads rapidly and consciously within half-a-second of each other about a second after the first, missing everything, shot was fired comes pretty darn close (pardon the pun).

         You're a prosecuting attorney's "dream" juror. 

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2584
You're a prosecuting attorney's "dream" juror.

Dear Comrade Storing,

In your never-ending nightmare.

-- Tom

JFK Assassination Forum