A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys

[John Corbett]

   You have admitted to no longer doing any JFK Assassination Research. This is why you are currently "flying blind". This is why you are consistently making dumb Declarations like the DPD "RELEASED" the car. You simply do Not Know. You do Not know the facts and admit to Not even looking for the facts. You admit to being dumb. You've quit. You've surrendered. I accept your sword.
   I continue acquiring Facts. Fact-By-Fact, Brick-By-Brick. Constructing a WALL. Unlike YOU, I do not huff-n-puff and then get forced into folding. If I say, "I got it", I got it. And I work very hard at "gotting it". This ain't easy, and I have yet to stumble across a single image disproving this was an intended "getaway" car. Not a single frame. Every brick I find has "getaway" written all over it. And the car license plate is becoming clearer and clearer. Ever watched Costner/Hackman "No Way Out"? The plate continues becoming clearer.

Hey, dummy. You still don't understand how the process works even though it has been explained to you many times. When you come up with a hypothesis, you have the burden of supplying the evidence to support your hypothesis. It does not stand as a proven fact until somebody disproves it. You NEVER offer any evidence for your wholly speculative claims. All you do is make a declaration and say, "Prove me wrong". Nobody needs to prove you are wrong.  You have to prove you are right. You don't even seem to know how to do that.

1. You have provided no evidence the car in question was a getaway car.

2. You have provided no evidence the cops immobilized it.

3. You have provided no evidence a cop was guarding the car with a shotgun.

You have simply declared these things to be true without offering a scrap of evidence to support your declarations. Why should anyone take you seriously? Here's a clue for you. Nobody does.

[Royell Storing]

Hey, dummy. You still don't understand how the process works even though it has been explained to you many times. When you come up with a hypothesis, you have the burden of supplying the evidence to support your hypothesis. It does not stand as a proven fact until somebody disproves it. You NEVER offer any evidence for your wholly speculative claims. All you do is make a declaration and say, "Prove me wrong". Nobody needs to prove you are wrong.  You have to prove you are right. You don't even seem to know how to do that.

1. You have provided no evidence the car in question was a getaway car.

2. You have provided no evidence the cops immobilized it.

3. You have provided no evidence a cop was guarding the car with a shotgun.

You have simply declared these things to be true without offering a scrap of evidence to support your declarations. Why should anyone take you seriously? Here's a clue for you. Nobody does.

     Uncle Miltie - Instead of giving me credit for Discovering this "getaway" car NOT being on the Wiegman Film, you want to leap frog into our recently discovered Image Evidence regarding the DPD reaction to the car. 62+ years and nobody noticed this car Not being on the Wiegman Film? I still have "curtain calls" to take before we clue self admitted "Dead Weight" such as yourself in.
                        I have managed to arouse your curiosity. This is a step in the right direction and a feather in my cap. Now, if I can only get you "off the dime" and actively researching the JFK Assassination once again. That's a serious challenge.     

[John Corbett]

     Uncle Miltie - Instead of giving me credit for Discovering this "getaway" car NOT being on the Wiegman Film, you want to leap frog into our recently discovered Image Evidence regarding the DPD reaction to the car. 62+ years and nobody noticed this car Not being on the Wiegman Film? I still have "curtain calls" to take before we clue self admitted "Dead Weight" such as yourself in.
                        I have managed to arouse your curiosity. This is a step in the right direction and a feather in my cap. Now, if I can only get you "off the dime" and actively researching the JFK Assassination once again. That's a serious challenge.   

You've put so many feathers in your cap you have a warbonnet now. The only thing you've aroused in me are the chuckles I get from reading your insane theories. There was no getaway car. The fact that the car in question doesn't appear in the Wiegman film isn't evidence of anything. You have assumed the DPD reacted to the car but provided no evidence of such. I have pointed out three very basic items for which you have provided ZERO evidence. You have assumed all of these things to be true. Despite the challenge, you still can't provide evidence. What exactly should anybody give you credit for. Dreaming up a goofy theory out of thin air? If I did that, I would be obliged to do the same for all the other CTs I've engage with over the years who have also cooked up some insane theories with no evidence to support them. I will credit you for taking goofiness to a whole new level.

[Royell Storing]

You've put so many feathers in your cap you have a warbonnet now. The only thing you've aroused in me are the chuckles I get from reading your insane theories. There was no getaway car. The fact that the car in question doesn't appear in the Wiegman film isn't evidence of anything. You have assumed the DPD reacted to the car but provided no evidence of such. I have pointed out three very basic items for which you have provided ZERO evidence. You have assumed all of these things to be true. Despite the challenge, you still can't provide evidence. What exactly should anybody give you credit for. Dreaming up a goofy theory out of thin air? If I did that, I would be obliged to do the same for all the other CTs I've engage with over the years who have also cooked up some insane theories with no evidence to support them. I will credit you for taking goofiness to a whole new level.

   Your acceptance of the CAR NOT being on the Wiegman Film is a Huge 1st Step "Daniel Son". You don't realize it, but You have actually taken 2 Steps. By accepting that the CAR was NOT on the Wiegman Film, You are also accepting that this CAR was in Motion down the Elm St Extension while shot(s) were being fired at JFK. You just had your very own, "Wax On, Wax Off" moment. You are Now on your way. Enjoy the journey.

[Lance Payette]

You've put so many feathers in your cap you have a warbonnet now.

Or feathers in his crap, as the case may be.

[John Corbett]

   Your acceptance of the CAR NOT being on the Wiegman Film is a Huge 1st Step "Daniel Son". You don't realize it, but You have actually taken 2 Steps. By accepting that the CAR was NOT on the Wiegman Film, You are also accepting that this CAR was in Motion down the Elm St Extension while shot(s) were being fired at JFK. You just had your very own, "Wax On, Wax Off" moment. You are Now on your way. Enjoy the journey.

I have no idea whether the car appears in the Wiegman film or not and I don't really care. I took you at your word that the car doesn't appear in the film but it makes no difference if it does or not. You have presented nothing that even makes me curious about it. Over the past 35 years, I have seen literally hundreds of CT rabbit holes and I have better things to do then go down every one of them. Yours is no exception. Once you've seen one rabbit hole, you've seen them all.