Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.

[Tom Graves]

Who is the man on the steps, Tommy?

Who do you think the man is that Gloria is facing?

Is that a checkered pattern on his shirt?

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

How much did you have to pay Bart Kamp to have him put those stripes in his shirt?

Regardless, you forgot to have him give "Shelly" a full head of hair.

-- Tom

[Dan O'meara]

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

How much did you have to pay Bart Kamp to have him put those stripes in his shirt?

Regardless, you forgot to have him give "Shelly" a full head of hair.

-- Tom

You're avoiding the question, Tommy.
Who do you think the man is, facing Gloria?

[Tom Graves]

You're avoiding the question, Tommy.

Who do you think the man is facing Gloria?

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

I have no idea.

By the same token, who do you think is wearing Lovelady's shirt and walking / running down Elm Street Extension towards the railway yard about 25 seconds after the final shot in Couch, and who is that pivoting, suit-wearing guy with the receding hairline is in front of the steps in Darnell?

-- Tom

[Dan O'meara]

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

I have no idea.

By the same token, who do you think is wearing Lovelady's shirt and walking / running down Elm Street Extension towards the railway yard about 25 seconds after the final shot, and who is that pivoting, suit-wearing guy with the receding hairline is in front of the steps in Darnell?

-- Tom

I have no idea.

Not good enough Tommy.
You and Sandy were pivotal in the identification of Glorai on the steps in this picture.
You must have discussed this image, or one like it, in immense detail.
You tried Joe Molina at one point, so you had an opinion then (one you have correctly abandoned)

It's not good enough to say you have no idea and you know that.
The man in question must have been considered pivotal as far as your identification of Gloria was concerned, so you must give some kind of answer.
You are undermining your own contribution to this case by bailing out on this issue.

[Tom Graves]

I have no idea.

Not good enough Tommy.
You and Sandy were pivotal in the identification of Glorai on the steps in this picture.
You must have discussed this image, or one like it, in immense detail.
You tried Joe Molina at one point, so you had an opinion then (one you have correctly abandoned)

It's not good enough to say you have no idea and you know that.
The man in question must have been considered pivotal as far as your identification of Gloria was concerned, so you must give some kind of answer.
You are undermining your own contribution to this case by bailing out on this issue.

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

It's interesting that you can't explain why the Lovelady figure walking / running down Elm Street Extension in Couch-Darnell is wearing Lovelady's shirt and has Lovelady's bald spot.

It must be very disconcerting for you.

-- Tom

[Dan O'meara]

Dear danny BOY o'meara,

It's interesting that you can't explain why the Lovelady figure walking / running down Elm Street Extension in Couch-Darnell is wearing Lovelady's shirt and has Lovelady's bald spot.

It must be very disconcerting for you.

-- Tom

Come on, Tommy.
Who is the man on the steps?



White men on the steps:
Buell Frazier - no, we can see him at the top of the steps
Bill Shelley - no, Shelley had on a black jacket and a quiff
Joe Molina - no, was wearing a white shirt and reported interacting with Gloria in the lobby
Otis Williams - no, was wearing a white shirt

This leaves Billy Lovelady.
It can only be Billy Lovelady.
What possible alternative is there?

[Royell Storing]

I have no idea.

Not good enough Tommy.
You and Sandy were pivotal in the identification of Glorai on the steps in this picture.
You must have discussed this image, or one like it, in immense detail.
You tried Joe Molina at one point, so you had an opinion then (one you have correctly abandoned)

It's not good enough to say you have no idea and you know that.
The man in question must have been considered pivotal as far as your identification of Gloria was concerned, so you must give some kind of answer.
You are undermining your own contribution to this case by bailing out on this issue.

   Do you have a timestamp for the image showing Lovelady on the (R) side of the TSBD Front Steps?  Law Enforcement is in the background controlling the TSBD front door. This needs to be factored into the timeline of that Lovelady image.