Ben’s suggestion that CTers need to think in terms of a “small, very small” conspiracy – with which I agree – once again has me wondering why CTrs are almost never willing to discuss the JFKA in terms of, “What sense would that have made?”
This is just surreal. It is further evidence of the shallow nature of your research. If you would ever bother to read some of the better scholarly books that argue for an assassination plot, you would find that they spend a great deal of time, dozens of pages, explaining the motives and goals of the plotters.
It is just baffling that you would get on a public board and pretend that WC skeptics are "almost never" willing to discuss "what sense" killing JFK "would have made."
Let me briefly summarize some of the points that skeptics have made on this issue:
Major elements of the Mafia had two powerful motives for wanting JFK dead: survival and revenge. JFK, through RFK, was threatening the Mafia's very existence, and JFK-RFK had humiliated Carlos Marcello and other major Mafia figures.
Many CIA-backed anti-Castro Cubans and their CIA handlers viscerally hated JFK over the Bay of Pigs and viewed JFK as a traitor or a dangerous pro-communist dupe. One of their motives, and probably the main motive for many of them, was certainly revenge. The other motive was the hope that the more conservative, hawkish LBJ would enable them to topple Castro's regime. Some of them clearly framed Oswald as a Castro-loving commie who shot JFK in the hope that the killing of the president by a pro-Castro Marxist would lead to a U.S. retaliatory invasion of Cuba.
Violent right-wing extremists, some of whom had ties to anti-Castro Cubans and the CIA, despised JFK for several reasons, especially his civil rights initiatives, which enraged them. These folks had already proved themselves quite willing to use violence. Joseph Milteer, a wealthy leader among these extremists, got wind of the JFK murder plot and revealed it to someone he thought was a trustworthy friend but who was actually a Miami police informant.
Most conspiracy theorists contend that the plot involved elements of these three groups, just as many other plots throughout history involved a coalition of various elements, some of whom were not always on friendly terms with each other but who agreed to work together under the concept of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" to remove a common foe whom they viewed as the most dangerous threat.