Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.  (Read 82219 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2379
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #240 on: October 01, 2025, 04:57:10 AM »
Advertisement
You're avoiding the question, Tommy.

Who do you think the man is facing Gloria?

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

I have no idea.

By the same token, who do you think is wearing Lovelady's shirt and walking / running down Elm Street Extension towards the railway yard about 25 seconds after the final shot in Couch, and who is that pivoting, suit-wearing guy with the receding hairline is in front of the steps in Darnell?

-- Tom
« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 04:58:13 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #240 on: October 01, 2025, 04:57:10 AM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3704
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #241 on: October 01, 2025, 05:03:39 AM »
Dear danny BOY o'meara,

I have no idea.

By the same token, who do you think is wearing Lovelady's shirt and walking / running down Elm Street Extension towards the railway yard about 25 seconds after the final shot, and who is that pivoting, suit-wearing guy with the receding hairline is in front of the steps in Darnell?

-- Tom

I have no idea.

Not good enough Tommy.
You and Sandy were pivotal in the identification of Glorai on the steps in this picture.
You must have discussed this image, or one like it, in immense detail.
You tried Joe Molina at one point, so you had an opinion then (one you have correctly abandoned)

It's not good enough to say you have no idea and you know that.
The man in question must have been considered pivotal as far as your identification of Gloria was concerned, so you must give some kind of answer.
You are undermining your own contribution to this case by bailing out on this issue.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2379
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #242 on: October 01, 2025, 05:37:54 AM »
I have no idea.

Not good enough Tommy.
You and Sandy were pivotal in the identification of Glorai on the steps in this picture.
You must have discussed this image, or one like it, in immense detail.
You tried Joe Molina at one point, so you had an opinion then (one you have correctly abandoned)

It's not good enough to say you have no idea and you know that.
The man in question must have been considered pivotal as far as your identification of Gloria was concerned, so you must give some kind of answer.
You are undermining your own contribution to this case by bailing out on this issue.

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

It's interesting that you can't explain why the Lovelady figure walking / running down Elm Street Extension in Couch-Darnell is wearing Lovelady's shirt and has Lovelady's bald spot.

It must be very disconcerting for you.

-- Tom
« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 05:40:02 AM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #242 on: October 01, 2025, 05:37:54 AM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3704
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #243 on: October 01, 2025, 05:51:28 AM »
Dear danny BOY o'meara,

It's interesting that you can't explain why the Lovelady figure walking / running down Elm Street Extension in Couch-Darnell is wearing Lovelady's shirt and has Lovelady's bald spot.

It must be very disconcerting for you.

-- Tom

Come on, Tommy.
Who is the man on the steps?



White men on the steps:
Buell Frazier - no, we can see him at the top of the steps
Bill Shelley - no, Shelley had on a black jacket and a quiff
Joe Molina - no, was wearing a white shirt and reported interacting with Gloria in the lobby
Otis Williams - no, was wearing a white shirt

This leaves Billy Lovelady.
It can only be Billy Lovelady.
What possible alternative is there?


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4178
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #244 on: October 01, 2025, 05:51:39 AM »
I have no idea.

Not good enough Tommy.
You and Sandy were pivotal in the identification of Glorai on the steps in this picture.
You must have discussed this image, or one like it, in immense detail.
You tried Joe Molina at one point, so you had an opinion then (one you have correctly abandoned)

It's not good enough to say you have no idea and you know that.
The man in question must have been considered pivotal as far as your identification of Gloria was concerned, so you must give some kind of answer.
You are undermining your own contribution to this case by bailing out on this issue.

   Do you have a timestamp for the image showing Lovelady on the (R) side of the TSBD Front Steps?  Law Enforcement is in the background controlling the TSBD front door. This needs to be factored into the timeline of that Lovelady image.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 05:59:46 AM by Royell Storing »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #244 on: October 01, 2025, 05:51:39 AM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3704
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #245 on: October 01, 2025, 05:58:02 AM »
   Do you have a timestamp for the image showing Lovelady on the (R) side of the TSBD Front Steps?  Law Enforcement is in the background controlling the TSBD front door. This needs to be factored into the timeline of this Lovelady image.

What about the Darnell/Couch footage makes you believe there is "Law Enforcement...controlling the TSBD front door"?
Remember, this isn't a single photograph, this is a still taken from film footage that has an overwhelming amount of information in it proving it is taken within seconds of the assassination.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2025, 05:58:43 AM by Dan O'meara »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4178
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #246 on: October 01, 2025, 06:10:33 AM »
What about the Darnell/Couch footage makes you believe there is "Law Enforcement...controlling the TSBD front door"?
Remember, this isn't a single photograph, this is a still taken from film footage that has an overwhelming amount of information in it proving it is taken within seconds of the assassination.

   Darnell/Couch does Not show Lovelady standing on the viewers (R) side of the TSBD Steps. This is a different image. I believe it is a photo. I don't know for sure. With Lovelady allegedly being inside the TSBD for roughly 30 minutes, figuring out when this image was taken is important in the Lovelady timeline. Law Enforcement is visible manning the TSBD front door.

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3704
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #247 on: October 01, 2025, 06:12:32 AM »
   Darnell/Couch does Not show Lovelady standing on the viewers (R) side of the TSBD Steps. This is a different image. I believe it is a photo. I don't know for sure. With Lovelady allegedly being inside the TSBD for roughly 30 minutes, figuring out when this image was taken is important in the Lovelady timeline. Law Enforcement is visible manning the TSBD front door.

I'm sorry Royell, this is 100% a crop from a still taken from Darnell's footage.
I don't know what else to say.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #247 on: October 01, 2025, 06:12:32 AM »