Why JFK's Tie and Shirt Slits Destroy the Single-Bullet Theory

[Michael T. Griffith]

I just web-published a short article on why JFK's tie and shirt slits destroy the SBT:

Why JFK's Tie and Shirt Slits Destroy the Single-Bullet Theory
https://sites.google.com/view/jfkshirtandtiedestroysbt/home

The article contains a number of photos of JFK at Love Field and in the motorcade that prove that his tie knot was centered in the middle of his collar band.

The article also contains photos of the tie knot, of the tie, and of the shirt slits.

[Michael T. Griffith]

In the very near future, I will be including the photos from this article in a much longer article titled "JFK's Clothes Prove the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible."

Sometimes simple small things destroy a complicated theory. This is what JFK's tie and shirt slits do to the SBT, as I will document in more detail in my upcoming article. I will also show in my upcoming article that the rear JFK clothing holes likewise destroy the SBT.

[Tom Graves]

I just web-published a short article on why JFK's tie and shirt slits destroy the SBT:

Why JFK's Tie and Shirt Slits Destroy the Single-Bullet Theory
https://sites.google.com/view/jfkshirtandtiedestroysbt/home

The article contains a number of photos of JFK at Love Field and in the motorcade that prove that his tie knot was centered in the middle of his collar band.

The article also contains photos of the tie knot, of the tie, and of the shirt slits.

Dear Comrade Griffith,

Did the medical personnel in Trauma Room One remove JFK's tie with a pair of scissors, or by hacking wildly at it with a scalpel?

If the latter, thank God they weren't using machetes!!!

-- Tom

[Michael T. Griffith]

Dear Comrade Griffith, Did the medical personnel in Trauma Room One remove JFK's tie with a pair of scissors, or by hacking wildly at it with a scalpel? If the latter, thank God they weren't using machetes!!! -- Tom

So you're still ignoring the fact that the absence of a hole through JFK's tie proves that no bullet exited the throat and the shirt slits, which in turn proves that Connally was hit by a separate bullet and that more than one gunman was firing at JFK. Ignoring the hard physical evidence of JFK's tie won't make it go away.

I guess you missed the part where Dr. Carrico said the nurses used a scalpel to cut the clothing, and that one of the nurses confirmed to Henry Hurt that they made the slits and the tie nick? They were not "hacking wildly." While understandably hurrying, they made a tiny nick in the tie and two small slits in the shirt. That hardly constitutes "hacking wildly."

We've known that JFK's tie had no hole through it since the 1990s, when Harold Weisberg finally gained access to high-quality photos of both sides of the tie, but you guys, incredibly, are still in denial about this hard physical evidence.

The refusal of SBT believers to face the hard physical evidence that undeniably refutes the theory is nothing short of cult-like. You guys are just about as unreasoning and unserious as Flat Earthers, Moon-landing deniers, Holocaust deniers, and 9/11 Truthers.

[Michael T. Griffith]

For any who might be interested, over the last few days I have added to this article over a dozen additional photos of JFK wearing a tie at Love Field and during the motorcade, all of which show that his tie knot was centered squarely in the middle of the collar band, just as the other photos show.

Why JFK's Tie and Shirt Slits Destroy the Single-Bullet Theory
https://sites.google.com/view/jfkshirtandtiedestroysbt/home

This is a companion article to my article "JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible" (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MAgWA0frOLVeWY6ok9nzdrgpRN4Wv1AL/view).

[Benjamin Cole]

MTG--

Interesting. Great research, even if some disagree.

Pat Speer is of the view the bullet that struck JFK in the back did not pass through the body.

Then we have Paul Landis stating he found a slug in the limo, that looked like CE-399. There was a same-day FBI memo 11/22 that a Secret Service agent had found a slug in the limo.

My view of the Z-film is that JBC is struck at ~Z-295, while JFK again struck Z-313.

Could have an undercharged round struck JFK ~Z-210? Popped out when he was struck again?

The photos of JFK's tie are compelling.

[Michael T. Griffith]

MTG--
Interesting. Great research, even if some disagree. Pat Speer is of the view the bullet that struck JFK in the back did not pass through the body.

Pat's SBT research is definitely valuable and worthwhile. When Pat is right, his research is usually fabulous.

Then we have Paul Landis stating he found a slug in the limo, that looked like CE-399. There was a same-day FBI memo 11/22 that a Secret Service agent had found a slug in the limo.

Yes, indeed. We also have Dr. James Young's account of a misshapen bullet being found in the limo during the autopsy, after the limo had been flown to DC. What makes Young's account so devastating is that for years he assumed the bullet was one of Oswald's bullets and that it was discussed in the Warren Report. When he realized, years later, that the WC said nothing about it, he was innocent and naive enough to call Arlen Specter and to tell him about the bullet and to ask why the bullet had not been accounted for!

My view of the Z-film is that JBC is struck at ~Z-295, while JFK again struck Z-313.

Then what do we do with the sudden slamming down of the right shoulder, the puffing of cheeks, the pained expression, and the disheveling of hair that begin in Z238?

Maybe Connally's wrist was hit at around Z295? I know many researchers think the wrist shot was a second hit on Connally.

Could have an undercharged round struck JFK ~Z-210? Popped out when he was struck again?

Yes, I think that's the most likely explanation.

The photos of JFK's tie are compelling.

Yes, especially when analyzed in tandem with the photo of the shirt slits.